It should be interesting to note that Martha Stewart was not convicted of insider trading. She was convicted of perjury. It should also be interesting to note that the law firm she was being advised by when she lied under oath has a very close business relationship with the firm that defended her in the perjury case. Seems like a conflict of interest to be charged with the defense of a woman who could potentially ruin your business associates.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Martha Stewart
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by loseyourname It should be interesting to note that Martha Stewart was not convicted of insider trading. She was convicted of perjury. It should also be interesting to note that the law firm she was being advised by when she lied under oath has a very close business relationship with the firm that defended her in the perjury case. Seems like a conflict of interest to be charged with the defense of a woman who could potentially ruin your business associates.Achkerov kute.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anonymouse This is what I've been saying. The charge was not insider trading but mere "lying". Welcome to the age of thought crime and the failure of the American "justice system". It's not even "insider trading" since she wasn't tipped off by someone from inside the company, but rather her own broker. This whole thing seems too fishy.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Anonymouse This is what I've been saying. The charge was not insider trading but mere "lying". Welcome to the age of thought crime and the failure of the American "justice system". It's not even "insider trading" since she wasn't tipped off by someone from inside the company, but rather her own broker. This whole thing seems too fishy.
Comment
Comment