Tweet
With regard to the 2nd law or the law of entropy, itsobserved, "It would hardly be possible to conceive of two more completely opposite principles than this principle of entropy increase and the principle of evolution. Each is precisely the converse of the others." As Alduous Huxley defined it, "evolution involves a continual increase of order, of organization, of size, of complexity. It seems to me axiomatic that both cannot possibly be true at a given time. But there is no question whatever that the second law of thermodynamics is true. "
An excess inflow of "ordering energy" into the system from outside may cause it temporarily to grow and become more highly organized. Thus a child may grow into an adult, or men may build a structure. But each of these, and all other illustrations of apparent decrease in entropy, are only local and temporary. Negative entropy is required for its maintenance basically. A seed, fr example, being genetically complete, provides the negative entropy for the growth of a tree.
As far as the first law, that a constant amount of energy is maintained, all matter in the universe is some form of energy amnd the total amount of energy in the universe always remains constant and so energy itself is neither destroyed or created from nothing by any natural process. these laws state that any natural process would involve conservation (1st law) and disintegration (2nd law). Evolution demands "integration and development" and is therefore impossible and mathematically improbable.
as far as the validity of the laws go, "These laws are based upon more evidence than any other principles in science. They have been confirmed by countless thousands of experiments on systems ranging in size from the nuclear to the astronomic, and there is no known exception to either of them." as quoted by Richard Leaky, in Origins. Let it be known that the "urg" to evolve is not at all found in chemistry which is based on sound empirical verification.
Now if you want to seriously discuss evolution please follow the link to my thread that I started.
http://www.armenianclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=137
An excess inflow of "ordering energy" into the system from outside may cause it temporarily to grow and become more highly organized. Thus a child may grow into an adult, or men may build a structure. But each of these, and all other illustrations of apparent decrease in entropy, are only local and temporary. Negative entropy is required for its maintenance basically. A seed, fr example, being genetically complete, provides the negative entropy for the growth of a tree.
As far as the first law, that a constant amount of energy is maintained, all matter in the universe is some form of energy amnd the total amount of energy in the universe always remains constant and so energy itself is neither destroyed or created from nothing by any natural process. these laws state that any natural process would involve conservation (1st law) and disintegration (2nd law). Evolution demands "integration and development" and is therefore impossible and mathematically improbable.
as far as the validity of the laws go, "These laws are based upon more evidence than any other principles in science. They have been confirmed by countless thousands of experiments on systems ranging in size from the nuclear to the astronomic, and there is no known exception to either of them." as quoted by Richard Leaky, in Origins. Let it be known that the "urg" to evolve is not at all found in chemistry which is based on sound empirical verification.
Now if you want to seriously discuss evolution please follow the link to my thread that I started.
http://www.armenianclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=137
Comment