Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evolution and Religion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • loseyourname
    replied
    My only assumption is that bio students have a requisite amount of knowledge pertaining to the subject and might have something to contribute. You needn't be fanatical.

    Leave a comment:


  • sSsflamesSs
    replied
    I think it's a headache, and you guys are proving this.

    And what the hell is up with the assumption that bio students are evolution fanatics?

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    Little miss Flamer - you're a bio student, no? What do you think about all this?

    Leave a comment:


  • sSsflamesSs
    replied
    Originally posted by loseyourname It has been mentioned before. I have said it several times.
    My bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    It has been mentioned before. I have said it several times.

    Leave a comment:


  • sSsflamesSs
    replied
    I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but has it ever occurred to you guys that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive but can coexist?

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    Evolution has an evidential basis, and both Gould and Dawkins have shown it quite well. Your belief in God is based entirely on personal conviction, much like the belief of the young earthers. In addition, nothing about evolution rules out creation. I don't see your conflict.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anonymouse
    replied
    Originally posted by loseyourname I apologize. It is a scientific fact, as certain as relativity or thermodynamics.
    That's where I can safely say, you're wrong.

    Evolution is no where near the laws of thermodynamics.

    It is just a guess with faith on how we got here, no different than God.

    How you seek to establish evolutions holyness, I have yet to encounter. If people like Hawkins, or Gould couldn't, what will you present they overlooked? Or is this just your opinion with faith, no different than I, believing God created all?

    You can state all you want, evolution is not a fact, because its truth cannot be proven, beyond a certain limit of what can prove.

    Micro and macro are two different things. How one leads to another is only assumed and imagined.

    Leave a comment:


  • loseyourname
    replied
    I apologize. It is a scientific fact, as certain as relativity or thermodynamics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Anonymouse
    replied
    Originally posted by loseyourname There are no anatomical correlations between a horse and a car. Of course every scientific theory is open to revision. Evolution is pretty damn soundproof, but still, it is not completely certain. Nothing is. What exactly is it that you're expecting here?
    Then if it is not certain, why are you saying that one cannot doubt it?

    You contradict yourself.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X