Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Animal cruelty.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Have you heard of Hew Hefner? lol

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by ArmoBarbi
      Have you heard of Hew Hefner? lol
      No. Who is this Hew Hefner that you speak of? Did he invent Heineken?
      Achkerov kute.

      Comment


      • #23
        Perhaps the man needs a psychologist, but removing him from society/locking him up is a bit too drastic.

        Comment


        • #24
          No Heineken, but oh he is one brilliant man. lol (He makes me wanna puke btw)

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by spiral
            Perhaps the man needs a psychologist, but removing him from society/locking him up is a bit too drastic.
            I agree, I think he is in need of an evaluation by a qualified professional. From the results they would make further decisions. (In my world anyway lol)

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by ArmoBarbi
              I agree, I think he is in need of an evaluation by a qualified professional. From the results they would make further decisions. (In my world anyway lol)
              You should be a professional like Leon.

              Achkerov kute.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Anonymouse
                Oh please, lose that silly utilitarian mentality. What makes you think he is unsafe, because he played rough with animals? Is there a study or evidence to suggest that somehow this is going to lead him to attack humans?

                Animal Cruely Leads to Human Cruelty



                "Forget the pig is an animal. Treat him just like a machine in a factory."
                Hog Farm Management industry journal, July 1976.

                Violent acts toward animals have long been recognized as indicators of a dangerous psychopathy that does not confine itself to animals. "Anyone who has accustomed himself to regard the life of any living creature as worthless is in danger of arriving also at the idea of worthless human lives," wrote humanitarian Dr. Albert Schweitzer. "Murderers ... very often start out by killing and torturing animals as kids," according to Robert K. Ressler, who developed profiles of serial killers for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Acts of cruelty toward animals can be the first sign of a violent pathology that includes human victims.

                Animal abuse is not just the result of a minor personality flaw in the abuser but rather a symptom of a deep mental disturbance. Research in psychology and criminology shows that people who commit acts of cruelty toward animals don’t stop there; many of them move on to their fellow humans.

                A history of cruelty to animals is one of the traits that regularly appear in the records of serial rapists and murderers, and the standard diagnostic and treatment manual for psychiatric and emotional disorders lists cruelty to animals as a diagnostic criterion for conduct disorders.

                A study conducted by Northeastern University and the Massachusetts SPCA found that people who abuse animals are five times more likely to commit violent crimes against humans. The majority of inmates scheduled to be executed for murder at California’s San Quentin penitentiary "practiced" their crimes on animals, according to the warden.

                Notorious Killers

                As a child, serial killer and rapist Ted Bundy - ultimately convicted of two killings but suspected of murdering more than 40 women - witnessed his father’s violence toward animals, and he himself subsequently tortured animals.

                Earl Kenneth Shriner, who raped and stabbed a 7-year-old boy, was known in his neighborhood for hanging cats and torturing dogs.

                Brenda Spencer, who opened fire at a California school, killing two children and injuring nine others, had repeatedly abused cats and dogs, often setting their tails on fire.

                Serial killer and cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer impaled the heads of dogs and cats on sticks.

                Animal Cruelty and Family Violence

                Researchers have found that a batterer’s first target is often an animal living in the home, the second a spouse or child. Often, batterers are able to control their victims, such as a spouse, by threatening, torturing, and/or killing the victim’s animals.

                A study published in the February 2000 'Violence Against Women' found that of 111 battered women with pets in shelters in South Carolina, almost half reported that their current or former male partners had threatened or abused their animals.

                A 1995 study of women living in Wisconsin shelters because of domestic abuse found that 80 percent of their batterers had been violent to their animals.

                A 1997 study found that workers in 85 percent of the largest women’s shelters in 48 states had heard reports from women about animal abuse incidents.

                A study comparing 101 women who had been living with animals in five Utah shelters to 120 women who lived with animals and who were not experiencing domestic violence revealed an almost 50 percent difference in the incidence of domestic animal abuse reported.

                Cruel to Animals, Cruel to Children

                Because domestic abuse is directed toward the powerless, animal abuse and child abuse often go hand in hand. Parents who neglect an animal’s need for proper care or abuse animals may also abuse or neglect their own children.

                While animal abuse is an important sign of child abuse, the parent isn’t always the one harming the animal. Children who abuse animals may be repeating a lesson learned at home; like their parents, they are reacting to anger or frustration with violence. Their violence is directed at the only individual in the family more vulnerable than themselves: an animal. One expert says, "Children in violent homes are characterized by...frequently participating in pecking-order battering", in which they may maim or kill an animal. Indeed, domestic violence is the most common background for childhood cruelty to animals.

