Re: notes / comments
So, let me get this straight, you are comparing the "uniqueness" of a people to a snowflake and grain of sand (i.e. "every tribe is unique, so is the color blue"), which equates to saying, "so what if we are 'unique', snow flakes and a grain of sand are 'unique' too", but then are claiming that you "want [me] to decide" if it is a asset or liabilty when your initial statements has already made it a point to the reader that being unique should hold no importance to your life, thus, implying that it is not a asset? By your reasoning, being unique is either "useless" or a "liability, so, please, stop with the "holier than thou" presentation of your argument of attemping to give the reader a "choice".
You are a walking contradiction and a idiot. First of all, you yourself, as a "Canadian" are "unique", if anyone needs to listen to the "words of the ol'might Ara Baliozian", it is Ara Baliozian himself because he holds a Canadian citizenship, i.e. he is "unique".
Second of all, the idea of being "unique" is not a "mutually exclusive" trait that one can get shake off. Essentially, being unique is a quality every individual possesses. On a micro you speak a "unique" language, you partake in a "unique" culture, you have "unique" beleifs, and you most likly deficate in a "unique" manner when you go to the john to release yourself. Likewise, on the macro level, you have a "unque" citizenship, you pay taxes towards a "unque" government, you reside in a "unique" state, and essentially, your loyalties are to a "unique" entitty. Therefore, this idea that you can somehow distance yourself from being "unique" is a flawed concept. Being "unique" is not a button you can take on and off, it is who you are, for better of for worse, you are, who you are.
The reality is this, you are sitting in the comforts of your home, under the protection of a state, that most likely on the daily basis is engraining into to your psychology the idea of being "connected" to the state (i.e. you are a Canadian). And since you are not a Inuit, you must adhere to being Canadian. So, how is wanting to be Canadian any different then, let us I don't know say, being Armenian? Well, it is different in that the previous is a national identity, while the latter is, first, a ethnic identity, and second a new national identity, however, they are similar in that both are a "unique" identity.
Now, your claim that "uniqueness" is a liability will disarm the Armenian individual in the Diaspora because at the heart, if they take your advice and stop being Armenian for the sake of becoming a "world citizen" it only means then that they will rely on the national identity (i.e. being American, Canadian, and etc ... ) to dictate their "uniqueness", thus, your argument only bolsters assimilation, marginalization, and, again, it is a "idea" that destroy the power with a Armenian to create his or her own destiny.
The end game is this, because you can never wash away your Armenian "uniqueness" you will eventually finally realize who you are and try to back assimilate bringing all the foreign residue into the Armenian communities. And it is at this moment that extrapollated will destroy the inherit "uniqness" of the Armenian people. What you champion will only provide mass marketers and corporations more fresh meat to pawn their make shift identities to, you are indirectly supporting corporations. So you are at the heart taking the Armenian out of a "lions den" and putting him or her directly in the lions mouth.
Ha, "Chauvinist crapola" no, realist that has real ideas, ideas that for the most part that are not so much different to the ideas that have contributed to the development of the Canadian state, a state which you reside in, pay taxes to, and eventually will be buried in. I don't ask to be "anyone's guide", I only defend my interests and values, something alien to a walking vaginal like yourself that for all of his life has contributed to 0% of the development of the Armenian state and people, but instead has indirectly undermined the self determination of the Armenian people with ridiculous idealistic ideas in a age that is devoid of any idealism.
The only problems Armenians face today are demotivation and incidently, demotivation that has its roots in views and opinions you preach. The idea that Armenians should just bend over and screw them. Instead of empowering your people, you are just taking away their political handgun by leading them into isolation with your talks of "identity" being somehow "not important".
