Originally posted by Christina
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Revolution finally?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Revolution finally?
No it isn't. The BBC is a propaganda news station, remember. Never believe a propaganda outlet when it is talking about events happening in its own back yard. If the "occupy" camps are reported at all on the BBC, they are dismissed by being called "anti-capitalist protesters" (which is like saying "flat earthers").Last edited by bell-the-cat; 10-27-2011, 01:32 PM.
-
Re: Revolution finally?
Originally posted by Mos View PostYou make a claim you should provide substantial evidence for it. It shouldn't be that difficult to understand. Just because you say so, doesn't make it so. There are people all over the world that can make up silly ideas, but its the ideas that are backed with evidence and facts that are looked at seriously. So act in an academic way or else don't make arguments you can support academically, because there's not point in discussing such ideas.
Saying that one should back an argument with facts is " parroting crap said by those working in the corrupt system" ??

Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finally?
US dollar is a rather universalised fiat currency, thus with the element of "universalisation" have the ability to print money rather easily.Originally posted by Haykakan View PostIts simple really-findwhat the USA dollar is based on and you will have your proof!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finally?
Its simple really-findwhat the USA dollar is based on and you will have your proof!Originally posted by Mos View PostYou make a claim you should provide substantial evidence for it. It shouldn't be that difficult to understand. Just because you say so, doesn't make it so. There are people all over the world that can make up silly ideas, but its the ideas that are backed with evidence and facts that are looked at seriously. So act in an academic way or else don't make arguments you can support academically, because there's not point in discussing such ideas.
Saying that one should back an argument with facts is " parroting crap said by those working in the corrupt system" ??

Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finally?
You make a claim you should provide substantial evidence for it. It shouldn't be that difficult to understand. Just because you say so, doesn't make it so. There are people all over the world that can make up silly ideas, but its the ideas that are backed with evidence and facts that are looked at seriously. So act in an academic way or else don't make arguments you can support academically, because there's not point in discussing such ideas.Originally posted by Serjik View PostOh pleas I am not your nanny or your daddy. Type ponzi scheme and US economy and you will get a ton of stuff. In the stuff you'll find a lot of credible people like Adam Schiff, Max Kaizer and Marc Faber talking about what a racket the US economy has become. I am sure you will reply by parroting crap said by those working in the corrupt system. The whole US system is based on the Fed and the Wall Street and it is a fake. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing cuz I am not discussing this thing with you anymore.
Saying that one should back an argument with facts is " parroting crap said by those working in the corrupt system" ??
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finally?
Oh pleas I am not your nanny or your daddy. Type ponzi scheme and US economy and you will get a ton of stuff. In the stuff you'll find a lot of credible people like Adam Schiff, Max Kaizer and Marc Faber talking about what a racket the US economy has become. I am sure you will reply by parroting crap said by those working in the corrupt system. The whole US system is based on the Fed and the Wall Street and it is a fake. Stop arguing for the sake of arguing cuz I am not discussing this thing with you anymore.
Originally posted by Mos View PostI'm still waiting for Serjik to provide me with substantial academic proof that all the world markets, stocks, financial system is a "ponzi scheme"
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finely?
i n f l a t i o nOriginally posted by bell-the-cat View Postquite a wise observation. There is too much money that is not real money (most of it is not backed up by things that have real value). And what does america do to solve this problem of too much worthless money being unable to find things of value to attach to - it prints even more billions of the stuff!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finely?
Quite a wise observation. There is too much money that is not real money (most of it is not backed up by things that have real value). And what does America do to solve this problem of too much worthless money being unable to find things of value to attach to - it prints even more billions of the stuff!Originally posted by Serjik View PostAper how old are you? Wall Street and Washington creates virtual money and they force the world to use it. Its one big damn ponzi-scheme! The dollar is fake! Banks create money out of thin air. Stocks derivatives are also fake they are virtual realities made up by some mathematician and then they sell it to the naive people for mega profit. Its all a hoax like black magic!
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Revolution finally?
Well the article itself is weak and it's definitely not an academic article - it seems to be more an opinionated article devoid of any real analysis of substantial references, not to mention the nature of the website it was published on. Now when it comes to what the author is saying - it's pretty typical rant about the control of the world via a small elite - in essence very similar to the New World Order conspiracy theorists. Again, like he does in his article, we can have an interesting discussion about how much real control we think this elite has over the world and what their real intentions are. I think it's pretty obvious first off, that large multi-national companies and the top people in them yield a lot of power and can make many things happen. These elites naturally will have a lot of control over governments, for example through lobbying efforts which comes with their money - all this is accepted fact. Now saying that there is this "plan for the world" which includes genocides, wars, etc. in order to control the world is crossing the line into indefinite and unsupported statements. It's a far-fetched assumption and not an analytical or academic conclusion - and if you ask me, just fringe paranoia.Originally posted by Haykakan View Post
I'm still waiting for Serjik to provide me with substantial academic proof that all the world markets, stocks, financial system is a "ponzi scheme"
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: