Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Real Men

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • loseyourname
    replied
    Originally posted by felizitation Yes, but here again all your rethoric was just based on a few words I certainly would express much better in my language, and you failed the important point of what I tried to say.

    Then calling me non sense or whatever.
    You're right. I did focus on your one slip-up and ignore your larger point. I apologize.

    Leave a comment:


  • felizitation
    replied
    Originally posted by loseyourname Yes, everything depends on these things. Therefore it was superfluous of you to say it, and it did nothing to further your argument.
    Yes, but here again all your rethoric was just based on a few words I certainly would express much better in my language, and you failed the important point of what I tried to say.

    Then calling me non sense or whatever.

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    Originally posted by felizitation Anyway, the important part of the post was just before "Moreover, it depends on trends and change in time".
    Yes, everything depends on these things. Therefore it was superfluous of you to say it, and it did nothing to further your argument.

    Leave a comment:


  • felizitation
    replied
    Originally posted by loseyourname Your purpose is not a mathematical function. I was not wrong to say that M mirrors A. Nor was I saying something tangential to your discussion. My whole point was that everything changes with time, except the laws of physics. It does no service to your argument to say that labels change with time. That statement is completely superfluous to the discussion.
    Anyway, the important part of the post was just before "Moreover, it depends on trends and change in time".

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    Your purpose is not a mathematical function. I was not wrong to say that M mirrors A. Nor was I saying something tangential to your discussion. My whole point was that everything changes with time, except the laws of physics. It does no service to your argument to say that labels change with time. That statement is completely superfluous to the discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • felizitation
    replied
    Originally posted by ; What did I say that contradicted any of this mathematical brilliance?
    You were talking about the function M being the miror of A, which was out of purpose. M is also a function of time
    Not [ M(A) equals A]
    Not [ M(A, X1) equals M(A, X2) ]

    You should be keen on mirrors ...

    ;

    Leave a comment:


  • felizitation
    replied
    Originally posted by Arvestaked I understand your point. That does not mean I cannot be offended by a person who subscribes to a "trend." If you are different than good for you. But I do not want to hear anymore of this unfounded, elitist crap.
    What elitist ???
    I don't know if i'm different, actually i don't care. My thoughts exists in the only bounds of my life.
    Now, i was talking about me (do you remember ?), because my opinions concern only me. Now if you see a lack of respect or any kind of hurtings, I'll respect you and
    - Either never try to "label" you (even as armenian, american armenian ...)
    - Or call you exactly as what you want, ie. ameriga-hay (as far i've understood)

    PS.: i'm making too much mistakes in your language, hope you would excuse me...

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    Originally posted by frenchie I'm sorry, I speak too fast for you. So, I was saying, it depends on trends, which means:

    You take individual A, and you put it on time X1 and X2. The function F, giving the label of A, is a function of A obviously, but also of time.

    So : not [ F(A, X1) equals F(A, X2) ]

    even if A is the SAME at X1 and X2.

    Do you understand ; ?
    What did I say that contradicted any of this mathematical brilliance?

    Leave a comment:


  • Arvestaked
    replied
    Originally posted by felizitation I'm sorry, I speak too fast for you. So, I was saying, it depends on trends, which means:

    You take individual A, and you put it on time X1 and X2. The function F, giving the label of A, is a function of A obviously, but also of time.

    So : not [ F(A, X1) equals F(A, X2) ]

    even if A is the SAME at X1 and X2.

    Do you understand ; ?
    I understand your point. That does not mean I cannot be offended by a person who subscribes to a "trend." If you are different than good for you. But I do not want to hear anymore of this unfounded, elitist crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • felizitation
    replied
    Originally posted by Arvestaked I do not agree. I am sorry. I am sick and tired of people making me feel guilty for being offended. xxxx you for being stupid.
    I've never said you're stupid ...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X