Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenians on wellfare

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    $600,000?? wtf... you can get a palace here for 600,000 CANADIAN dollars (that's even less in U.S. dollars..)

    for $350,000 canadian dollars, you get a big house....

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Darorinag $600,000?? wtf... you can get a palace here for 600,000 CANADIAN dollars (that's even less in U.S. dollars..)

      for $350,000 canadian dollars, you get a big house....
      Glacier property values are not as high as those on land.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by patlajan Glacier property values are not as high as those on land.
        LOL.

        Comment


        • #14
          the jews did it a long time ago, got away with it . Armenians usually get into the game late, they get too greedy, do things really sloppy, and want everything done in a short span of time, thus they get in trouble by the feds :P


          its funny seeing an armenian family of 5 living in a 1 bedroom apartment(on welfare) with 2 new benz parked outside

          people are way too greedy and lazy

          hardly anyone does anything honest anymore
          Last edited by whitelotus; 02-29-2004, 08:59 PM.

          Comment


          • #15
            Indeed, but in a corrupt system as is the case here, no "honest living" will get you above the level of mere subsistence.

            Point to any politician or corporate slug that makes an "honest living" and then you come and criticize the average people for doing it.

            This is the same as those Enron execs that got away, and Martha Stewart gets to fall because she is just another Jane.

            Yes, if politicians do it then morally, the people should do it as well.

            If the State is institutionalized violence and it's "okay" for the State to kill and steal, then individuals can do so as well. Why do we have one set of morals for one people, but another for other people?
            Achkerov kute.

            Comment


            • #16
              the system is currupt, one will always be above the law, and the rest will suffer under the law.

              end of story

              Comment


              • #17
                So now that the issue is settled, maybe one of the moderators can close this thread so as to not waste disk space.
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #18
                  It angers me where there is $300 taken out of my paycheck every week. Then there are these scum bags with homes and buisnesses who get section 8 apartments (80% rent is paid by the gvt) and rent em out to other people while you got people who really need the money suffering. US gvt takes care of foriegners better then their own people. My aunt just bought a 2 bedroom condo for $450k.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Welfare is a state issue with federal block funding. And benefits for aliens have been very limited since 1996. Soo this whole Mexicans and others are eating away our tax dollars thing is a bit of a myth.


                    P.S. - with financing even a pool boy can drive a BMW
                    Last edited by patlajan; 03-01-2004, 12:29 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by djp818 US gvt takes care of foriegners better then their own people.
                      Originally posted by patlajan And benefits for aliens have been very limited since 1996. Soo this whole Mexicans and others are eating away our tax dollars thing is a bit of a myth.
                      It is no myth that most of the land in the US was either taken by force or scammed away from its original inhabitants. True Americans are hardly given any consideration in this country.

                      But back to the thread issue. Welfare is a rotten system to begin with, and it is just begging to be abused. As Mousy points out, how can the US or the state of California hold these people morally culpable when the state and nation themselves are built on a history of bribery and morally corrupt land acquisition? The very island you live on, Manhattan, was bought for the modern day equivalent of somewhere between twenty and a couple hundred bucks. The reason this was able to hold up was that the sellers, the Canarsies, did not have the same concept of land ownership. They thought they were simply giving the Dutch the right to farm, but that the land itself was public and could not be owned. Furthermore, the Canarsies did not even live on Manhattan, they lived in what is now Brooklyn. The Weckquaesgeeks had the right to the island of Manhattan, and yet the Dutch essentially evicted them after purchasing their land from another group that had no claim to it. So all in all, what right does the government have to come in and punish these people for scamming their way into a larger house when the nation itself is built on stolen land?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X