Gay Marriages

[Deviance]

LIKE IT OR NOT such things as "having children" was worldly and commonly customary. It is for that reason that it is accepted because it serves an important purpose. If the whole world was gay, we would decrease in population because people eventually die and gays obviously cannot reproduce. That is what Anony and myself are saying that it fails to WORK. Meaning it is something centered on self-hedonistic motives that has no significance whatsoever. THE PROCESS that is (in case you tamper with my facts again).

[loseyourname]

Adam are you honestly trying to test me? I just said I DO APPLY THEM TO ALL GAY OR STRAIGHT, however there are certain limits based upon the examples you gave. "A black person or handicapped." That is not a valid argument in this case. That is like me arguing to earn your position as a Moderator saying "but are we both not AC chatters? Big wow we have a different preference." Obviously, you will have your reasons to testify. This particular issue is not as subjective as you think. That is where I am getting at.

You didn't answer a single question that I asked in my last post. Please do. If you do, you will have clarified everything that I wanted clarified and we can move on.

[Deviance]

You're discriminating because you condemn homosexuals that do not raise families, but you will not condemn heterosexuals that do not raise families. Did you only read the last paragraph of his post? Did you honestly miss the half-page he devoted to explaining why it is that you are discriminating?

Look, let me ask this because you really should think not twice but thrice before accusing me of that. What does the term "condemn" mean? Do you know what it means?

[loseyourname]

LIKE IT OR NOT such things as "having children" was worldly and commonly customary. It is for that reason that it is accepted because it serves an important purpose. If the whole world was gay, we would decrease in population because people eventually die and gays obviously cannot reproduce. That is what Anony and myself are saying that it fails to WORK. Meaning it is something centered on self-hedonistic motives that has no significance whatsoever. THE PROCESS that is (in case you tamper with my facts again).

Then you do condemn a heterosexual couple that chooses to not have children? Or a man that chooses to marry an infertile woman?

[loseyourname]

Look, let me ask this because you really should think not twice but thrice before accusing me of that. What does the term "condemn" mean? Do you know what it means?

All I mean by condemn is that you judge it as immoral. Now that you know that, can you now please all of the questions that have been asked of you? I swear to god that we can end this once you have. I don't want to argue with or change your mind. I only want to fully understand your position. Is that so much to ask?

[Deviance]

You didn't answer a single question that I asked in my last post. Please do. If you do, you will have clarified everything that I wanted clarified and we can move on.

I did answer it, read carefully. I just told you your postulation is wrong because of THAT reason and I can't stress this enough.

[loseyourname]

Are you judging all hedonistic acts as immoral, all non-functional acts as immoral, or all acts that are both hedonistic and non-functional as immoral? Just answer that one question. All you have to do is answer yes to one criterion, tell me which one that is, and answer no to the other two. This is very simple. Please do it.

[Deviance]

All I mean by condemn is that you judge it as immoral. Now that you know that, can you now please all of the questions that have been asked of you? I swear to god that we can end this once you have. I don't want to argue with or change your mind. I only want to fully understand your position. Is that so much to ask?

NO that is not what it is. Wrong. To condemn means to DECLARE to be GUILTY or unfit for USE.
"All I mean by condemn is that you judge it as immoral."
Yes thank you, welcome to the world of debating. We each choose either a side or back up our points. I cannot answer your open-ended questions with just one simple "yes" or "no." I just told you BECAUSE I AM forbiding homosexuality I am giving THOSE (observe posts) reasons as to why I am.

[Deviance]

Are you judging all hedonistic acts as immoral, all non-functional acts as immoral, or all acts that are both hedonistic and non-functional as immoral? Just answer that one question. All you have to do is answer yes to one criterion, tell me which one that is, and answer no to the other two. This is very simple. Please do it.

Umm I told you I cannot just answer this sort of thing with a simple "yes" or "no." Why are you tempting me to be redundant now?

[loseyourname]

Are you judging any act that fits (insert criterion here) as immoral? Is not an open-ended question. It is a very simple yes or no question. Forget it though. If I can't even establish what your position is, then I can't discuss it. It isn't that important.