Pentagon Attack on 911

[Armenian]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Its quite easy to figure out Larry Silverstein's story. It most probably went something like this:

Its quite obvious that the destruction of the WTC complex was planned long ago by the Pakistani ISI and the American CIA for various geo-political reasons. Naturally, the Israeli Mossad was on the trail (or had some part in) throughout the planning stage of this covert operation. As a result of the Mossad connection, well connected joos throughout the world found out about the impending attacks on the WTC complex as well.

When the attacks became imminent, these people in the know made their moves. Many placed put options upon the airlines involved. Some Israeli firms within the WTC complex abandoned their office space, one even breaking their lease to do so. Some did not show up to work. Some even organized picnics upon a Union City roof top over looking the WTC complex the very morning of the attacks. Some also began planning a final bloody move against Palestinians. And last but not least, Larry Silverstein purchased the complex several months prior to the attacks - and insured it against terrorism. This massive purchase was said to be the first owner change in WTC's 30 year history.

Larry obviously got into this real estate deal with the high hopes of making a financial killing - pardon the pun.

Please also note that when Larry first bought the property, the WTC complex had serious problems with environmental issues. The complex was loaded with asbestos which made any renovation or repairs of the property a financial and logistical nightmare. This nasty environmental issue also made the piece of real estate in question very un-lukerative and quite problematic.

In realty, it would have been much beter for the new owner to knock the damn thing down and rebuild.

So, with the impending attacks looming not too far off. Larry - the shrewed slum lord that he is - thought of (or was told to) placing explosive charges throughout the WTC complex. The hope here was that once the attacks occurred the buildings in question would then be demolished and billions of Dollars in insurance claims would be obtained thereafter.

All this, not to mention that the fact that property in question now had the full potential of become an international shrine, with a brand new environmentally friendly office complex for the financial elites of this world. And lets not forget this operation also had a bonus geopolitical dividend for Joos as well - as a result of the 9/11 attacks Israel's enemies instantaniously morphed into America's enemies.

Hey, all in all, a good day for Larry, a good day for the free market economy, a good day for defense contractors, a good day for bible-belt hate mongers, a good day for the oil lobby, and a very good day for Israel.

This is my story and I'm sticking to it.

Any others?

[Sip]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Hey, all in all, a good day for Larry, a good day for the free market economy, a good day for defense contractors, a good day for bible-belt hate mongers, a good day for the oil lobby, and a good day for Israel.

Don't forget, also a VERY good day for Allah. I guess everyone won that day.

[Lamb Boy]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Hey Sip I was wondering if you could address the points I made in my last post or answer the question I posed towards the end.

[skhara]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Don't forget, also a VERY good day for Allah

Incorrect. Allah had an aweful day that day -- he was the scape goat.

[Armenian]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Don't forget, also a VERY good day for Allah. I guess everyone won that day.

Actually, no.

9/11 was perhaps the worst tragedy that befell the Islamic world since the Mongolian invasions. Allah did not start having a good day until the recent rise of Iran and the Hizbollah-Israel war

[Sip]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Hey Sip I was wondering if you could address the points I made in my last post or answer the question I posed towards the end.

I'll try my best but I I'll have to watch the videos first before I can make a meaningful comment. I'll be traveling again in the coming few days so I'll again only have shady/temporary connections but don't think I am ignoring you if I don't reply in the next two weeks.

[Lamb Boy]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

I'll try my best but I I'll have to watch the videos first before I can make a meaningful comment. I'll be traveling again in the coming few days so I'll again only have shady/temporary connections but don't think I am ignoring you if I don't reply in the next two weeks.

Thank you Sip and I'll try my best not to think that!

Thanks for keeping an open mind. The Press for Truth is very well done ...

[Armenian]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

More Psyops

Musharraf: US threatened to bomb Pakistan after 9/11

NEW YORK (Reuters) - President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan said that after the September 11 attacks the United States threatened to bomb his country if it did not cooperate with America's war campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Musharraf, in an interview with CBS news magazine show "60 Minutes" that will air Sunday, said the threat came from Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage and was given to Musharraf's intelligence director.

"The intelligence director told me that (Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age,'" Musharraf said.

"I think it was a very rude remark."

