That's my point, people take one definition over the other, simply because they were taught not to question and accept things as they are, either "bad" or "good", the reasoning behind it doesn't matter. I think that it's wrong, because once the rug is pulled from beneath their feet, they are confused and conflicted.
The point about the painting is valid, however same can be said of the religious underwear. By wearing it, one can say that Jesus is close and with him all day.
I don't want to see it from your religious perspective. I want to see it from your "own" rational perspective, your reasoning aside from what the Bible teaches or the religious authorities pioneer. And you are wrong about Justin, I would feel insulted by subjugating my precious private are to the image of that knucklehead. And we agree on Just and Jesus being two different images, that's why I would pick Jesus over Justin. At least Jesus didn't sing such silly songs.
The point about the painting is valid, however same can be said of the religious underwear. By wearing it, one can say that Jesus is close and with him all day.
I don't want to see it from your religious perspective. I want to see it from your "own" rational perspective, your reasoning aside from what the Bible teaches or the religious authorities pioneer. And you are wrong about Justin, I would feel insulted by subjugating my precious private are to the image of that knucklehead. And we agree on Just and Jesus being two different images, that's why I would pick Jesus over Justin. At least Jesus didn't sing such silly songs.
Comment