Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

“Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

    Don't forget the Food Network! I don't think that there are homosexuals there since it's all about the food.
    Achkerov kute.

    Comment


    • #42
      Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

      Originally posted by karoaper
      yep, there's a heavy idiocy-agenda on TV that's for sure, starting from pop culture channels, (E, MTV, etc) and ending with 'so-called' news channels that breed a nation of brain dead blind empathisers and head-nodders. Only decent channels are pbs and playboy.

      I don't watch TV much, I dont have the time for it, and if I have time, I watch a movie or something, thanks to cable

      Oh the other channel I watch is Fashion TV

      Comment


      • #43
        Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

        Originally posted by Anonymouse
        The study I was referring to was published in The American Sociological Review in April of 2001 I believe, titled "Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?" by USC professors Judith Stacey and Timothy J. Biblarz.
        Reference:
        "Do Parents Influence the Sexual Orientation of Their Children? Findings from a Longitudinal Study of Lesbian Families" by Susan Golombok, Ph.D., and Fiona Tasker, Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology, Vol.32, No. 1, pp 3-11.

        SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF PARENTS FOUND NOT TO INFLUENCE
        SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF CHILDREN
        First Study to Follow from Childhood to Adulthood Young People Raised in Lesbian Families

        WASHINGTON -- The commonly held assumption that children brought up by lesbian mothers will themselves grow up to be gay or lesbian does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. That is the conclusion of a new study appearing in the January [1999 I think] issue of Developmental Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA).

        The authors, psychologists Susan Golombok, Ph.D., and Fiona Tasker, Ph.D., of City University, London, England, note that previously existing research on the relation between parental behavior and children's sexual orientation "failed to produce empirical evidence to demonstrate that parents' behavior influences the development of their children's sexual orientation." In addition, all previous studies had involved heterosexual families.

        Their study followed 27 lesbian mothers and their 39 children and a control group of group of 27 heterosexual single mothers and their 39 children from the time the children were around age 10 (1976-77) to when they were around age 24 (1992-93). Sixty-two percent of the original sample of children took part in the follow- up study. There was no significant difference between adults raised in lesbian families and their peers from single-mother heterosexual households in the proportion who reported sexual attraction to someone of the same gender.

        Rest at:
        Last edited by Anahita; 07-10-2006, 05:32 PM.

        Comment


        • #44
          Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

          The thing about gay parades or homosexuality in your face is that just like a spring-action, it is a reaction to the years of closet accomodations and fear and shame of self. You abuse anyone or a group of anyones enough, and you'll have an accelerated and even somewhat frantic and forced resurgance and revival of said group. We saw it with race as well when marches, special interest groups and so forth sprang out for "struggle" of colored peoples. I don't know if this phenomenon is permanent, but I highly doubt it.
          Last edited by karoaper; 07-10-2006, 05:44 PM.

          Comment


          • #45
            Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

            Originally posted by Anahita
            Reference:
            "Do Parents Influence the Sexual Orientation of Their Children? Findings from a Longitudinal Study of Lesbian Families" by Susan Golombok, Ph.D., and Fiona Tasker, Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology, Vol.32, No. 1, pp 3-11.

            SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF PARENTS FOUND NOT TO INFLUENCE
            SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF CHILDREN
            First Study to Follow from Childhood to Adulthood Young People Raised in Lesbian Families

            WASHINGTON -- The commonly held assumption that children brought up by lesbian mothers will themselves grow up to be gay or lesbian does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. That is the conclusion of a new study appearing in the January [1999 I think] issue of Developmental Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA).

            The authors, psychologists Susan Golombok, Ph.D., and Fiona Tasker, Ph.D., of City University, London, England, note that previously existing research on the relation between parental behavior and children's sexual orientation "failed to produce empirical evidence to demonstrate that parents' behavior influences the development of their children's sexual orientation." In addition, all previous studies had involved heterosexual families.

            Their study followed 27 lesbian mothers and their 39 children and a control group of group of 27 heterosexual single mothers and their 39 children from the time the children were around age 10 (1976-77) to when they were around age 24 (1992-93). Sixty-two percent of the original sample of children took part in the follow- up study. There was no significant difference between adults raised in lesbian families and their peers from single-mother heterosexual households in the proportion who reported sexual attraction to someone of the same gender.

            Rest at:
            http://www.selfhelpmagazine.com/arti.../orientat.html
            So why are you cherry picking things to satisfy your argument. Why not quote the part that is damning to your argument?

            "Significantly more of the young adults from lesbian family backgrounds stated that they had previously considered, or thought it a future possibility, that they might experience same-gender attraction or have a same- gender sexual relationship or both."

            I also like this following line of admission:

            "Daughters of lesbian mothers were significantly more likely to consider that idea than the daughters of heterosexual mothers"

            But then they go on to somehow downplay the results with this sentence.

            "...but there was no significant difference between sons from the two family types on that issue.

            All things considered, what matters is how the thoughts of homosexuality were actually inserted into the minds of these children, saying that they were more like to consider it, which again goes to the truth of the matter here. In modernity, homosexuals are no longer born, they are produced.
            Achkerov kute.

            Comment


            • #46
              Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

              Originally posted by Anonymouse
              So why are you cherry picking things to satisfy your argument. Why not quote the part that is damning to your argument?
              I had that there, but edited it to see who would read the rest. How is that at all damning to my argument?

