Where is your first love...?

[felizitation]

Now, do you understand the third ?

[whitelotus]

yes i did. im not going to bother.

have a nice day frenchie

[felizitation]

Originally posted by whitelotus i know that you bastard.
I never said it was a fault

Did you read the second line, just after the first and before the third ?

[whitelotus]

i know that you bastard.
I never said it was a fault

[felizitation]

Originally posted by whitelotus the reason why we seperated wasnt for lack of love, it was the opposite, there was too much love. And those around us wouldnt let us be together for personal reasons, im not going to get into it. But the lack of love was not the reason.

Take the red pill, come back to life.
Your post is just pathetic, romantism bringing an excuse for something that has never existed.
Not loving someone is not a fault

[whitelotus]

Originally posted by sleuth Thanks guys for your respond...loseyourname and withlotus i have questions for both of you...

what do you think ...

we all separated with our loved once because of fait or love wasnt enough...
i have tend to belive that lack of love is the main reason of separations..
Its just hard to admit ....

the reason why we seperated wasnt for lack of love, it was the opposite, there was too much love. And those around us wouldnt let us be together for personal reasons, im not going to get into it. But the lack of love was not the reason.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by loseyourname Really? You're going to tell me what cavemen and peasants were thinking back in the day? I'm not going on any teachings here. I'm only assuming that men who lived thousands of years were capable of feeling the same emotions that I am. So would you if not for all the pot. Seems reasonable.

I'm being sarcastic pinhead, showing you the stupidity behind Marxism.

[loseyourname]

Really? You're going to tell me what cavemen and peasants were thinking back in the day? I'm not going on any teachings here. I'm only assuming that men who lived thousands of years were capable of feeling the same emotions that I am. So would you if not for all the pot. Seems reasonable.

[Anonymouse]

Originally posted by loseyourname Thank you, Gram Parsons. Love was around well before there was any bourgeousie.

That's just something that you've been taught to believe, the caveman didn't know about it, any more than the peasant farmer in the Middle Ages.

It was nothing but a product of bourgeois imaginations in the romantic periods that filtered out such thoughts.

[loseyourname]

Thank you, Gram Parsons. Love was around well before there was any bourgeousie.