which is better???

[ExtraHye]

Re: which is better???

And bookmakers!

How about librarians?

[Anahita]

Re: which is better???

How about librarians?

I like librarians.

[Anahita]

Re: which is better???

yes,and tom servo can burn with desire to have library instead of boookmakes

I am literally in favor of printed books (that kind of culture can't vanish in a power outage) and public librarians (some of first to challenge violations of constitutional rights) ... go on...

[Sip]

Re: which is better???

Books were cool before interactive media but I just can't imagine having to read something that doesn't have a built-in search function anymore.

[Anahita]

Re: which is better???

Hmm. But, can you 'read' me. I don't have that built-in function.... reverse that 'anymore', I think.

[One-Way]

Re: which is better???

Books were cool before interactive media but I just can't imagine having to read something that doesn't have a built-in search function anymore.

Books are far more interesting than anything else on the internet.

As good as movies.

[Sip]

Re: which is better???

Hmm. But, can you 'read' me. I don't have that built-in function....

Everyone does! There are ways to find things out when dealing with an interactive being

[One-Way]

Re: which is better???

but books are sometimes extremely imaginery,different than movies.moreover books can make extravagat promises to its reader....

That's why books are better.

[One-Way]

Re: which is better???

If you read real history or real stories about any country or any figure,yes Its vert interesting to read books.But If you want action and visual movement,more enjoyable to watch.....I like espionage stories,because these were experienced before between USA and SOVIET UNION.I read such kind of books,before these books,these informations were TOP SECRET.but after some period these informations are revealed in books.this appeals to me very much.I dont know you like such kind of books?are you bookworm?

I don't necessarily agree that movies are better if it's about action. Books let you imagine and picture things in your own way, in your own head. The suspense a book contains is far more better than any suspense a movie could provide. I finished "The Da Vinci Code" is three days because I was glued to it, and no matter how good the movie is, it won't top the book. And in a way, it contains some action.

I suppose I am a bookworm. As a child, I was always reading. ALWAYS. It wasn't until very recently when I got interested in books again. My mom would always say, "Remember how you used to love books?" - and now I'm back at it. Before I finished "The Da Vinci Code", I bought a new book, and before I got far into the new book, I bought another one. So now I'm reading a new book, will be done in about two days, and after that - I already have another book waiting.

[chika]

Re: which is better???

love and romance....
hmmm...lets make a new thread...

is it better to have loved and lost?
or to have never loved at all???

yes very cliche...i know...but i am bored...and i dont care!

i think to have loved and lost.. altough it's very painful to lose!!! but at least it's a beautiful feeling we get to feel and know what love is and how it feels to be in love.
It's a feeling which i think everyone should experiance. thats the life end of the day. we should look forward and think that we are who we are because of our past including that love that we once had but doesn't existe any more.