Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too ... See more
See more
See less

Jesus Loves You

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Baron Dants Uph, strong reply there Patlajan jan (I smile everytime I type that).

    What I don't understand is everyone who doesn't believe in Jesus will go around saying that they tolerate no other religion, but from what I've seen, it is atheists or satanists or whatever else that will be the most insulting towards Christianity.

    And why doesn't anyone mention the positive results Christianity has brought? What about all the charities that are sponsored and organized by the Church?

    It's always easier to look at something from one point of view, and ignore everything else.
    Because some people really have something against Christianity and like to bash it for shock value and get others pissed off, or some think they are just a hell of a lot more enlightened than anyone else and feel they have to bash or disrespect other people's beliefs or faith to get their point across.

    Comment


    • #82
      Because some people really have something against <insert religion or issue here> and like to bash it for shock value and get others pissed off, or some think they are just a hell of a lot more enlightened than anyone else and feel they have to bash or disrespect other people's beliefs or faith or choices to get their point across.

      Comment


      • #83
        Look, I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm interested in believing only that which is true. I am a skeptic by nature. The aggregate weight of the evidence is severely against Christianity, or any other religion for that matter. Because of that, prudence dictates that a rational person discard the belief and open his mind. That is all. You are not going to discredit me by questioning my motivation. If I am right, then I am right.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by loseyourname Look, I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm interested in believing only that which is true. I am a skeptic by nature. The aggregate weight of the evidence is severely against Christianity, or any other religion for that matter. Because of that, prudence dictates that a rational person discard the belief and open his mind. That is all. You are not going to discredit me by questioning my motivation. If I am right, then I am right.
          And since when as "rationalism" been the supreme barometer of judgement? Rationalism cannot explain the tons of phenomenon that humans know to exist, yet cannot bring it to reason.

          All thought must, directly or indirectly, by way of certain characters, relate ultimately to intuitions, and therefore, with us, to sensibility, because in no other way can an object be given to us.

          - Immanuel Kant
          Achkerov kute.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Anonymouse And since when as "rationalism" been the supreme barometer of judgement? Rationalism cannot explain the tons of phenomenon that humans know to exist, yet cannot bring it to reason.
            Name me one thing you can explain that reason cannot.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by loseyourname Look, I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm interested in believing only that which is true. I am a skeptic by nature. The aggregate weight of the evidence is severely against Christianity, or any other religion for that matter. Because of that, prudence dictates that a rational person discard the belief and open his mind. That is all. You are not going to discredit me by questioning my motivation. If I am right, then I am right.
              AMEN!!!

              Comment


              • #87
                What the hell happened to the article? Did you delete loser?
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Anonymouse What the hell happened to the article? Did you delete loser?
                  I moved it to the proper thread, the thread about the Passion of the Christ.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by loseyourname Look, I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm interested in believing only that which is true. I am a skeptic by nature. The aggregate weight of the evidence is severely against Christianity, or any other religion for that matter. Because of that, prudence dictates that a rational person discard the belief and open his mind. That is all. You are not going to discredit me by questioning my motivation. If I am right, then I am right.
                    OK That meant nothing. Moving on....This one should go in the Bush what is he saying thread.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by whitelotus i cry because i am extremly sensitive and very emotional.

                      im a believer, which is another reason why it got to me a lot.
                      i dont know....some people cannot cry....and some can. Its how you take things in.

                      It was unhumane, it was very animalistic and barbaric......how can someone just sit there and look bored ? You had to at least feel some sort of emotion ? give me a f*cking break

                      sar thomaner
                      Are you a believer?? and who do you belive?? buddha or JESUS...oh how much i hate empty hypocricy.I bet you never read BIBLE..and i hate ppl who make fun of Jesus.
                      JESUS is my LORD
                      shut up there ***beliver***
                      I'm a monstrous mass of vile, foul & corrupted matter.

                      Comment

                      Working...