Moderators?

[TomServo]

I'm against banning them as well. I'd much rather see them ridiculed.

[CatWoman]

If I recall correctly, the word I used was "moderate" NOT "ban".

[Siamanto]

I'm sorry but am I the only one who notices what's going on in the genocide forum? Do any of you even bother to look? They are posting BS about Armenians. I also find the avatars of "apaydin2148" and "thinktwice" very disrespectful.

If that area doesn't interest you, let the admin know so they can have someone like Crimson or Wino to moderate it.

Shad garevoroutioun bedk tche dal. What amazes me is how some give them the opportunity to have a "debate." How can you try to reason with morally and intellectually inferior individuals?
Their goal is probably to distract and diverge/suck energy. They have done for years and on all Armenian forums.

Personally, I won't trust someone like winoman as a moderator when Armenians and *urks are opposed.

Well, I suppose their avatars can be 'fixed' but I wouldn't want to ban them. It's too much fun seeing desperate little Turks trying to reinforce their dogma.

I agree!

And just the thought of winoman moderating doesn't sit well with me.

I agree. Specially in this case!

I'm against banning them as well. I'd much rather see them ridiculed.

I agree.



Note: I have chosen to auto censor the words "*urk" or "*urkish" because it is commonly perceived as unpleasant and offending, evokes unpleasant emotions and imagery and is pregnant with immoral and evil connotations!

[One-Way]

Catwoman for Mod!