Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Race

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Race

    Despite the current ideologically biased state of academia, race is a real thing. It is not a "social construct" as many claim it to be. The first obvious objection to race is it is visible to us. It is alive and speaks to us in bloodtypes and genotypes; in culture and civilization. Despite current efforts at trying to subdue any talk of the reality of race due to egalitarian fiction and fraud, I will address the issue of race. Race is biological. It is the biological differences found amongst different peoples. Culture and civilization are a reflection of that given people, as each civilization is unique to those people. This does not mean that one should hate someone blindly because they are of a different race, this only means that no one is alike, and differences pervade as the rule, not the exception, and the achivement and civilization of different peoples is tied to their race. The egalitarian police will have you believe that to talk of racial differences means one is automatically a hate monger. That is untrue propaganda propogated by non other than the racial equality polizei who themselves wish to stifle any criticism of their egalitarian fiction. With that being said no one is "pure", and differences are in degrees, and not in kind, i.e. some are "purer" than others ( England, Japan for example ).

    With that said, I think we should first clear the issue around the ambiguiqity of "equality". Many contend that "we are all equal", yet cannot see that nature itself has chiseled great inequalities of minds, of strengths, of characters, and capacities. What is "equality"? It means the quality of being the same in quantity or measure or value or status. With that definition, what can we point to in nature where that definition applies to? It is a fact of nature that no two things are alike, and that no two humans are alike. We can extend this to different racial groups and see the same results. The fact that different racial groups produced different civilizations, is itself evidence of racial inequalities, not equalities, of superiors and inferiors, which simply means higher ranked or quality. When we take this further and state that Asians and Jews by far are the most intelligent as evidenced by IQ, followed by whites intermediate, then blacks we are told we are racist and IQ is "not reliable" and "biased" and/or "racist". Yet we don't need IQ to determine the differneces in racial groups all we can do is point to the different civilizations and see the capacity of each racial group in their development. For the purposes of clarity I will use "Mongoloid" and "Caucasoid" and "Negroid" as basic terms long ago abandoned by the new egalitarian "science". Thus it is no wonder that the premise of many modern ideologies, from Marxism, to Socialism, to Communism, to Civil Rights, to political correctness, all are in some way, shape or form, based on this assumption of "equality", or achieving that desired state.

    To know science, we must understand science. Science, like anything else, is a social institution surrounded by an abundance of misunderstanding, even among those who are a part of the "scientific community". We think that science is an institution, a set of methods, a set of people, a great body of knowledge, and we call that scientific, and that somehow is apart from the forces that rule our everyday lives and that govern the structure of our society. We think science is objective, just like we think journalism is objective, or at least ought to be, but they are not. Science is greatly influenced by the structure of all our other social institutions, and the ideas that pervade the ruling circles. The problems that science entangles are ideas that it uses in investigating those problems, even the so clled scientific results that come out of scientific investigation, are all influenced by preconceived ideas and predispositions that derive from society in which we live. Scientists don't start life as scientists, but as social beings, immersed in a family, a state, and the ideological structure that pervades.

    It then follows that science is molded by society because it is guided by those who have and control time and money. People earn their living with science as it uses commodity so people rely on their living for science. As a side effect, the dominant social and economic forces in society will determine to a large extent what science does and how it does it. That the current science trumpets the claim of "racial egalitarianism", or "egalitarianism" in general, goes hand in hand with the biased media such as the NYT that would report such things regarding race and the human genome that "race is nothing more than skin deep" ( NYT August 22, 2000 ). It is the control and influence of what scientsits do and say, and the use what scientists do and say to support the institutions of society, i.e. "diversity is our strength", endless "immigration", "egalitarian legislations" such as affirmitive action, forced integration and assimilation, etc.

    That Mongoloids are by far more intelligent with a higher response time, than Caucasoids who in turn are higher than Negroids is indeed evidence of racial inequality, and an idea of superiorty or inferiorty. Moreover, in the bestseller, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life by by Richard J. Herrnstein, Charles Murray, we see evidence of how success is dependent on intelligence and the different groups that comprise this society. Although the authors were careful in their efforts of trying to show the correlation between intelligence and success, by cloaking their argument in "class", and not race, they nonetheless were smeared all over the media and egalitarian circles.

