Re: Nagorno-Karabagh: Military Balance Between Armenia & Azerbaijan
	
		
			
			
				
	
They have similar range but operate completely differently.
The SA-8 is radar guided. The Spyder is Infra-red guided. Both guidance systems have advantages and disadvantages.
The Spyder's guidance is similar to the SA-9 and SA-13.
The Spyder was supplied to Georgia and was used in the 08.08.2008 Russia-Georgia conflict without any documented success.
There are no indications (so far) that the system was supplied to Azerbaijan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Youtube clips you posted about our Su-25s are great.
The Su-25 is the ideal strike aircraft for our needs. It is inexpensive to operate/maintain and it is very very rugged. It's engines are not fussy about the quality of fuel. It's vital parts (engines and c-o-c-k-pit) are armour plated to survive direct anti-aircraft hits. It is easy to fly and service.
Our airmen need all the training they can get to use it. In case of war, they will be used to assist our troops on the frontline as well attack key Azeri positions in the rear (supply lines, headqaurters, assembly points etc etc.).
The low flying and strike techniques (in the video) will be the method of choice in order to evade Azeri detection as much as possible.
					
					Originally posted by ArmeniaR
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		The SA-8 is radar guided. The Spyder is Infra-red guided. Both guidance systems have advantages and disadvantages.
The Spyder's guidance is similar to the SA-9 and SA-13.
The Spyder was supplied to Georgia and was used in the 08.08.2008 Russia-Georgia conflict without any documented success.
There are no indications (so far) that the system was supplied to Azerbaijan.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Youtube clips you posted about our Su-25s are great.
The Su-25 is the ideal strike aircraft for our needs. It is inexpensive to operate/maintain and it is very very rugged. It's engines are not fussy about the quality of fuel. It's vital parts (engines and c-o-c-k-pit) are armour plated to survive direct anti-aircraft hits. It is easy to fly and service.
Our airmen need all the training they can get to use it. In case of war, they will be used to assist our troops on the frontline as well attack key Azeri positions in the rear (supply lines, headqaurters, assembly points etc etc.).
The low flying and strike techniques (in the video) will be the method of choice in order to evade Azeri detection as much as possible.







Comment