Reuters: http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...News-newsOne-2

I say, total and complete Bull-kaka. They are trying to play the public as if they are cheap toys. The Pakistani ISI's role in 9/11 and their covert support by the CIA is becoming more and more public. As a result, we get fairytales like the one above. And let me remind you this comes a month or so after the following development:

Pakistan defends peace deal [with Taliban/Al-Qaeda]

WASHINGTON -- Pakistan's foreign minister yesterday strongly defended a truce with militants along his country's border with Afghanistan, saying ``not just brawn but brains" are needed in the fight against terrorists. Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf's deal with militants in an area where Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden could be hiding has drawn criticism that Islamic extremists will have a haven.

``I can understand why people are confused, but there's a time when not just brawn but brains are also needed," Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri said. ``Sometimes what happens is that when you have acts of violence you end up alienating the local population." Kasuri took on those who have accused Pakistan of not doing enough in the hunt for bin Laden and other terrorist leaders, saying ``Pakistan's commitment to the war against extremism and terrorism is very much in place." Link: http://www.boston.com/news/world/art...e_deal?mode=PF

And take a look at this BS:

Al-Qaeda invites Americans to convert

Cairo — Al-Qaeda's deputy leader Ayman al-Zawahri issued a new videotape Saturday along with a man identified as an American member of the terror network, inviting Americans to convert to Islam. The 41-minute video, posted on an Islamic militant Web site nine days before the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, had footage of Mr. al-Zawahri and a man the video identified as Adam Yehiye Gadahn (a joo none the less), an American who the FBI believes attended al-Qaeda training camps in Pakistan and served as an al-Qaeda translator. Mr. Gadahn and Mr. al-Zawahri did not appear together in the footage but were each featured on a split screen. Both wore white turbans and robes. It was the second time Mr. Gadahn has appeared in the same video with Mr. al-Zawahri. In a July 7 video marking the one-year anniversary of bombings against the London transit system, Mr. Gadahn said no Muslim should "shed tears" for Westerners killed by al-Qaeda attacks.

And just recently this:

Pakistan President Released Al Qaeda Suspects

WASHINGTON — When Pakistan's president arrives here on Friday, he will be grilled about his decision this month to release more than 1,000 prisoners, some of whom are suspected to be high-value Al Qaeda operatives. The problem for the White House is that America does not know which prisoners were released as part of a ceasefire agreement the Pakistani military signed with tribal leaders in the border province of Waziristan. Pakistani officials have yet to share the names with their American counterparts, according to an intelligence official and an administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity. Link: http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=40183

All it takes ia half a brain to see what's really going on.

"They were in the final stages of planning for execution" -- Michael Chertoff US homeland security

Psyops at its worst

Scare the public and then do what you want. Yet the clue to it all lies right here:

Pakistan is America's, England's and Israel's closest regional ally. Government bodies with the United States and elsewhere rely on the utter stupidity of their citizenry in order to impliment their unholy agendas. I ask again: If the souce of Islamic problems, including Al-Qaeda, is in Pakistan why do we have 150,000 troops in Iraq and are currently seeking ways to attack Syria and Iran? It is well known, outside of the US, that the Al-Qaeda is most probably a branch of Pakistan's ISI with close high-level ties with Saudi Arabia. And it is also well known within the region that the ISI and the CIA are two sides of the same coin.

These aforementioned events are nothing but scare operations intended to convince the general public that we are under attack and we must stike hard against our enemies. And just sit back and watch how this "terror" plot by a bunch of Pakistanis and Egyptians get turned into an excuse to attack Syria and Iran.

Yesterday the warpigs in Washington got a scare when the blood-thirsty kike Lieberman got defeted in Connecticut Primaries. Yesterday there was a lot of talk about the anti-war movement gaining public support in the up-coming elections. Today, political analysts are asking whether or not the American public would still support the anti-war movement after what happened in London. And one asked - if the Democrat Party Primaries in Connecticut where held today would Lieberman have won?

Too bad the majority of the population in the western world is too stupid to understand what is really going on in the world today.

We are headed towards a clash with Iran and Syria. Iran will not be an easy target. Thus, the authorities must whip up a frenzy within the general public. The public must be made to see red. I wont be surprised if all this mess ends up with a mushroom cloud over Tehran. And as they did in Japan some sixty years ago, they will say that the best option they had to save the lives of countless Americans and Israelis was to kill a few hundred thousand Iranians and, in doing so, free them from an "evil" regime.

One World Order is upon us.

[Armenian]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

Musharraf Defends Deal With Tribal Leaders

WASHINGTON, Sept. 22 — President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan tried to convince President Bush on Friday that a deal he approved with tribal leaders in one of the country’s most lawless border areas would rid the areas of Qaeda and Taliban influence, rather than give the groups more freedom to operate.

