Originally posted by bell-the-cat
View Post
A man writes a book about a rug that is of great historicle significance & asks the white house who is in possession of rug if he might utilize "the people's property". I think it's safe to say the mans intentions can be taken at face value & have nothing to do with him wanting to start a commotion .
Although the book holds the potential for making the author some money, the point that the book makes is why people would read such a book.
As has been pointed out by many (MANY) renowned & respected scholars, the lack of recognition of a genocide & the denial of a genocide paves the way for future genocide. Also the denial of genocide is in fact a continuation of the genocide.
The white house response was just another example of USA brown nosing.
To have honored the request would have sent a clear message that NEEDS be sent. And the cost and trouble would have been dirt cheap. Compare that to the amount of money & effort the turk spends & uses to BLATANTLY lie.
Yet more worthless commentary from bell the Armenian basher.
What a pathetic life (existence).

Was it because the White House invented this "explanation" long after the actual decision had been made? Or was it because some Armenian organisations wanted to make a commotion over nothing and so never actually asked for a proper reason? Each explanation is equally possible, I think.


Leave a comment: