Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Interesting page, learned a lot i didnt know

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    From Vrej Nersessian's "Treasures from the Ark", p19 - 20.

    The Date of Armenia's Conversion to Christianity

    In the past twenty-five years remarkable re-evaluations have been made of the sources concerning the Christianization of Armenia. These advances have been accomplished through an analysis of the sources, as well as through some notable revisions in our understanding of the genealogical and chronological aspects of the history of the Armenian Arshakuni kingdom. The exact year in which the conversion of King Trdat tool: place is not agreed among scholars. Tournebize argued that the most probable date lay between 290 and 295. E. Dulaurier, M. Ormanian, M.-L. Chaumont and Father Poghos Ananian, relying largely on the evidence of Movses Khorenatsi's History, have calculated it to have been in or about 302.[12] Movses had concluded that Trdat had begun his reign in the third year of the emperor Diocletian and that St Gregory the Illuminator had 'sat on the throne of Thaddeus in the seventeenth year of Trdat's reign'.[13] Diocletian's reign began in November 284, so Trdat's year of accession would have been 286 or 287, and his seventeenth 302 or 303. H. Manandyan's reading of the evidence leads to a different date.[14] He placed the return of Trdat to Armenia from Rome in 298 or 299, subsequent to the peace established between Rome and Persia after Galerius's victory. Hence Trdat's seventeenth year fell in 314, which, he concluded, was the date of the king's conversion. Behind this conclusion lies Manandyan's proposition that Trdat could not have adopted the Christian faith before 313. It would have been impossible for Trdat, the protege of the Romans and Diocletian in particular, to have adopted officially the Christian faith in his realm when it was opposed by imperial policy. In a passage preserved in the Greek version of Agat'angeghos, Trdat's reliance on Diocletian in matters of religion is put in these terms:

    From a youthful age raised and educated by you [Diocletianj ... hailing the gods who saved our power together with ourselves, I loathe the so-called Christians. What is more, I gave over to the bitterest death [after] tortures a certain Cappadocian [named] Gregory beloved by me, throwing [him] into a pit in which dwell snakes who devour [those] thrown therein. And now, Lord emperor, I will fulfill thy orders to me with all haste and willingness.[15]

    An external evidence for the dating of Trdat's conversion is provided by St Gregory's consecration in Cappadocia. According to Agat'angeghos's History of the Armenians, Gregory went to Caesarea where a council of bishops had been held on the occasion of his consecration. The date of this council is fixed at 314.[16] This date is consistent with another statement in Agat'angeghos that, on his return from Caesarea, Gregory had brought with him the relics of St Athenogenes. The latter was martyred probably about 303-5, so his relics would have been available in 314. Following this line of the argument, Ananian concluded that the year 314 was also the date of the 'official' conversion of the Armenians.[17] Behind Ananian's conclusion lies Manandyan's proposition that Trdat could not have adopted the Christian faith before 313, as this was the year in which an edict had been promulgated in Milan by the emperors Constantine and Licinius granting freedom of worship to Christians. The non-Armenian evidence for the conversion of Armenia is small, but nevertheless important. Sozomen in his Ecclesiastical History refers to the Armenians:
    the Armenians were the first to embrace Christianity. It is said that Tiridates, the sovereign of that nation, was converted by means of a miracle which was wrought in his own house: and that he issued commands to all the rulers, by a herald, to adopt the same
    religion. Subsequently, the Christian religion became known to the neighbouring tribes, and was very greatly disseminated.[18]

    A second external source is Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History. The author records in relation to Emperor Maximinus Daia, who governed the Roman province of Oriens:

    In addition to this, the tyrant had the further trouble of the war against the Armenians, men who from ancient times had been friends and allies of the Romans; but as they were Christians and exceedingly earnest in their piety towards the Deity, this hater of God, by attempting to compel them to sacrifice to idols and demons, made them foes instead of friends, and enemies instead of allies.[19]