The reality is this, you are a chicken xxxx individual that hides behind quotes and ideas of true intellectual giants. All you have done is just hide behind meaningless and empty ideas that have no actual value to anyone but you and your ego. You are not even the dirt underneath the nail of a Monte, Andranik, and Nejda. Your not even a Newton who acknowledges that his greatness can be attributed to giants (i.e. "I can only see so far, because I stand on the shoulders of giant") and furthermore, you are not even the entity that Plato refers to who will free his or her fellow man that is stuck in the cave watching shadows (i.e. Allegory of the Cave) because you are not brave enough to take risks nor are you brave enough to confront people for their wrong doings, all you do is analyze the shortcomings of other men for trying to change the world.
All you, the "Ara type" end up doing is contributing to the stagnation of the Armenian people and to the larger extent to the human race. The reality is that we are all different whether we choose to accept or not and the moment the world government realizes this and the moment you realize this, is the moment mankind can better themselves by seeking out a solution that will address this fundimental trait of the human condition.
Understand, Armenians failed to listen to your advice not so much so because they or some shadow entity wants to silence you, rather, they fail to listen to you because your ideas are a bit "behind on the times". The reality is that the "one world" ideology in which you preach died the moment the Soviet Union disintegrated, this is a fact most politicians in the western world adhere to. If man is man and their exists no difference then why did your fellow "human" Turks and Azeris try to annex land that for the most part, was no theirs and certainly, was already occupied by Armenians.
And I am a staunch socialist, however, the reality is this, the reality is that in the world where capitalism rule, where everyone is competeting with one another, you would be a fool to convince your people to be more "worldly" when in fact the world revolves around markets, competition, and is based on the "idea of scales", when one man eats, another man starves. Let us at least, at minimum, be the man that does not starve.
Yes and why do you think so? Because people have different opinions, feelings, and interests. Furthermore, the idea that "corruption" and "authoritarianism" is evil and wrong when in fact our civilization has stemmed from the barbarism of men that have been corrupt and authoritarians is just horse xxxx. Man will always be intolerant to one another because men are born different and develop differently as a they age. This is the price you pay for being different, however, it is a well payed investment. Difference is a normal part of nature, the abnormal is when individuals are the same, when two people, on opposite cornor of the world, are exact duplicates of each other. That is when the world stops being "amazing" and starts being mundane. I would rather have intolerance but a fresh sense of "difference" that has not been corrupted by mass marketing, cultural polution stemming from mass marketers, inter racial sludge, inter ethnic sludge, and etc. opposed to everyone coming off the corporate assembly line.
First, there exists no shortcomings that is mutuall exclusive to the Armenian people that is not inherit in other people and certainly, not inherit in other states. The moment I will give up being "who I am" and, as you say, "overcome" the "shortcomings", is the day eastern and western states like China and United States stop forcing their people to adopt one race, one ethnicity, and one culture. You should ask the Tibeten people how they feel about the "overcoming" of the "shortcomings" imposed by the Chinese government onto to them via or the Armenians in Georgia that are not given eqaul treatment as Georgian citizens. The sad difference here is that while you have a oppurtunity to be who you are, the Armenians in Georgia do not, and essentially, you are pissing away this privalage because you have your head too far up your ass to see the picture clearly.
And again, speaking for myself, I am calling you a phony, a coward, a failed writer, and, in total, your life's work is crap. It is useless to any Armenian, in any form, whether on the internet or in a book. There is no "phony wheeler-dealer" but yourself, Ara, this is reality. You live in the margins of your egos instead of the real world. I have tried to reason with you on many occasions, but on every level you are just useless. The ideas you promote will end up destroying the hard of work of other men that put themselves on the line versus you, that just sits there and writes, who for the most part, has spent 72 years of his life just talking out of his ass.
Originally posted by Esh
View Post
Originally posted by Esh
You are a walking contradiction and a idiot. First of all, you yourself, as a "Canadian" are "unique", if anyone needs to listen to the "words of the ol'might Ara Baliozian", it is Ara Baliozian himself because he holds a Canadian citizenship, i.e. he is "unique".
