Gay Marriages

[violette829]

I voted NO because of what I saw last week. I never used to care about homosexuals because I thought that they had just as many rights as we did. That is until I went to a concert last week and saw what changed my mind. Dude..that place was like 75% lesbians.. Evanescence concert. WowWW. Alright....they were holding hands, which is fine...but they just would NOT stop making out and licking eachother's face...and just basically trying to get more attention..."OH LOOK AT ME..I'M GAY!" It's like...normal couples don't do that....why should they be excused from the unwritten rules on public behavior? THEY SHOULDN'T! I don't agree with this at ALL. I know most of them are getting married for the tax benefits...I knew a gay guy who told me this. Most of them really aren't into the whole institution of marriage. Another thing...the entire idea of marriage is to start a family. I don't know what you all think...but 2 men cannot have a baby! It's just soooo complicated...we can't just let them do whatever they want. It'll be utter chaos and lead to a diminishing respect for the church..and the idea of marriage. How sad!

[felizitation]

Originally posted by violette829 I voted NO because of what I saw last week. I never used to care about homosexuals because I thought that they had just as many rights as we did. That is until I went to a concert last week and saw what changed my mind. Dude..that place was like 75% lesbians.. Evanescence concert. WowWW. Alright....they were holding hands, which is fine...but they just would NOT stop making out and licking eachother's face...and just basically trying to get more attention..."OH LOOK AT ME..I'M GAY!" It's like...normal couples don't do that....why should they be excused from the unwritten rules on public behavior? THEY SHOULDN'T! I don't agree with this at ALL. I know most of them are getting married for the tax benefits...I knew a gay guy who told me this. Most of them really aren't into the whole institution of marriage. Another thing...the entire idea of marriage is to start a family. I don't know what you all think...but 2 men cannot have a baby! It's just soooo complicated...we can't just let them do whatever they want. It'll be utter chaos and lead to a diminishing respect for the church..and the idea of marriage. How sad!

Well, from your point of view, your disgust seems to justify your answer. However, you made a big point on the fact that marriage is highly correlated with religion.
But :
- Marriage nowadays does not necessarly mean "religious" marriage
- Many heterosexual couple get married also for the taxes

But the question of having kids for homosexual (through adoption for instance) is another problem, don't you think ?

I see through this a will to make a community more "society compliant", since it's still looking for an identity, an acceptance, and some room. So i would have tend to answer "no", not for the same reasons as exposed here.

But their sexuality doesn't concern me, and an unsignificant marriage in a city hall doesn't bother me.
I answered "yes".



PS.: For tigran: gay men are potential soldiers, regarding the way they take care of their body

[dstyle]

adam and eve
not
adam and steve.

thank you im here all week

[felizitation]

Originally posted by dstyle adam and eve
not
adam and steve.

thank you im here all week

(s)Adam and (st)eve weren't married. Marriage was created because of sin.
Greek ppl were homosexual in the past, and it was "cultural". Then religion came, and said "this is not for reproduction, so this is unnatural", and made a brain wash that is lasting till today.

Yes, but pleasure is natural. Let ppl do wahatever they want with their body. The question is obviously not there, it's about society.
"Open up" (pun intended) your mind.

[SagGal]

i vote "NO" because it is not the way human nature is. In fact, it is ruining human nature. Like it or not, if everyone in the world were homosexuals......what happened to the world? Marriage is also a religious occasion that has been between a woman and a man for so many years. It's like changing something about a religion. Some homosexuals may argue saying, "what if we're not religious?" Then why the hell even consider marriage if it is religious. Basically, they want to be able to get married because of those marriage benefits. I say "NO" on Gay Marriages but maybe they can change something about the benefits or find a some sort of compromise. But "NO" change on marriage because it is such a beautiful thing.



feliz, what religion r u? if any religion at all.

[fstkhnan]

Originally posted by SagGal i vote "NO" because it is not the way human nature is. In fact, it is ruining human nature. Like it or not, if everyone in the world were homosexuals......what happened to the world? Marriage is also a religious occasion that has been between a woman and a man for so many years. It's like changing something about a religion. Some homosexuals may argue saying, "what if we're not religious?" Then why the hell even consider marriage if it is religious. Basically, they want to be able to get married because of those marriage benefits. I say "NO" on Gay Marriages but maybe they can change something about the benefits or find a some sort of compromise. But "NO" change on marriage because it is such a beautiful thing.



feliz, what religion r u? if any religion at all.

I agree with this statement!

[Hogg]

I vote no.....as in, "no, I don't really care whether they get married or not."

[fstkhnan]

Originally posted by Hogg I vote no.....as in, "no, I don't really care whether they get married or not."

I think everybody should care, its gonna mess up or it already is messing up our society.....but thats just what i think!

[sSsflamesSs]

I'm not advocating homosexuality, but heck, society is messed up without the help of homosexuality.

[fstkhnan]

Originally posted by sSsflamesSs I'm not advocating homosexuality, but heck, society is messed up without the help of homosexuality.

but this way, its just gonna get worse!