Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

[Mos]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

^^ Malaysia? I would think the embassy of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iraq, maybe even our country's would be involved...

[Federate]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

We're not an American client state yet

[hipeter924]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

^^ Malaysia? I would think the embassy of Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iraq, maybe even our country's would be involved...

I suspect half or more of the people arrested are not spies at all, lets not forget the last US journalist.

[Haykakan]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

It would not let me start a new thread so im posting this in the most relevant thread i could find.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index.php/politics/2888-iran-russia-china-mulling-joint-missile-shield-

Iran, Russia, China mulling joint missile shield
25 September 2011 16:53


TEHRAN - Unofficial sources have announced that Iran, Russia, and
China are currently holding talks on a proposal to establish a joint
missile defense shield as a counterweight to a NATO defense shield,
according to a recent report.

The report, which was published in the Iranian daily newspaper Kayhan
on Sunday, said that the sources cited two reasons why serious
consultations have been held on the initiative.

First, all three states have come to the conclusion that U.S.
officials' assertion that their concern over the alleged missile and
nuclear capabilities of Iran and North Korea is the reason for the
decision to establish a NATO missile defense shield is just a pretext
and the true objective of the shield is to threaten Russia and China.

In addition, now that the proposal to establish an early warning radar
system in southeast Turkey, which is one component of the NATO missile
defense shield, appears to be a done deal, the U.S. is now planning to
establish other components of the new system in South Korea and
Taiwan, which clearly shows that Washington is using the alleged
threat from Iran and North Korea as a pretext to target China and
Russia.

An informed expert believes China, which has not taken any action on
the issue so far, is beginning to comprehend the level of danger posed
by the new system.

Russia's analysis of the situation is similar to Iran's view, which
was expressed during Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai
Patrushev's recent visit to Tehran.

Therefore, it seems the three countries have realized that the time
has come to seriously start discussions on the plan.

Some sources say Dmitry Rogozin, the Russian envoy to NATO, who is
scheduled to travel to Iran before the end of September, will probably
hold operational discussions on the plan with Iranian officials.

According to RIA Novosti, Rogozin is going to discuss `strategic
issues' in Tehran.

Military experts are of the opinion that since Iran, Russia, and China
have made great progress in designing anti-aircraft defense systems,
the construction of such a missile shield system will not be a
difficult task for them.

[Mos]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

I don't understand why US/NATO want to re-start the Cold War, didn't they have enough?

[Federate]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

I don't understand why US/NATO want to re-start the Cold War, didn't they have enough?

Imperialists are never satisfied.

[Mos]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Imperialists are never satisfied.

All large powers tend to be imperialists. It comes natural with power.

[londontsi]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Israel Considers Pre-Emptive Attack On Iran

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16101552

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to rally support in his cabinet for an attack on Iran, according to government sources.

The country's defence minister Ehud Barak and the foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman are said to be among those backing a pre-emptive strike to neutralise Iran's nuclear ambitions.

But a narrow majority of ministers currently oppose the move, which could trigger a wave of regional retaliation.

The debate over possible Israeli military action has reached fever pitch in recent days with newspaper leader columns discussing the benefits and dangers of hitting Iran......

[arakeretzig]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

maybe this middle east choas will solve itself in the end, everybody kills everybody?

[KanadaHye]

Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

maybe this middle east choas will solve itself in the end, everybody kills everybody?

That would be counter productive... nobody would be left to harvest the oil!