Mr. Bush and his national security aides were clearly skeptical, according to administration officials, but at a news conference, Mr. Bush appeared to take General Musharraf’s assurances at face value. General Musharraf knew that there were enough questions in the air about the accord that he felt compelled to explain that “this deal is not at all with the Taliban; as I said, this is against the Taliban, actually.”

At the heart of the discussion in the Oval Office was a fear among American officials that General Musharraf, whose political hold over sections of his own country is tenuous at best, is only episodically engaged in the battle against Al Qaeda and the Taliban. That has been an increasingly contentious issue between Afghanistan and Pakistan, with Afghan leaders complaining that many of the attacks launched against Afghan targets are originating from Pakistan’s side of the border.

General Musharraf’s visit marked the fifth anniversary of the radical change in Washington’s relationship with Islamabad after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, but the uneasiness of the alliance created from those events was on full display today.

General Musharraf, who has a book coming out on Monday, told “60 Minutes,” in an interview to be broadcast this weekend on CBS, that Richard L. Armitage, then the deputy secretary of state, had threatened Pakistan’s intelligence chief in September 2001 that the consequences of failing to side with the United States would be huge. General Musharraf quoted the intelligence chief as recalling Mr. Armitage as saying: “Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age.”

But Mr. Armitage said Friday that he had never made such a threat, and that he was not authorized to make any threats during that meeting. “I never made a threat in my life that I couldn’t back up,” he said on CNN. “Since I wasn’t authorized to say such a thing, hence, I couldn’t back up that threat.”

When asked about the issue at the East Room news conference, General Musharraf refused to answer the question — not on national security grounds, but on the grounds that it would violate his book contract. “I am launching my book on the 25th, and I am honor-bound to Simon & Schuster not to comment on the book before that day,” he said.

After laughter subsided, Mr. Bush said, “In other words, buy the book.”

But Mr. Bush also said that he “was taken aback by the harshness of the words” of the threat, and that he doubted that events unfolded that way. He said he recalled that General Musharraf was “one of the first leaders to step up and say that the stakes have changed.”

Mr. Armitage did recall telling Pakistan’s leaders that they had to make a choice between supporting the Taliban and supporting the United States, which was clearly headed into conflict with the Taliban leaders of Afghanistan. But five years later, the loyalties of the tribal leaders in North Waziristan are divided, with many of the tribesmen allied with the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

That subject took up much of the time between the leaders today. General Musharraf said the agreement had “three bottom lines.” He said one was “no Al Qaeda activities in our tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan.” The second was “no Taliban activity” in the same areas. And the third was “no Talibanization,’’ which he described as “obscurantist thoughts or way of life.”

It is unclear how General Musharraf can enforce such edicts, however, or even whether Pakistani government forces could go into the tribal areas to hunt down Osama bin Laden, the Qaeda leader. Tony Snow, President Bush’s spokesman, said after the news conference that he did not believe that the discussion went into that level of detail, though the scope of Islamabad’s authority to send forces into the area is a crucial point of concern at the White House.

“He made it clear he is serious about going after the Taliban,” Mr. Snow said.

That is also a central concern of Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, who is supposed to have dinner with General Musharraf and Mr. Bush at the White House next week.

In a meeting with reporters and editors of The New York Times on Thursday, Mr. Karzai said his government had provided Pakistan with “information on training grounds, on operations, people, their phone numbers, their GPS locations,” in an effort to rout out Taliban forces.

“Our friends come back to us and say this information is old,” he said. “Maybe. But it means they were there.”

Mr. Bush and General Musharraf stepped around the question of whether American forces or intelligence agencies had the right to go into Pakistan to hunt down Mr. bin Laden. General Musharraf has bristled at the idea before, largely because of the unpopularity of giving American forces the right to operate inside Pakistan’s borders.

On Friday, Mr. Bush fudged the issue by saying, “We’re on the hunt together.”

On Thursday, asked if he knew the whereabouts of Mr. bin Laden, Mr. Karzai smiled and said: “If I said he was in Pakistan, President Musharraf would be mad at me. And if I said he was in Afghanistan, it would not be true.”

NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/wo...nt&oref=slogin

[Armenian]

Re: Pentagon Attack on 911

9/11, Shock & Awe: clip from "Hijacking Catastrophe": http://video.google.ca/videoplay?doc...32339745819805

9/11 Mysteries: http://video.google.ca/videoplay?doc...003&pr=goog-sl