Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by ckBejug (...) Anyway, being nominated isn't that big a deal since every member of all the world's parliaments, university professors from law to theology, ex-winners and committee members can submit names.
    Yeah, I agree. It's just previsionnal opinion manipulations ...
    It's like "we nominated J.Paul 2, Nelson Mandela, (...), G. Bush, ... (yet other pious ppl)".

    Doing as no one would fail noticing him, yet thinking that it wasn't under ppl's noze to make the source more trusted and to avoid any media manipulation.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by ckBejug Where do we find 'valid' news?
      You want to strenghten you french ?
      HERE is a very valid source:

      http://www.courrierinternational.com

      Internation real news

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by ckBejug Where do we find 'valid' news?
        ck say hello to http://www.npr.org/

        NPR (National Public Radio) 100% member supported

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by patlajan ck say hello to http://www.npr.org/

          NPR (National Public Radio) 100% member supported
          Ok, guess it's a good thing I already knew about NPR, hmmmmmm? Alright.
          The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by patlajan ck say hello to http://www.npr.org/

            NPR (National Public Radio) 100% member supported
            So I read the article there about Bush's probe into WHY they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Does anyone else think this is a MASSIVE waste of money? They could just give me the money, I'll tell them why. Ready? Because there were never any to begin with! Esh en as martige man. Seriously they must think American people are so dumb, and sadly, it seems, American people ARE so dumb because the fact that this blithering idiot is still our president doesn't seem to bug anyone that much. Arghh. Apathy kills me. We need a new president, and fast. The November elections better hurry up and get here already. Also, it looks like Tony Blair is opening up an investigation too as to why no weapons were found. Give me a break.....
            The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by patlajan Never any to begin with? Umm helloooo 1991 wasn't that long ago.
              It was long enough ago that they got rid of them, right? I mean this time around. They didn't find any because there weren't any.
              The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by ckBejug So I read the article there about Bush's probe into WHY they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Does anyone else think this is a MASSIVE waste of money? They could just give me the money, I'll tell them why. Ready? Because there were never any to begin with! Esh en as martige man. Seriously they must think American people are so dumb, and sadly, it seems, American people ARE so dumb because the fact that this blithering idiot is still our president doesn't seem to bug anyone that much. Arghh. Apathy kills me. We need a new president, and fast. The November elections better hurry up and get here already. Also, it looks like Tony Blair is opening up an investigation too as to why no weapons were found. Give me a break.....
                The problem is that all this foreign politic is also a mean to hijack attention from many other things.

                Namely:
                -Kyoto treaty, which is far from being respected by USA.
                http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=479418
                http://www.guardian.co.uk/conservati...118282,00.html

                -The end of arm race with Russia. USA now sollicitating a renewal of the arm race against Russia and China
                - Dangerous connections with both Pekin and Taiwan
                - A fear of the north corea (funded), and a forced heading of the north-south corean connection.

                -USA internal financial disaster:
                NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/08/business/08FUND.html

                Many other things that actually i'm not able to name nor to talk about...

                So, there is not only Irak and Saddam with a bankrupted army...

                Comment


                • #58
                  America's Finest News Source


                  Good satirical news.

                  www.lewrockwell.com (if you're right leaning )
                  www.rense.com (if you're conspiracy leaning)
                  www.counterpunch.org (if you're left leaning)

                  I'd consider those pretty 'alternative'.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by ckBejug So I read the article there about Bush's probe into WHY they didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Does anyone else think this is a MASSIVE waste of money? They could just give me the money, I'll tell them why. Ready? Because there were never any to begin with! Esh en as martige man. Seriously they must think American people are so dumb, and sadly, it seems, American people ARE so dumb because the fact that this blithering idiot is still our president doesn't seem to bug anyone that much. Arghh. Apathy kills me. We need a new president, and fast. The November elections better hurry up and get here already. Also, it looks like Tony Blair is opening up an investigation too as to why no weapons were found. Give me a break.....
                    Here:
                    http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/01/28/kay.transcript/



                    In this speech again, France is said to be a wimp.
                    I dislike the attitude of putting everybody in his own misjudgment.

                    The reasons why France didn't engage in the Irak war is simply that it trusted ONU inspectors and decision. Onu to prove the existence of a real threat, the participation would have been taken.

                    Besides, I do not think that France gov. thought that Irak was a real threat. However, french military forces were present (some fellows being in army), and even if it's hard to believe, were indirectly backing american forces.

                    What Bush expected the most is a financial participation. One of the biggest threat for the USA is actually the Euro currency. The war is no more military, but essencially financial.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      the best (satirical/parody) website:



                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X