Re: Gas Reformulation
I agree (about Iran). A key difference, though, is that with the Cold War, there were two superpowers not fighting due to 'mutually assured destruction.' Why is the US still spending trillions fighting the Cold War, when we should be thinking in an entirely new way? That's a question I have. (Because of long-standing defense contracts and the political power behind them, maybe?) The same goes with many new issues we have not encountered. Maybe the logic of a situation past doesn’t always apply to a new situation--that's true for the fossil fuel situation, too.
I think in that case, "saving gas" would not have been so high up on Anahita's list of problems with the "environment"
Please see:
You got the point, there. Without work towards real peace, the rest doesn't matter (and the people creating hell on Earth, won't be 'going' where they think they're 'going in the name of.') Acts and intents matter.
Originally posted by Sip
I think in that case, "saving gas" would not have been so high up on Anahita's list of problems with the "environment"
Please see:
Originally posted by Anahita
Comment