Originally posted by Mos
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Armenia and the information war
Collapse
X
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
Originally posted by Mos View PostA dictatorship addicted to oil - their future is pretty grim.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
Originally posted by Federate View PostThe perception is that the grass is always greener on the neighbour's side. Armenians think Georgians live better off and Georgians think Armenians live better off. It's amusing.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
The perception is that the grass is always greener on the neighbour's side. Armenians think Georgians live better off and Georgians think Armenians live better off. It's amusing.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
The most important thing is that we never compromise on our independence. The independence of the Armenian nation in the last 20 years is one of the biggest achievements of the Armenian race and we have to fight in order to keep Armenia independent and free. That is why, while we can have good relations with EU (which we should), I would never want Armenia to be a member of the EU or any other such union as it compromises our independence. Our security concerns are naturally tied to the Turks. We have to make sure to always be on the side that is against Turks and we should never forget that the destruction of Armenia is in the forefront for both Turkey and Azerbaijan. Having Russia as an ally has possibly saved us from much turmoil and destruction.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
Originally posted by Mher View PostGuys I have some serious questions. Now some of my questions might be because I am young and/or I do not have enough knowledge of the geopolitics of Armenia, but it seems difficult for me to understand how you guys attack Bell for stating things that seem common knowledge and common sense to everyone I have ever spoken to. So please, explain your point of view, and let me know what, if anything, I am missing here.
You say that Putin is a strong leader, that the corruption in Russia is because of capitalism, that is comes with capitalism. That however seems insane to me, considering its not that it simply comes with capitalism. Capitalism works fine everywhere else in the world, and corruption is not nearly to the level that it is in Russia and in Armenia. Yes corruption still exists, but to reasonable extends. The free market system is a proven superior system of economics that was promoted by Adam Smith as a means to fight monopolies and oligarchies. Furthermore, it is not like Putin is out there fighting corruption, making it a central part of his policy. If anything, he is fine with it and allows it to flourish. According to Transparency International, Russia is ranked 154th in the world in terms of Corruption. This ranking got worse under Putin. You say that he is a strong leader. However, does that include ending democracy or taking away basic rights. Does being a strong leader, being a "true leader: include denying people basic rights, by controlling the media, by allowing little opposition?
You guys says that he is going to lead Russia to prosperity, that Russia is on the rise. However, the data says otherwise. The population of Russia is expended to dwindle down to 100 million by 2050, the average life expectancy for a male right now is merely 62. These are not facts that show any optimism for the future.
There is often criticism on this forum of Georgia, and their western system. But the fact is that corruption in Georgia is much less significant than in Armenia. In recent years, in Georgia the the business environment has steadily improved, and corruption has steadily decreased, while things have moved in the opposite direction for Armenia who is following the Russian system.
So this leads me to wonder how am I wrong here? What am I missing?
How is Bell being a "hater" or anti-armenian by stating things that are simply facts
Yes Armenia needs Russian military support right now, but that doesnt mean it should simply roll over for Russia and allow the same corrupt and doomed system to take over Armenia. Just because they are good to Armenia right now, doesnt mean we have to accept and respect everything about Russia or its leadership. Just because they help us right now, does not mean that in 5 years they would not stab Armenia in the back if it proves strategically worthwhile to them.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
All (most) of us here are products of the west, brainwashed through the news/propaganda.
To overcome this mind-set we need to think “outside the box”.
A question to ponder:
Why would the west want to determine/criticize the type of leader in another country which is competitor nation as far as geopolitics goes.
Do they really wand a stronger and healthier society as a competitor?
No different than attempting to decide the players to your opposing team.
The propaganda machine does it so skilfully to make it seem almost a logical expression.
In this joke is the West trying to be the Irishman?
During the time of the French Revolution an Englishman, a Welshman
and an Irishman were captured and taken to the guillotine.
The first man taken up was the Englishman. He was asked
whether he wanted to lie face up or face down. He chose face up. The
guillotine dropped but stopped short. The rules were that if a man
wasn’t beheaded at the first attempt, he was allowed to go free. So
the Englishman went free.
Next up was the Welshman. He also chose to lie face up, and the same
thing happened – the guillotine stopped short and so he was allowed to walk free.
Finally came the Irishman. He also chose to lie face up. “Ah ha,” he said. “I see what the problem is.”
.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Armenia and the information war
Guys I have some serious questions. Now some of my questions might be because I am young and/or I do not have enough knowledge of the geopolitics of Armenia, but it seems difficult for me to understand how you guys attack Bell for stating things that seem common knowledge and common sense to everyone I have ever spoken to. So please, explain your point of view, and let me know what, if anything, I am missing here.
You say that Putin is a strong leader, that the corruption in Russia is because of capitalism, that is comes with capitalism. That however seems insane to me, considering its not that it simply comes with capitalism. Capitalism works fine everywhere else in the world, and corruption is not nearly to the level that it is in Russia and in Armenia. Yes corruption still exists, but to reasonable extends. The free market system is a proven superior system of economics that was promoted by Adam Smith as a means to fight monopolies and oligarchies. Furthermore, it is not like Putin is out there fighting corruption, making it a central part of his policy. If anything, he is fine with it and allows it to flourish. According to Transparency International, Russia is ranked 154th in the world in terms of Corruption. This ranking got worse under Putin. You say that he is a strong leader. However, does that include ending democracy or taking away basic rights. Does being a strong leader, being a "true leader: include denying people basic rights, by controlling the media, by allowing little opposition?
You guys says that he is going to lead Russia to prosperity, that Russia is on the rise. However, the data says otherwise. The population of Russia is expended to dwindle down to 100 million by 2050, the average life expectancy for a male right now is merely 62. These are not facts that show any optimism for the future.
There is often criticism on this forum of Georgia, and their western system. But the fact is that corruption in Georgia is much less significant than in Armenia. In recent years, in Georgia the the business environment has steadily improved, and corruption has steadily decreased, while things have moved in the opposite direction for Armenia who is following the Russian system.
So this leads me to wonder how am I wrong here? What am I missing?
How is Bell being a "hater" or anti-armenian by stating things that are simply facts
Yes Armenia needs Russian military support right now, but that doesnt mean it should simply roll over for Russia and allow the same corrupt and doomed system to take over Armenia. Just because they are good to Armenia right now, doesnt mean we have to accept and respect everything about Russia or its leadership. Just because they help us right now, does not mean that in 5 years they would not stab Armenia in the back if it proves strategically worthwhile to them.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: