Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

A World Too Complex To Be Managed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A World Too Complex To Be Managed

    I thought this was an illuminating article by the always enlightened Butler Shaffer.

    A World Too Complex To Be Managed

    by Butler Shaffer


    What an immense mass of evil must result...from allowing men to assume the right of anticipating what may happen.
    ~ Leo Tolstoy

    The cable newscaster chirped: “what is the cause of rising gasoline prices? That depends upon your point of view.” By this standard, the causal explanations offered by any nit-witted galoot achieve a credibility equal to that of the most carefully-informed student of the subject. In an age in which public opinion polls weigh more heavily than empirical and reasoned analyses in evaluating events, the communal mindset of dullards may prevail by sheer numbers.

    If, according to this newscaster, my “point of view” is that sun spots are “the cause of rising gasoline prices,” I have explained the current pricing phenomenon. Because such a theory would exceed the boundaries of what even the collective clueless would tolerate, more plausible – though equally erroneous – explanations must be sought. Those looking for simplistic answers to complex problems will find greater comfort in “oil company price gouging” as the underlying reason for fifty dollar visits to neighborhood gas pumps.

    One of my students – picking up on the “price gouging” theme – opined that monopolistic oil company greed was to blame for these price increases. “First of all,” I responded, “why do you characterize the petroleum industry as ‘monopolistic’? It is highly competitive. Secondly, why do you think that it took a century for ‘greedy’ oil company leaders to figure out that the demand for gasoline was so inelastic that customers would be willing to pay over $3.00 per gallon to buy it? Furthermore, have you ever asked yourself why the prices of gold and oil have consistently paralleled one another over the years? Why do you suppose this is? Has the petroleum industry also cornered the gold market?”

    The eagerness of so many people to accept superficial answers to complex problems, is what keeps the political rackets in business. People are aware that they have insufficient information upon which to make predictions about intricate economic and social relationships and, presuming that the state has access to such knowledge, allow it to take on this role. What these individuals generally fail to understand is that state officials are equally unable to chart or direct the course of complex behavior.

    Current society is rapidly being transformed from vertically-structured, institutionally-dominant systems into horizontally-interconnected networks. Our world is becoming increasingly decentralized, with questions arising as to the forms emerging social systems may take. The study of chaos informs us that the multifaceted, interrelated nature of complex systems render our world unpredictable. As our understanding of chaos deepens, our faith in institutional omniscience will likely be abandoned.

    Our experiences with the state should make us aware of how misplaced has been our confidence in the centralized planning and direction of society. It is commonplace to speak of the “unintended consequences” of political intervention. This is just a way of acknowledging the inconstancy and unpredictable nature of complexity. Minimum wage laws, for instance, create increased unemployment, a problem to which the state responds by the enactment of unemployment compensation legislation. This program, in turn, generates the problem of welfare fraud, to which the state makes further responses. Minimum wage laws increase the costs of doing business, making firms less competitive in a world market. This leads to political pressures to increase protective tariffs and self-righteous campaigns against foreign countries whose economies are not burdened by minimum wage legislation.

    In this sense, politics functions the way much of traditional medicine does: to repress troublesome symptoms with remedies that produce exponential increases in other symptoms requiring additional medications. If you look inside an elderly person’s medicine cabinet and see the many drugs that are used to suppress symptoms brought on by previous drugs, you will see a perfect parallel to the expansion of governmental “solutions” to politicogenic “problems.”

    The succession of problems occasioned by state action is reflected in other areas. Americans who fail to understand the causal relationship between decades of violent American foreign policies and the attacks on the World Trade Center, will be eager to accept such simplistic explanations of 9/11 as the product of “terrorists” bent on destroying America out of “evil” or “envious” motivations. Any deeper inquiry will prove too troublesome for those challenged by complexity, and so they settle for the lies and deceptions of political authorities.

    There are simply too many unidentifiable factors working on events in our lives for any of us to make accurate predictions of the future. Kierkegaard understood the problem of correlating prior learning and future conduct. “Philosophy is perfectly right,” he declared, “in saying that life must be understood backward. But then one forgets the other clause – that it must be lived forward.” The variabilities that inhere in complexity make both our efforts to understand the past and to predict the future uncertain. A penumbra of ignorance will always enshroud both the historian and the prophet.

    But ignorance and fear are closely entwined and, as Thoreau and others have observed, “nothing is so much to be feared as fear.” There is probably no greater drain on our psychic energies than fear of the unknown. I see this in my students, and advise them, on their first day of classes, to learn to be comfortable with uncertainty; that an awareness of one’s ignorance is a catalyst for learning. As the Austrian economists tell us, we act in order to be better off after acting than if we hadn’t acted at all. So, too, learning occurs only when we are uncomfortable with not knowing something we would like to know.

    But fear can debilitate us, making us susceptible to the importunities of those who promise to alleviate our fears if only we will give the direction of our lives over to them. In this manner are institutions born, with the state demanding the greatest authority over us, and promising release from our uncertainties.

    But the state has no clearer crystal ball into the future than do you or I. To the contrary, it is more accurate to suggest that you and I are less prone to error in the management of our personal affairs, than is the state in trying to direct the lives of hundreds of millions of individuals. In addition to our separate interests, the variables confronting events in your life and mine are less numerous, and more localized, than those with which the state deals in its efforts to collectively control all of humanity. If you or I make an error in judgment, you or I suffer the consequences. When the state errs in its planning, mankind in general may suffer.

