Attention Surfer

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by surferarmo That was a long post.

The fact of the matter is that people would congregate around someone who provided a service. It would be ineffecient for everyone to have their own police force with a farm and their own system of highways. People would specialize, then trade, and there you go, centralized authority arises. The police force house would be the central authoritative body thus the central governing body.

Anarchism fails.

Again to the long post of all I had to say you produce small little paragraphs without any insight.

You assume that because such a system hasn't been employed it cannot work.

The system propsed, I chose not to explain fully because I might pervert it, as Hans Hermann Hoppe does it fully in his book Democracy: The God That Failed.

While you say "Anarchism fails", what about democracy? It has failed. Anarchism, or anarcho-capitalism, or what have you, hasn't failed since it hasn't even been established and mind you it is based on the principle of the individual and private ownership of your property.

The model that is proposed is based on property, production and free market economics, not some utopian ideal of property confiscation, redistribution, and taxation, which all the political systems have employed, whether it was the fascists, the nazis, the socialists, communists or the democrats.

Democracy has failed yet you maintain we stick to the present course? All isms that are against property rights of individuals and market based economics all fail eventually.

The supporters of 'democracy' such as the neo conservatives and other Statists have stated that "DemocracY" is the "endpoint", meaning this is as far as man has gone and no other perfect form of "government" will replace this, meaning this is it, there is no where else to go beyond this.

Such people are also bent on using nuclear weapons since there is no endpoint and they will fight to the ends to defend this fallacious religion.

I beg to differ as there is quite another form of development that man has not reached, relating to the individual.

But while such small little paragraphs which you use as a response, effectively reaffirm your belief and allegiance in your ideology, and for the time being you're saved from having to critique yourself and the isms, it is nonetheless based on falsities.

[surferarmo]

Anarchism is in place before the employment of any new state. The fact is, people run into problems and they center into a group who abides by a policy or set of policies. Right there, anarchism fails. I am not judging it as good or bad, it just doesnt work. Maybe democracy has failed, but its extent of corruption upon failing does not equal to that of a totalitarian regime like the one you are defeding in Iraq.