    This war took place in 312. The outcome was that Maximinus Daia 'was worn out along with his commanders in the Armenian war' . The question that now arises is: if Gregory was sent to Caesarea for consecration in 314, when was Trdat's conversion likely to have taken place? Relying on the chronology of the Narratio de rebus Armeniae, compiled in about 700, the Council of Nicaea had been held 'in the thirty-fourth year of Trdat and the twentieth after the deliverance of St Gregory'. The deliverance refers to Gregory's emergence from the dungeon. His release had occurred just before the king's conversion. If the Council of Nicaea was held in June 325, then the release of Gregory and the subsequent conversion of the king took place in 305 or 306. Confirmation of this dating is provided by Patriarch Michael's independent testimony that Gregory's mission took place 'at the beginning of Constantine's reign', i.e. around 306. Furthermore, Trdat's persecution of the Christians now coincides with the Great Persecution that broke out on 23 February 303, led by Diocletian. The flight of the thirty-three Christian nuns to Armenia must have taken place between 304 and 306. It was led by Gayane and Hrip'sime, and they suffered martyrdom at the hands of King Trdat sometime during those years. St John Chrysostom in his panegyric dedicated to St Gregory, written during his exile in Armenia (AD 404-7), refers to the two virgin martyrs. The death of the young women led to the eventual conversion of the king.

    Bibliography

    12. Tournebize, Fr., Histoire politique et religieuse de l'Armenie. Paris, 1910, pp. 428-44; Dulaurier, E., Recherches sur la chronologie armenienne. Paris, 1859, p. 47; Ormanian, M., The Church of Armenia, 2nd edn, London, 1955, p. 8; Chaumont, Marie-Louise, NOTES
    Recherches sur I'histoire d' Armenie. Sassanides conversion du Royaume. Paris, 1969, pp. 156-8; Manaseryan, Ruben, Hayastane Artavazdits mintchev Trdat Meds (Armenia from Artavazd to Trdat the Great). Erevan, 1997, pp. 196-201.
    13. Movses Khorenatsi, History of the Armenians, transl. R.W. Thomson. Cambridge, MA, 1980, II, 82 and 91.
    14. Manandyan, Hakob, K'nnakan tesut'yun hay zhoghovrdi patmut'yan (Critical analysis of Armenian history). Erevan, 1957, vol. 2(1 ), 114-28; Mirichian Ara, 'Samuel Anetsin Rayots K'ristoneut'iwn endunelu t'uali:ani aintchut'eamb' (Samuel Anetsi on the date of the conversion of Armenia to Christianity), Shoghakat (July 1953), 193-6; Fntglian Garnik, Hayots dardzn i I('ristoneut'iwn (The conversion of Armenia to Christianity), pp. 20-21.
    15. Garitte, G., Documents pour I'etude du livre d'Agathange (Studie Testi 127). Vatican City, 1946, pp. 37 and 293.
    16. Lebon, J., 'Sur un concile de Cesaree', Le Museon 51 (1938), 89-132.
    17. Ananian' Poghos, Grigor Lusavortchi jernadrut'ean t'uakane ev paraganere (The date and circumstances of Gregory the Illuminator's consecration). Venice, 1960, p. 172.
    18. Sozomen, The Ecclesiastical History. Bli:. II, 8, transl. by Edward Walford. London, 1855, p. 63.
    19. Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea, The Ecclesiastical History and the Martyrs of Palestine, transl. and introduction by H.J. Lawlor. London, 1927-28, pp. 214, 286; Frend, W.H.C., The Early Church. Philadelphia, 1982, p. 123.
    Plenipotentiary meow!

    Comment


    • #32
      its ironic, cuz regab said that communism would be 'in the dust bin of history'.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by nairi
        Hmm, not sure I should trust Redgate, if only because she fails to mention that Ararat is a sacred mountain for Armenians

        Seriously, she has never even met an Armenian, never been to Armenia or anything like that and yet claims to be objective... That's like me writing my thesis on Apache Indian without ever hearing that language first hand, but only reading other people's accounts. How seriously would you take me?
        Oops, I forgot "he" was actually a "she"

        But all these sort of books are just selections gleamed from other sources, the sort of sources that never get onto the ordinary bookshelves. One does not need specialist knowledge to be objective in such circumstances, one only needs a good reading list!
        Plenipotentiary meow!

        Comment


        • #34
          so what, according to enstein time is relative. armenians accpted christianity is 314. and america rejected it in 1783.

          Comment


          • #35
            Me, writing back in January 2001, on hy(e)forum. I was rather eloquent in those distant days.

            "Long ago and far away, there once was a dynasty of kings called the Arsacids. One branch ruled in what is now Persia, another branch ruled much of Armenia. In the mid 220s the Persian Arsacid dynasty was expelled by a new dynasty, the Sassanids. The Armenian branch supported attempts to re-establish their Persian cousins - and to stop these actions it is believed the Sassanids instigated the murder of the Armenian Arsacid king Khosrov the second (this happened around the year 287). It is thought that he was murdered by his own brother, and religious tradition says that the assassin was captured and executed along with his whole family, except for two boys. One of these boys was taken to the Roman empire (to the city of Caeserea) for safety and he was to be later known as St. Gregory the Illuminator.

            The son of Khosrov, Trdat or Tiridates, also was taken to the Roman empire to save him from his father's fate. The Romans won an important military victory over Persia in the year 297, after which they re-acquired their suzrency over Armenia and placed the pro-Roman Trdat on its throne (who then had to cede part of western Armenian territory to Rome). Trdat was forced to adopt a very pro-Roman policy for Armenia to counteract the constant threat of a Persian campaign against him.

            This is why the 301AD date for Armenia's "conversion" to Christianity is very unlikely. At that time the last serious persecutions of Christians in the Roman Empire was taking place, and it is unlikely that Trdat would not have followed the policies of his Roman ally, with perhaps a short delay to see what way the wind was blowing. This would account for Hripsime's virgins fleeing to Armenia to escape persecution by the Romans - Armenia would be a likely place for Christians to flee to at the start of the Roman persecutions, and there would have been a period of safety before Trdat enforced the persecutions in his own realm.

            The official persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire ended in 311, and shortly afterwards came the emperor Constantine’s conversion to Christianity.

            It is with this background that Trdat suddenly ceased his own persecutions of Christians and embraced the new faith himself. This probably happened in the year 314. He did it for purely political reasons - to ensure a continuing alliance with the now Christian Roman empire and a permanent break with the Zoroastrian Persian empire. The previously established religion in Armenia would have been pro-Persian so it had to be totally dismantled as an organisation. Its lands were given to the new religion, - which actually meant given to the Arsacids since St. Gregory, the head of this new religion, later married into the Arsacid dynasty (and if he was the son of the assassin of Khasrov, and the assassin was the king’s brother, then he already was an Arsacid).

            Most of the population did not immediately become Christian. To start with only the nobility followed the king - and that to start with was probably just political as well. Later both king Trdat and a son of St. Gregory were to be assassinated by pro-Persian / anti-Christian factions in the nobility. The conversion of the ordinary people probably took about 150 years to complete - and for further centuries they still retained many of their old beliefs. I'm not certain, but I presume the Georgian claim for being the first Christian nation comes from their king being converted by St. Nino - who was a survivor from St. Hripsime's party.

            As usual, history is written by the winners - so official church history and traditions should not be automatically seen as a true history of the Armenian church. Be wary also of some history books written by Armenians! While checking some of this I looked at a book called "the Kingdom of Armenia" by M. Chahin. He seems to think that Trdat was the son of Khosrov the first, whom he says died in 252. He actually died in 217, but even if it was 252, he would have been dead before his son was born!

            Later I wrote:

            "Does anyone honestly believe that everyone in Armenia in 301 meekly abandoned their beliefs to adopt the latest fashion just because the king wanted it. It is about as likely as everyone in Armenia becoming ardent communists in 1921! And there were plenty of Christians in Armenia before 301.

