Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Bush nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by ckBejug (...) Anyway, being nominated isn't that big a deal since every member of all the world's parliaments, university professors from law to theology, ex-winners and committee members can submit names.
    Yeah, I agree. It's just previsionnal opinion manipulations ...
    It's like "we nominated J.Paul 2, Nelson Mandela, (...), G. Bush, ... (yet other pious ppl)".

    Doing as no one would fail noticing him, yet thinking that it wasn't under ppl's noze to make the source more trusted and to avoid any media manipulation.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by ckBejug Where do we find 'valid' news?
      You want to strenghten you french ?
      HERE is a very valid source:

      http://www.courrierinternational.com

      Internation real news

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by ckBejug Where do we find 'valid' news?
        ck say hello to http://www.npr.org/

        NPR (National Public Radio) 100% member supported

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by patlajan ck say hello to http://www.npr.org/

          NPR (National Public Radio) 100% member supported
          Ok, guess it's a good thing I already knew about NPR, hmmmmmm? Alright.
          The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by patlajan ck say hello to http://www.npr.org/

            NPR (National Public Radio) 100% member supported
            So I read the article there about Bush's probe into WHY they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Does anyone else think this is a MASSIVE waste of money? They could just give me the money, I'll tell them why. Ready? Because there were never any to begin with! Esh en as martige man. Seriously they must think American people are so dumb, and sadly, it seems, American people ARE so dumb because the fact that this blithering idiot is still our president doesn't seem to bug anyone that much. Arghh. Apathy kills me. We need a new president, and fast. The November elections better hurry up and get here already. Also, it looks like Tony Blair is opening up an investigation too as to why no weapons were found. Give me a break.....
            The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by patlajan Never any to begin with? Umm helloooo 1991 wasn't that long ago.
              It was long enough ago that they got rid of them, right? I mean this time around. They didn't find any because there weren't any.
              The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by ckBejug So I read the article there about Bush's probe into WHY they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Does anyone else think this is a MASSIVE waste of money? They could just give me the money, I'll tell them why. Ready? Because there were never any to begin with! Esh en as martige man. Seriously they must think American people are so dumb, and sadly, it seems, American people ARE so dumb because the fact that this blithering idiot is still our president doesn't seem to bug anyone that much. Arghh. Apathy kills me. We need a new president, and fast. The November elections better hurry up and get here already. Also, it looks like Tony Blair is opening up an investigation too as to why no weapons were found. Give me a break.....
                The problem is that all this foreign politic is also a mean to hijack attention from many other things.

                Namely:
                -Kyoto treaty, which is far from being respected by USA.
                http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=479418
                http://www.guardian.co.uk/conservati...118282,00.html

                -The end of arm race with Russia. USA now sollicitating a renewal of the arm race against Russia and China
                - Dangerous connections with both Pekin and Taiwan
                - A fear of the north corea (funded), and a forced heading of the north-south corean connection.

                -USA internal financial disaster:
                NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/08/business/08FUND.html

                Many other things that actually i'm not able to name nor to talk about...

                So, there is not only Irak and Saddam with a bankrupted army...

                Comment


                • #58
                  America's Finest News Source


                  Good satirical news.

                  www.lewrockwell.com (if you're right leaning )
                  www.rense.com (if you're conspiracy leaning)
                  www.counterpunch.org (if you're left leaning)

                  I'd consider those pretty 'alternative'.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by ckBejug So I read the article there about Bush's probe into WHY they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Does anyone else think this is a MASSIVE waste of money? They could just give me the money, I'll tell them why. Ready? Because there were never any to begin with! Esh en as martige man. Seriously they must think American people are so dumb, and sadly, it seems, American people ARE so dumb because the fact that this blithering idiot is still our president doesn't seem to bug anyone that much. Arghh. Apathy kills me. We need a new president, and fast. The November elections better hurry up and get here already. Also, it looks like Tony Blair is opening up an investigation too as to why no weapons were found. Give me a break.....
                    Here:
                    http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/01/28/kay.transcript/



                    In this speech again, France is said to be a wimp.
                    I dislike the attitude of putting everybody in his own misjudgment.

                    The reasons why France didn't engage in the Irak war is simply that it trusted ONU inspectors and decision. Onu to prove the existence of a real threat, the participation would have been taken.

                    Besides, I do not think that France gov. thought that Irak was a real threat. However, french military forces were present (some fellows being in army), and even if it's hard to believe, were indirectly backing american forces.

                    What Bush expected the most is a financial participation. One of the biggest threat for the USA is actually the Euro currency. The war is no more military, but essencially financial.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      the best (satirical/parody) website:



                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X