              "Daughters of lesbian mothers were significantly more likely to consider that idea than the daughters of heterosexual mothers"
              More likely to be open-minded and/or admit that. Modern times are no different. It is just that people are more open now to talking about sexuality. I think that is GOOD.

              Comment


              • #47
                Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

                Originally posted by Anahita
                I had that there, but edited it to see who would read the rest. How is that at all damning to my argument?
                Yet more things that counter what you claimed by cherry picking things to favor your case.

                Take, for example, the question of the children’s sexual orientation. Whereas the original studies found that lesbian parents do not produce a higher percentage of gay or lesbian children than heterosexual parents, the reality, as Stacey and Biblarz point out, is more complicated. In one of the original studies, 25 percent of adults raised by lesbians (6 of 25) reported having a homoerotic relationship, as compared to none of those (out of 20 surveyed) with heterosexual parents. In another study, 64 percent of the adults with lesbian parents (14 of 22) reported that they would consider having a same-sex relationship, as opposed to 17 percent of those with heterosexual parents (3 of 18).


                Originally posted by Anahita
                More likely to be open-minded and/or admit that. Modern times are no different. It is just that people are more open now to talking about sexuality. I think that is GOOD.
                Please do not divert the argument by pontificating how society was back then vs how society is now, as that is a scope of conjecture. Deal with what is at hand, and at hand, the study which I cited, and which you tried to use as a counter claim to mine, actually supports what we have said all along, children who are raised by homosexual parents are more likely to be homosexuals.
                Achkerov kute.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

                  What is 'my argument?'

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

                    Here is an interesting article with a similar study claiming that homosexual parenting does not in any way impact the sexual orientation of the children reared.

                    Do parents influence the sexual preference of children?

                    Warren Throckmorton, PhD
                    February 19, 2004

                    Gay parenting is at least a cousin to the contentious and current issue of gay marriage. Numerous professional organizations have expressed a common theme: The sexual orientation of parents makes no difference in the sexual orientation of children nor does the orientation of parents have any impact on any indicators of child welfare. For instance the technical report of the American Academy of Pediatrics supporting gay couple adoption reads: “No differences have been found in the…sexual orientation of adults who had a divorced homosexual parent (or parents), compared with those who had divorced heterosexual parents.”

                    Examining the research on this question, I have recently reread a study germane to the relationship between gay parents and the sexual preferences of children. While the study is somewhat dated, the results are still worth reviewing due to their relevance to current questions being debated in the culture.

                    The research by Susan Golombok and Fiona Tasker was reported in a 1996 issue of Developmental Psychology. These authors studied 25 children of lesbian single mothers and 21 children of straight single mothers beginning when the children were in elementary school and then again in young adulthood. Specifically, the authors were wondering if being raised by lesbian mothers would increase the likelihood of children identifying as lesbian. This study has been widely quoted to prove that children raised by gay parents are not more likely to become gay themselves. The authors acknowledge their results demonstrate that young adults are more likely to consider trying out and actually engaging in homosexual relationships. However, they say their analysis of the results do not support the idea that the actual sexual orientation of children is significantly different based on having a lesbian mother.

                    In looking again, I come to a somewhat different understanding of the findings. The authors reported the sexual orientation of the children studied in two different ways. They reported the number of children who labeled themselves bisexual or lesbian and then they reported the Kinsey rating of the participants. These ratings were assigned by the researchers. Kinsey ratings range from 0 to 6 with 0 being exclusively heterosexual and 6 being exclusively homosexual. Generally, ratings of 2 through 4 are considered descriptive of bisexuality. When documenting the self-labels of the participants, they reported two out of 25 children raised by lesbian mothers to be bisexual or gay. None of the children raised by straight single mothers self-identified as gay or bisexual. Statistically, this difference is unrelated to the sexual orientation of the mother.

                    However, when the Kinsey ratings are examined, there are four participants with Kinsey ratings of 2 or higher, thus indicating at least bisexual levels of same sex attraction. There is no explanation in the article for this discrepancy in the report. This suggests the need for a re-examination of the differences between groups. If one asks the question: “Does having a lesbian mother make one more likely to experience same sex attraction?” then one may reanalyze the Kinsey ratings to answer that question. Indeed, there is a statistically significant difference between the two groups when one compares ratings of same sex attraction.

                    What does this mean? Of course, one always wants more research to answer any question of this sort, but the data from this study suggests that having a lesbian mother does relate to a greater likelihood of children experiencing same sex attraction themselves. Thus, the same study often used to say sexual preferences aren’t impacted by parenting actually points to the opposite conclusion.

                    Is this finding a bad thing? I suppose that is a matter of perspective. Whether policy concerning gay parenting would be changed by a re-examination of the relationship between parenting and sexual orientation is a matter of how one values the potential increase in same sex or bisexual orientation in the culture. However one feels about the matter, it seems that the conventional wisdom concerning the relationship between gay parents and the sexual preferences of children should be revisited.
                    Achkerov kute.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Re: “Love and Loyalty”: Marriage in secret, in an environment of fear

                      Originally posted by Anahita
                      What is 'my argument?'
                      That homosexual parenting does not impact children.
                      Achkerov kute.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X