            This 1700 anniversary thing may be useful as a hook to hang all sorts of worthwhile cultural events on, but don't confuse it with real history!"

            To which someone (MJ?) replied:

            "I think this skepticism of Bellthecat/Steve highlights one of the biggest myths in Armenian history and consciousness.

            Of course, Trdat was the first King in history to declare Christianity as official state religion (my understanding is that there is no argument about it anywhere). But what does this mean? Is it as simple as Armenians became Christian in 301? To me this type of declaration is absurd. People, especially nations, don't become Christian or Muslim overnight, by the order of the King. Christianity is a lifetime process of self-cleansing and spiritual self-perfection.

            It is known that the Christianity is brought to Armenia by the Apostles Bartholomeous and Thaddeus. In the absence of airplanes, it is obvious that, unless God’s miracle has descended them directly in Armenia (of which there is no evidence), they had to walk/ride through many other countries and nations. Being devoted disciples of Christ, they could’ve not just headed directly to Armenia, but would’ve tried to preach and baptize every one on their way. They had also to maneuver to avoid the persecution of the local authorities on their way. So it should’ve taken a very long time for them to reach Armenia since the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. By that time, with the same success, many communities would’ve become Christian. Don’t forget that meanwhile, the other Apostles and other disciples were doing the same – baptizing anyone they could. So by the time the two “Armenian” Apostles would've reached Armenia, a lot of communities would've already been Christened, and moreover, even slaughtered for their beliefs – so that Armenians are not even the first Christian martyrs."
            Plenipotentiary meow!

            Comment


            • #36
              Bell-the-cat, why are you arguing about our history? 301AD is a fact and everyone knows it. Don't be silly. You're not even Armenian, so I'm sorry but you can't possibly know more about us that we do.

              Comment


              • #37
                Sorry, but you are the one who is being silly. I thought cats were cleverer (oops sorry, you are just dressed as a cat! )

                There are no proper "facts" at all to support 301AD. The numerous evidence that points to the various other dates and not 301AD is proof of that. All dates from such an early and obscure period are uncertain, what should be done is to make a judgement base on the evidence as a whole.
                Plenipotentiary meow!

                Comment


                • #38
                  you are an idiot. no facts? what the hell are you talking about? 301 ad is almost universally accepted as the date by both Armenians and non Armenians and still you jabber on bringing up obscure crap.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Yes, cats are very smart, they just don't care.….hehe

                    Ok now back to the main subject,

                    St. Gregory the son of Anak was the person that taught Armenians about Christianity during King Drtad III. It’s an interesting story actually. Here is a short version of it. The king met Gregory who had already accepted the Christian faith on his way back to Armenia to regain his throne. He took Gregory into his service, later finding out about his Christian faith and sending Gregory to be imprisoned in Khor virab (deep pit) because of some jealousy issues. (you can actually visit khor virab in Armenia known as the place where St Gregory stayed for I believe 7years, it’s a freaky and DARK place!) Later the king gets ill (mental disorder) and his sister had a dream where she was told that only Gregory could save him, the King agreed to release Gregory. Gregory restored the king’s health and sanity, and then baptized him with all his household. Thus, the King, in 301 A.D., proclaimed Christianity the sole state religion, making Armenia the first Christian nation.

                    Now, there are books on this that you can actually read if interested, but it’s history. There is no way to go back and double check so we just have to take the words of historians and we do (well I don’t know about you, but most people do) and honestly, I don’t think they would have benefited in any way from making this up so many years ago!!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      bell-the-cat, first you say that you don't believe in the Armenian sources, then you quote one, which makes your statement very hypocritical. Second you are basing the events on the Latin calender, I am pretty sure that the Armenians used the Armenian calander. Thirdly, and again, since the Catholic Church states that the war took place at 311 against the Church of Armenia (meaning the national church), I am going to take the Catholic Churches statement against an INDIVIDUAL conclusion. BTW, I provided you with a non-Armenian source regarding the conversion date and you still refuse to accept it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X