Second of all, the idea of being "unique" is not a "mutually exclusive" trait that one can get shake off. Essentially, being unique is a quality every individual possesses. On a micro you speak a "unique" language, you partake in a "unique" culture, you have "unique" beleifs, and you most likly deficate in a "unique" manner when you go to the john to release yourself. Likewise, on the macro level, you have a "unque" citizenship, you pay taxes towards a "unque" government, you reside in a "unique" state, and essentially, your loyalties are to a "unique" entitty. Therefore, this idea that you can somehow distance yourself from being "unique" is a flawed concept. Being "unique" is not a button you can take on and off, it is who you are, for better of for worse, you are, who you are.
The reality is this, you are sitting in the comforts of your home, under the protection of a state, that most likely on the daily basis is engraining into to your psychology the idea of being "connected" to the state (i.e. you are a Canadian). And since you are not a Inuit, you must adhere to being Canadian. So, how is wanting to be Canadian any different then, let us I don't know say, being Armenian? Well, it is different in that the previous is a national identity, while the latter is, first, a ethnic identity, and second a new national identity, however, they are similar in that both are a "unique" identity.
Now, your claim that "uniqueness" is a liability will disarm the Armenian individual in the Diaspora because at the heart, if they take your advice and stop being Armenian for the sake of becoming a "world citizen" it only means then that they will rely on the national identity (i.e. being American, Canadian, and etc ... ) to dictate their "uniqueness", thus, your argument only bolsters assimilation, marginalization, and, again, it is a "idea" that destroy the power with a Armenian to create his or her own destiny.
The end game is this, because you can never wash away your Armenian "uniqueness" you will eventually finally realize who you are and try to back assimilate bringing all the foreign residue into the Armenian communities. And it is at this moment that extrapollated will destroy the inherit "uniqness" of the Armenian people. What you champion will only provide mass marketers and corporations more fresh meat to pawn their make shift identities to, you are indirectly supporting corporations. So you are at the heart taking the Armenian out of a "lions den" and putting him or her directly in the lions mouth.
Originally posted by Esh
Originally posted by Esh
The reality is this, you are a chicken xxxx individual that hides behind quotes and ideas of true intellectual giants. All you have done is just hide behind meaningless and empty ideas that have no actual value to anyone but you and your ego. You are not even the dirt underneath the nail of a Monte, Andranik, and Nejda. Your not even a Newton who acknowledges that his greatness can be attributed to giants (i.e. "I can only see so far, because I stand on the shoulders of giant") and furthermore, you are not even the entity that Plato refers to who will free his or her fellow man that is stuck in the cave watching shadows (i.e. Allegory of the Cave) because you are not brave enough to take risks nor are you brave enough to confront people for their wrong doings, all you do is analyze the shortcomings of other men for trying to change the world.
All you, the "Ara type" end up doing is contributing to the stagnation of the Armenian people and to the larger extent to the human race. The reality is that we are all different whether we choose to accept or not and the moment the world government realizes this and the moment you realize this, is the moment mankind can better themselves by seeking out a solution that will address this fundimental trait of the human condition.
Understand, Armenians failed to listen to your advice not so much so because they or some shadow entity wants to silence you, rather, they fail to listen to you because your ideas are a bit "behind on the times". The reality is that the "one world" ideology in which you preach died the moment the Soviet Union disintegrated, this is a fact most politicians in the western world adhere to. If man is man and their exists no difference then why did your fellow "human" Turks and Azeris try to annex land that for the most part, was no theirs and certainly, was already occupied by Armenians.
And I am a staunch socialist, however, the reality is this, the reality is that in the world where capitalism rule, where everyone is competeting with one another, you would be a fool to convince your people to be more "worldly" when in fact the world revolves around markets, competition, and is based on the "idea of scales", when one man eats, another man starves. Let us at least, at minimum, be the man that does not starve.
Originally posted by Esh
Originally posted by Esh
Originally posted by Esh
Comment