    A major lesson that will likely emerge from the study of chaos is that our world is simply too complex to be centrally managed. If we are to live well in an inconstant and unpredictable society, we need all the personal autonomy and spontaneity that we can muster. Perhaps in the same way that our ancestors learned to shift their thinking from a geocentric to a heliocentric model of the universe, our children and grandchildren will discover that human society functions better when it is organized horizontally rather than vertically. In words that have become increasingly familiar to us, “nothing grows from the top down.”
    Achkerov kute.

  • #2
    Re: A World Too Complex To Be Managed

    "A major lesson that will likely emerge from the study of chaos is that our world is simply too complex to be centrally managed...”

    I guess I don't feel too bad now for having spent a large part of the last decade trying to learn, understand, and incorporate decentralized ways of doing things (algorithms). Of course things are great when you can force everyone to be cooperative (in the computer world) but things start to fall apart very quickly when some start to find ways to take advantage of the assumed cooperation. In the case of the world, I guess no such assumptions can be made easily so it then starts to take more of a Game Theoretic flavor on how things should be done.

    But I have to say this one part is extremely well said: "The eagerness of so many people to accept superficial answers to complex problems, is what keeps the political rackets in business."
    Last edited by Sip; 05-11-2006, 12:15 AM.
    this post = teh win.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A World Too Complex To Be Managed

      Decentralization is a tricky word. Some who advocate that simply want to remove government protections in favor of mega-corporate governance, tax breaks for corporations--at the expense of the public--an so on. I am completely against that.

      To me, ‘decentralization’ means grassroots democracy (keeping social safety nets—including adding additional ones--and protections for human rights and environmental protections.
      See: http://www.greenparty.org.uk/issues/11

      "Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly's Wings in Brazil set off a Tornado in Texas?" http://whatis.techtarget.com/definit...759332,00.html

      Wall Street had the worst day this year, today. I am not against wealth, per se. I am against wealth gotten at the expense of others lives and nature in general. How someone becomes wealthy, and what they do with the wealth, matters to me. Some industrial corporations are harming nature and people's lives while avoiding paying taxes. They spend tons of money to avoid paying taxes (E.g., oil companies paid 33 million last year to lobby congress to avoid paying taxes--while making record profits.)

      Originally posted by Anahita last night
      Watch what would happen when the Wall Street Capitalists lose the 'real' lol 'economic system.' They will be happy to have good friends who think further ahead than the next quarter.
      http://forum.armenianclub.com/showth...?t=7061&page=2


      Dow Jones ain't got time for the bums
      They wind up on skid row with holes in their pockets
      They plead with you, buddy can you spare the dime
      But you ain't got the time…

      To do the Wall Street Shuffle
      Let your money hustle
      Bet you'd sell your mother
      You can buy another-- Wall Street Shuffle


      The majority of taxes paid in the US don't help those in need.
      Last edited by Anahita; 05-11-2006, 07:09 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A World Too Complex To Be Managed

        I got ways to make this system fair for all.

        I have an alternative (analagous to the New Deal--but with different feedback loops) that I'll post that a little later.

        See the last few posts on the Global Warming thread


        'Wall Street' will reform--or 'run.' Some companies already 'ran' and are now working on respecting nature and human rights.
        --------------------

        I am reposting this here because it is quite relevant to the topic regarding Chaos and the ‘butterfly effect’:

        When a child touches a harmless snake for the first time, compares leaf shapes, and counts the birds in her aural space while blindfolded, she is learning to read the oldest and largest book of all. THIS BOOK’s content rivals that of all the world's libraries - hard copy and electronic - forever. A large conserved wildland is a Web site containing hundreds of thousands of variously integrated Web sites. I will bet any day on the bioliterate person against the bioculturally deprived, be the arena second-guessing the Nasdaq, walking a beat, or writing ad copy for the iMac. The intelligent Web site will obtain the same value-added from being bioliterate.

        And perhaps being bioliterate just might keep the carbon-based Web site in the game a bit longer as we go about our homogenization of humanity and machine. http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache...s&ct=clnk&cd=1


        How a butterfly's wing can bring down Goliath Chaos theories calculate the vulnerability of megasystems?”

        “When a system becomes extremely complex, a normally survivable event -- say, a lightning strike like the one Canadians initially suspected in Thursday's blackout -- can trigger what scientists call a devastating domino effect. The effect is well-known to physics experts in the fields of complexity theory, chaos theory and the theory of self-organized criticality…
        The mysteries of particle physics are child's play compared with the forecasting of weather, riots, stock market wobbles, fluctuations in animal populations and other so-called nonlinear events.”

        San Francisco Chronicle



        The largest electrical power outage in American history blacked out portions of eight American States, which included New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Michigan, Ohio, and Massachusetts, and the Canadian Province of Ontario, affecting nearly sixty million people.
        The occurrence at around 4.00pm EST on Thursday the 14th of August 2003…

        This major shut down affected practically every entity dependent upon electrical power, trains, planes, and practically every other mode of transportation, automobile manufacturing plants, Metro system subways, traffic lights, water pumping stations, sewage plants, gas stations, even Wall Street. Hospitals, fortunately in most cases have generator back-up systems. ”



        This is from “Irony of Religion” thread
        Last edited by Anahita; 05-11-2006, 07:17 PM.

        Comment

        Working...
        X