NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

[KanadaHye]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

Watch the video again... take a look at how the second astronaut is trying to keep it from waving. Remember, there is no air or wind drag in space. The moon doesn't have an atmosphere. Unless it was very heavy fabric, it should have been floating around and settling slowly.

You're wrong.
Watch and learn.

How am I wrong? See how the flag in the vacuum took longer to settle? Now add anti-gravity to that. There are far less forces on the moon so it should take far longer for an object to settle once force has been applied to it. The flag in the moon landing acts Earthly.

[Yedtarts]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6MvcIs4OcQ

[Yedtarts]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

NASA Faked Moon Landing

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

[Siggie]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

Yedtarts, the video you're posting is the same one Phil debunks in my link above.

Andre - Add antigravity to that? First of all it's remove the influence of gravity bc there's no anti-gravity anything, but that's neither here nor there. How do you expect gravity to affect it? It's being help up by a metal rod across the top. You made a case about there not being air. That's what the test addressed. You can't make a case about gravity without saying how you think gravity or the lack of it would have changed what was observed. You say it acts Earthly as if you have any experience with anything that's not Earthly...

[KanadaHye]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

Yedtarts, the video you're posting is the same one Phil debunks in my link above.

Andre - Add antigravity to that? First of all it's remove the influence of gravity bc there's no anti-gravity anything, but that's neither here nor there. How do you expect gravity to affect it? It's being help up by a metal rod across the top. You made a case about there not being air. That's what the test addressed. You can't make a case about gravity without saying how you think gravity or the lack of it would have changed what was observed. You say it acts Earthly as if you have any experience with anything that's not Earthly...

The torque that's being applied to the pole which causes the flag to wave has only a 17% downward opposing force on the moon to the one in that test chamber. Once the flag swings one way, it wouldn't be pulled towards the floor as fast as it would in that chamber. The moon landing video shows the flag dropping pretty quick once it's set into motion. It should look more like it's floating.

[Eddo211]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

The torque that's being applied to the pole which causes the flag to wave has only a 17% downward opposing force on the moon to the one in that test chamber. Once the flag swings one way, it wouldn't be pulled towards the floor as fast as it would in that chamber. The moon landing video shows the flag dropping pretty quick once it's set into motion. It should look more like it's floating.

NASA embedded stiff wires in the American flag so that it wouldn't just hang straight down, and adjusted the wire so that the flag appeared to be waving.

[KanadaHye]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

NASA embedded stiff wires in the American flag so that it wouldn't just hang straight down, and adjusted the wire so that the flag appeared to be waving.

I think you're referring to this video http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17v.1182126.mov


Watch the video below... see how suspicious the second astronaut acts... trying to straighten out the flag before its even put into the ground. Also, how much do you think the astronaut putting in the flag weighs with all that equipment? 300 lbs? So if he was exerting any more than 50 lbs of force trying to put that pole into the ground, he would have started lifting off the ground himself. I don't know about you, but I need to put my entire body weight to jam a steel pole into soil let alone moon rock. If the second astronaut wanted to help, he should have held the first one down, lol.

http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000..._H264_720p.mov

[Yedtarts]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

Forget the flag, what about the lighting angles and the shadows? What about the exact same back ground, in one the lander is there and in the other it’s not there? What about there is no dust on the lander’s foot pads although according to them the send is very powdery? And what about all the foot prints underneath the lander? What about the camera’s crosses stayed behind certain objects? Also there are thousands of questions which ether they don’t give any explanations or they answer sarcastically.

[Eddo211]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

I think you're referring to this video http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17v.1182126.mov


Watch the video below... see how suspicious the second astronaut acts... trying to straighten out the flag before its even put into the ground. Also, how much do you think the astronaut putting in the flag weighs with all that equipment? 300 lbs? So if he was exerting any more than 50 lbs of force trying to put that pole into the ground, he would have started lifting off the ground himself. I don't know about you, but I need to put my entire body weight to jam a steel pole into soil let alone moon rock. If the second astronaut wanted to help, he should have held the first one down, lol.

http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a010000..._H264_720p.mov

You are right about the 50 Lbs of force (Gravity 1/6 of Earth)...........but I have also heard that they grow some really good stuff in Canada.

[KanadaHye]

Re: NASA refurbishes video copies of moon landing

You are right about the 50 Lbs of force (Gravity 1/6 of Earth)...........but I have also heard that they grow some really good stuff in Canada.

They do but during the 60's and 70's, it seems they couldn't keep up with the American demand