                In 88 percent of 57 New Jersey families being treated for child abuse, animals in the home had been abused. An unpublished study by Frank Ascione of Utah State University found a strong pattern suggesting that child abuse victims are more likely to harm animals. Ascione found that 25.5 percent of physically abused children were cruel to animals, 13.2 percent of sexually abused children were cruel to animals, 34 percent of both physically and sexually abused children were cruel to animals, while only 4.7 percent of non-abused children were cruel to animals.

                Abusers Cross Species Lines

                Wisconsin’s Leonard Kritz received time served for chopping the heads off three xxxxatiels, a conure, a chinchilla, a python, a boa constrictor, and another snake, after his wife told him that she had had an abortion. Kritz used a World War II bayonet to decapitate the animals and claimed that he did so in order to "teach his wife about the sanctity of life".

                For 13 years, the husband of Sandra Ruotolo of Pennsylvania battered her. The last time, he took a break from beating her with a vacuum cleaner cord and punched Ruotolo’s dog in the face, warning her that if she left him, he would find her and slit her four dogs’ throats in front of her. After contemplating suicide, Ruotolo looked at her dog and thought, "if I die, Duchess, what’s going to happen to you?" and shot her husband to death instead.

                After Melissa Davis of Ocala, Fla., moved in with a friend because her husband repeatedly beat her, he found her and threatened to kill her dogs unless she came home. Davis refused and was presented with the head of her 4-month-old puppy later that day.

                Before Rev. Javan M. McBurrows of Pennsylvania was charged with beating to death a 4-year-old boy, he had been found guilty of two counts of cruelty to animals for mistreating two dogs and convicted of choking his wife, who testified that McBurrows had beaten all eight children living in their house. In the back of the house, police found a neglected dog who was confined to a pen, malnourished, and covered with sores.

                Guillermo Lerma of Edinburg, Texas, who is serving a life sentence for killing his girlfriend’s 2-year-old daughter, decapitated a live puppy in front of a different girlfriend’s children, warning that he would decapitate them as well if they told their mother.

                Rebecca M. Byrd of Brunswick, Maine, was charged with beating her two children, breaking nine bones in her 4-month-old daughter’s body, and punching her son’s head. Shortly before her arrest for these crimes, Byrd’s dog was found dead at the end of a chain tied to an oil tank, left to starve to death with no protection from the elements.

                A Long Road of Violence

                All too often, animal cruelty is viewed as a childhood prank and chalked up to the old adage 'boys will be boys.' But it is foolhardy to ignore statistics that show that kids who hurt animals may be on a dangerous path that will only get worse if not corrected. Studies have shown that violent and aggressive criminals are more likely to have abused animals as children than criminals considered non-aggressive.

                A 1999 Canadian study of 63 suspects who were charged with animal cruelty - ranging from severe animal neglect to intentional killing - found that 78 percent of them had also been charged with offenses involving violence, or the threat of violence, against people. A 1997 study revealed that 46 percent of criminals convicted of sexual homicide had previously committed acts of cruelty toward animals. A survey of psychiatric patients who had repeatedly tortured dogs and cats found that all of them had high levels of aggression toward people as well. All the kids involved in the devastating school shootings in recent years first 'practiced' on animals.

                School shooters share violent past

                April 1999/Littleton, Colo. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot to death 12 fellow students and a teacher and injured more than 20 others. Both teens had reportedly boasted about mutilating animals.

                May 1998/Springfield, Ore. Kip Kinkel, 15, killed his parents and opened fire in his high school cafeteria, killing two and injuring 22 others. He had a history of animal abuse and torture, having boasted about blowing up a cow and killing cats, chipmunks, and squirrels by putting lit firecrackers in their mouths.

                March 1998/Jonesboro, Ark. Mitchell Johnson, 13, and Andrew Golden, 11, pulled their school’s fire alarm and then shot and killed four classmates and a teacher. Golden reportedly used to shoot dogs "all the time" with a .22.

                December 1997/West Paducah, Ky. Michael Carneal, 14, shot and killed three students during a school prayer meeting. Carneal had been heard talking about throwing a cat into a bonfire.

                October 1997/Pearl, Miss. Luke Woodham, 16, shot and killed two of his classmates and injured seven others after stabbing his mother to death. Woodham’s journal revealed that, in a moment of "true beauty," he and a friend had beaten, burned, and tortured his own dog, Sparkle, to death.



                Other links:




                Comment


                • #28
                  Now that we have established the assumption. Does this mean we should lock people up for torturing animals? Again the answer is no.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    We should require immediate psychological evaluations! (like I said already) You are the one who assumed we want to lock people up right away. Of course that is too drastic. We arent assuming that the person WILL kill a human, we are assuming that the person is MORE LIKELY, which not even you can argue with.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      If you have less bowel movements than someone who has an avarege amount, you are more likely to suffer from constipation.

                      "More likely" doesn't mean anything aside from pomp to give "professonals", "researchers" and "statisticians" their much due "respect" they have always looked for.
                      Achkerov kute.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X