Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

[oslonor]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

I don't think "he" is a Shahist. Not only he is an anti-regime but clearly he has an anti-Iran agenda. Through his platitudes, Persian-non Persian talk, ethnic "differences" you can see "his" encouragement for disintegration of Iran. So "he" sounds more like a pan-Turkic spamming robot… It has been banned from Iranian sites.

This is an important statement: In future we will here that "there are no Armenians". "Armenians and Azeri Turks are the same people". "They are people from Caucasus". "Pan Turks are trying to separate Armenians from Azeri Turk brothers"!!!! "There are no ethnicities in Caucaus". They are all "Iranians".

Please list where I have been banned???? The only Persian forum has Persian Journal. We had 14000 views on one of my posts there.

By Anti-Iranian, they mean that Oslonor is not an authroized opposition. Most of the opposition to the regime is actually approved opposition and they are mostly started by the regime itself on the internet.

[oslonor]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

How do you know the freak Adolph Kevorkian?

Actually we do have a lot of Adolph Kervokian on this forum. Adolph Kervokian was a joo who claimed to be a Nazi. Here we have Jooos claiming to be Armenian nationalist. Azeri Turks claiming to be Armenian Nationalist. Even Pakistanis claiming to be Armenian nationalist!!!!!!

The only one who has not claimed to be Armenian Nationalist is Oslonor.

[oslonor]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

I didn't know who Catherine Bell was so I looked her up on the internet. It appears that she half Iranian (mother's side) and half English (father's side). Anyway, it turns out that she is not the ideal example for an Iranian women and other than her big boobs and cute face, she's nothing spacial.

What is half-Iranian???? She is not Azeri Turk if you mean by "Iranian"? She is not even a citizen of Iran if you mean she is an Iranian citizen. she is ethnically Persian. There is no Iranian ethnicity in Iran. There are no such people in Iran.

No. She Persian-American actor. Many European American are anglo-saxons so it is the same thing. She does not look British and she looks a typical Persian. So her British side does not play any role here. If you think she looks British then you should buy some glasses.

The main point is why some people are trying to create a big nose for Persians with fraud methods?!!!!!! Why they insist on their "Big Nose Aryan Theory"????

[yerazhishda]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

[oslonor]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

No I'm not saying the partian were greeks, but I'm saying those statues are not partians but rather greeks from probably Seleucid empire or one of the Indo hellenic kingdoms.


Yes off course, it has nothing to do with the fact with the fat that Alexander conquered it, it was then ruled by the Seleucid kingdoms and later by an independent Bactrain kingdom. No it was all the parthians.


No I'm saying when the Saka tribes invade India, they adopted to the cultures there. Those were hellenic and indian. They didn't become indians or greeks they stayed the same Saka. But their culture changed from Nomadic to Indo-Hellenic.

Mr. KarotheGreat: It is very clear from your comments, which also have been posted on Pakistani forums, that you are a Pakistani. Now the question is what is a Pakistani doing on an Armenian forum?

Pathians have nothing to do with Pakistanis!!!!!!

Pakistan supplies The Republic of Azerbaijan with Mujaheds from Pakistan and they were involved in the War against Armenia. Also Pakistan provides intelligence and military arms to the Republic of Azerbaijan. Some Pakistanis have been moved to Azerbaijan and now these Pakistanis claim that Pakistanis have lived in Azerbaijan since ancient times!!!!!

Also Pakistan is heavily involved in opium trade and Azerbaijan is a transit way to European and American markets for opium and heroin.

Thanks for your comments.

[jgk3]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

you're right that oslonor rejects all the input we have to give for discussion. You're right that he ruins the vibe around here, especially being under Armenian politics, I'll consider moving his thread somewhere else. I think intellectual discussion isn't a bad idea, considering that people like arabaliozian post there too, and if anyone wanted to look for how flawed oslonor's arguments and approach to "discussion" are, they don't have to travel very far to see the format of discussion you can find in the other threads.

[Armanen]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

does it really take that much effort?

You're missing the point. Not to mention the absurd theories being spread, but that fact that quite a number of members feel the same way as I do. The bot is ruining the vibe of the forum, its persence here isn't to create progressive discussion, but to propagate some f*cked up theory.

[jgk3]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

does it really take that much effort?

[Armanen]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

Well, so long as his content stays in one place where we can shoot it down, as I said already, I don't see the problem.

What is the point of it being here? How many times do we have to "shoot" down his pseudo anthropological theories?

[jgk3]

Re: Neo Iranians: The Case of Azeri Turks

Well, so long as his content stays in one place where we can shoot it down, as I said already, I don't see the problem.