    The further fact that some groups are more violent than others is itself a result of "race" and not "socio-economic" causes, as is common in this day and age of Marxian-lite sociology. That blacks or Negroids are by far the most violent in society is not a "racist" statement, it is a realistic statement. The fact that someone who walks by a black man feels "threatened", is not because he/she is racist or hateful, but because he she knows and realizes blacks are the most violent and hence is careful. Such discrmination is the natural, rather the cognitive ability of humans to differentiate. This is not "racist", aside from the "egalitarians" making it "racist", an all encompassing smear label used for anything and everything to stifle and silence those whom dare to critique the egalitarian wisdom.

    The fact that blacks on average have higher levels of testosterone than Caucasoids or Mongoloids, shows why they are more violent, as testosterone and aggression provide a clear link, as any non egalitarian psychologist will tell you. The fact that men are more violent than women is itself grounded in testosterone, and why more younger men committ crimes than older men. We can see the evidence of the disproportionate involvement of blacks in crime by U.S. Government statistics.

    Anyone who visits the U.S. Department of Justice can see this too:

    Last edited by Anonymouse; 03-12-2004, 03:47 PM.
    Achkerov kute.

  • #2
    HAHAHAHAHA! Finally! I have to admit I haven't done enough research, but give me some time and I shall sort it out. I don't want to engage in a display of pompous and subjective views.

    Comment


    • #3
      Research all you want, facts are facts
      Achkerov kute.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Anonymouse Research all you want, facts are facts
        Sure sure Anon...

        Since genetic is one of my favored subjects, can you be glad to present me any works you have read that will give you any credentials to write about "races"? I am interested to discuss about this but considering what happened the last time at the other forum(your total ignorance of the subject you wanted to discuss about) I do not want to waste my time.
        Last edited by Fadix; 03-13-2004, 02:00 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Fadix Sure sure Anon...

          Since genetic is one of my favored subjects, can you be glad to present me any works you have read that will give you any credentials to write about "races"? I am interested to discuss about this but considering what happened the last time at the other forum(your total ignorance of the subject you wanted to discuss about) I do not want to waste my time.
          Ahhh the infamous "you were ignorant that is why I couldn't discuss" defense. If you want to discuss, nothing is preventing you from discussing, so stop with the pretensious "I'm a scholar and you know nothing" attitude of conceit. Before asking me for credentials, present your first, as only the nerfbrains pretend to ask. Credentials are not a prerequisite to making threads or posts. If you have an argument present it, otherwise stop beating around the bush Mr. Fadix.
          Achkerov kute.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Darorinag I thought mentioning the "other" forum was not allowed on this board. Mods?
            Hey let's not get off topic please. Confine such comments to PMs, this is no chat room forum.
            Achkerov kute.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Anonymouse Ahhh the infamous "you were ignorant that is why I couldn't discuss" defense. If you want to discuss, nothing is preventing you from discussing, so stop with the pretensious "I'm a scholar and you know nothing" attitude of conceit. Before asking me for credentials, present your first, as only the nerfbrains pretend to ask. Credentials are not a prerequisite to making threads or posts. If you have an argument present it, otherwise stop beating around the bush Mr. Fadix.
              When one treat about a such a sensitive subject, one ought to be more cautious. Right Anon? I have not claimed to be a scholar here, I just expect to know your references, the works which would support what you claim. Is that too much asking? Will I have an answer, or as usual you will start your rhetoric that your interlocutor has a big ego and is an arrogant know it all?

              Comment


              • #8
                Fadix, for starters:

                RACE, EVOLUTION, AND BEHAVIOR: A Life History Perspective

                Professor J. Philippe Rushton
                University of Western Ontario

                ISBN: 0-9656836-2-1

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Fadix When one treat about a such a sensitive subject, one ought to be more cautious. Right Anon? I have not claimed to be a scholar here, I just expect to know your references, the works which would support what you claim. Is that too much asking? Will I have an answer, or as usual you will start your rhetoric that your interlocutor has a big ego and is an arrogant know it all?
                  Sensitive subject? Why is it sensitive? Because it threatens to crumble the egalitarian world view? If you are going to contend that races are equal, please tell us how, beacuse reality says otherwise.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Fadix, I suggest you provide some insight into this issue instead of merely claiming that this is a sensitive issue. Why should we be cautious? Facts are facts. What's next, denying facts because it might offend some people?

                    Do provide some arguments as to why you might think that there are no "races."

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X