Anon, I see you are online too

[patlajan]

In both cases the finger is not on the trigger. They should have given that boy asylum. Bad move by the Clinton administration. The whole wet foot dry foot policy is stupid.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by patlajan In both cases the finger is not on the trigger. They should have given that boy asylum. Bad move by the Clinton administration. The whole wet foot dry foot policy is stupid.

Insightful analysis: +1 point
Failure to spot Woody Harrelson as the SWAT: - 3 points.

That Woody Harrelson is one talented mother f'er.

[anileve]

I agree with the policy, but the whole case was a very political issue, the boy's well being was of no one's concern.

The only thing that is really disturbing, is that the mother practically risked her life in order to escape from the persecution and give her son an ability to be free of that awful regime. And although the life was sacrificed it was in vain. Now that is xxxxed up!

[Anonymouse]

Wow, replacing one kind of tyranny with another.

That's just hilarity at its finest!!!!!!

[anileve]

Any society of force-whether ruled by criminal bands or by an organized State-fundamentally means the rule of the jungle, or economic chaos. -Murray N. Rothbard

It really always about the economics, but it always boils down to Darwinism; economics is another form of power and strength on a larger scale.

[Anonymouse]

Wow you quoted Murray N. Rothbard.

How did you know about him?

He is like my personal God, along with Mises. The man is well beyond his time really. Not bad for an Austrian Jew.

[anileve]

Read some stuff recently, came across his quote. However, I still disagree with anarchy and I don't have time to get into it. Anarchy might succeed in an ideal society however it fails in its practicality in the real world. My enlightenment which you so desperately need is coming, just have some patience and I'll drop a bomb on you. Ya heard?!

[Anonymouse]

It's not "anarchy" lol my little mislead eve.

It's based on free market economics, and property, and production, stemming from individual.

"Ideal" would be what the Marxians wanted "we should all share", but au contraire Anarcho-Capitalists, as that is how they have been dubbed recognize the inequalities in our world, recognize that there always will be murders, killers, and thieves, there is no contention there.

It's the method. The "State" is a monopoly and thus counter to what the principles of economics are.

[Anonymouse]

What are you babbling about again?

And if this isn't oppression? It's like Plato's allegory of the cave. It's really just funny.

It's like the "Civilized Europeans" saying that "those people are less civilized and we should conquer them".

In a subjective world you try to put objective rules.

[anileve]

Me 3, Badrjanchik, you tell this hippie!