.
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it – Voltaire
This type of “words of wisdom” may be meaningful when the answer to a question is a matter of debate or a matter of opinion.
It may apply to results obtained from a process or from an experiment.
Theories are another example, say opinions about a Galaxy 500 million light years away.
Historical facts specially not yet 100 years old, events still in the memory of parents or grandparents.
Official archives available and definition of Genocide clearly defined.
The guilty party in desperation, resorting to desperate actions.
Censoring debate within its own country, threating any and every country weaker or stronger to stop recognition.
Despite that nearly 20 countries recognise the events as Genocide.
It is absolutely idiotic to refer Voltaire’s remark, absolutely out of context.
You might as well argue green is blue, red is white, using a saying by this “famous” individual to cover an idiocy.
.

You are a cowardly and ignorant thug. You do not wish the Armenian Genocide to be recognised as true because of well-argued and well-presented facts. You just want to bully people into silence by having a law that commands them to remain silent. That then spares you (the ignornamus) from the difficulty of actually learning about the subject and then teaching others about it. That is the real reason why you refused to answer my question about which version of the Armenian Genocide you want set into orthodoxy and then protected by this stupid French law, and what versions you want to make illegal for discussion. You do not actually know enough about the AG to know what is true and what isn't (and neither, of course, do those French politicians).
Leave a comment: