I've been grading some papers recently and it's been a painful experience. I'm hoping that you guys might be able to help me understand what's going on.
They were given the assignment originally that had a list of questions or points they needed to address... To expand on that, especially since they needed to incorporate empirical findings, I provided the grading criteria. It listed the main things (from original assignment) along with how many points each section would be worth. In addition there were other points within the section to help out a little more. There were tips throughout.
Reading the papers, it seems like they didn't even use it or the original assignment even because there are entire sections not addressed. Then I can't even be lenient with the grading because there's nothing there. A few papers started out okay and then it seemed like they got to 3 pages (the minimum) and thought they needed to finish it off regardless of whether they had included everything. The result has been many papers that are around or even below 50%. I've had one A, (who took me up on my offer to look over before it was due), one B, 2 low Cs, and the rest Fs so far, but I've only graded about 12 or 13 of them.
They're taking me forever to grade because I've been putting lots of comments, so there's no confusion about what's wrong because I don't just want to give them an awful grade without also letting them know how they can avoid it next time. I'm also planning on making a list to give them with what mistakes to avoid next time based on what many of them did for this paper.
Any ideas what the hell their problem is? Why aren't they using what I gave them?
How do you all write your papers normally? Do you do it differently if you get more specific criteria? How do you make sure you don't leave anythign out?
They were given the assignment originally that had a list of questions or points they needed to address... To expand on that, especially since they needed to incorporate empirical findings, I provided the grading criteria. It listed the main things (from original assignment) along with how many points each section would be worth. In addition there were other points within the section to help out a little more. There were tips throughout.
Reading the papers, it seems like they didn't even use it or the original assignment even because there are entire sections not addressed. Then I can't even be lenient with the grading because there's nothing there. A few papers started out okay and then it seemed like they got to 3 pages (the minimum) and thought they needed to finish it off regardless of whether they had included everything. The result has been many papers that are around or even below 50%. I've had one A, (who took me up on my offer to look over before it was due), one B, 2 low Cs, and the rest Fs so far, but I've only graded about 12 or 13 of them.
They're taking me forever to grade because I've been putting lots of comments, so there's no confusion about what's wrong because I don't just want to give them an awful grade without also letting them know how they can avoid it next time. I'm also planning on making a list to give them with what mistakes to avoid next time based on what many of them did for this paper.
Any ideas what the hell their problem is? Why aren't they using what I gave them?
How do you all write your papers normally? Do you do it differently if you get more specific criteria? How do you make sure you don't leave anythign out?
Comment