The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

[Armenian]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Armenian, to keep it short. When encouraging the presence of Western interest, I was only wishing it to be part of Azerbaijan's policy and not that of Armenia.

Azad, like I outlined in my previous post; I believe the Caucasus could do without western meddling. As long as you have foreign influences in the region (American, European, Turkish) the region will never see peace. Note that Russia is 'not' a foreign influence in the region. When Russia has been 'healthy' Russia has historically been a pacifier in the region. If you want Armenia to prosper and move forward, then wish for peace in the Caucasus.

There is a reason why few days ago Iran switched camp on the Artsakh issue and Russia is trying to nail the last nail on the Western coffin in the Caucasus. You know very well the azeris are going to whine and precondition their newly friends the Artsakh issue. What do we have to offer in return now? since we are not exclusive.

Iran switching sides? Sounds like disinformation. Where are you getting this information from? Would you be referring to the following interview? If so, I wouldn't make too much of it. It's simply the opinion on a single political analyst.

Kosovo phantom hovering over Caucasus

The South Caucasus states have always been in focus of Russian politicians. However, position of official Moscow on the unsettled conflicts in Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia sometimes arouses astonishment, specifically in Armenia. The “outpost” stereotype yields to pragmatism. Head of the interethnic relations department at the institute of political and military analysis Sergei Markedonov comments to PanARMENIAN.Net on regional developments.

What’s Russia’s real stand on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict?

Russia’s role is weakening. Unlike the United States, Moscow doesn’t render financial assistance to NKR. Satisfied with contacts with Armenia, Russia doesn’t demonstrate any intention to engage Nagorno Karabakh as a full-fledged participant in the talks. After proclamation of Kosovo’s independence and its recognition by a number of states, Russia outlined its stand on Abkhazia and Ossetia but prefers to avoid Nagorno Karabakh. Meanwhile, strategy should never be restricted to recognition or silence. There are lots of approaches. I should also mention that the position of official Yerevan and unrecognized Stepanakert do not always coincide. Undoubtedly, Russia needs sustainable relations with Azerbaijan. But recognition of NKR as a party in talks is recognition of political reality but not recognition of de facto state.

Despite international community’s statements on inadmissibility of Karabakh conflict resolution by use of force, Baku doesn’t give up its warlike rhetoric and anti-Armenian hysteria…

Official Baku’s conduct should be viewed from various angles. First, it’s the forthcoming presidential election. Second, Azerbaijan is trying to insinuate itself into the international community not only as an energy supplier but also as a dynamically developing state. Be attentive to notice that oil is not mentioned in ads about Azerbaijan. As to bellicose statements, they won’t stop. The Kosovo phantom is hovering over Caucasus. Recognition of the breakaway province’s independence was a part of realpolitik and there is no guarantee that Karabakh will not have the same fate. So, Azerbaijan’s concerns are grounded.

There is an impression that Russia doesn’t have any exact program in Caucasus. Is it really so?

Russia has failed to develop a common and distinct policy in Caucasus so far. It’s always late to react to processes in the South and North Caucasus. Relations with Georgia can serve as a vivid example. Russia is interested in ‘frozen conflicts’. However, conflicts are not frozen but lingering. These two notions are different. Russia supports territorial integrity but it stands against the methods this principle is being pushed forth. As for relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan, I can say that Armenia is Russia’s strategic ally while Azerbaijan is a strategic partner. With its military and economic parameters, Russia is closer to Armenia but in case of resumption of military operations our country will face a hard choice. Unfortunately, the Kosovo precedent can provoke hostilities in Karabakh.

How can you comment on Azerbaijan-Iran relations?

There is some progress, what was almost impossible under Heydar Aliyev’s rule. Iran has recently changed its position on Karabakh in Baku’s favor and relations between the countries grew warmer. They have a number of common problems: the Caspian Sea, Southern Azerbaijan. Although, politicians know that unification of Southern and Northern Azerbaijan is unreal.

The Armenian-Turkish relations leave much to be desired. Do you think normalization of relations is possible?

In early 1990-ies Armenia was ready to normalize relations. However, the process was uncoordinated. When the Karabakh war broke out Turkey closed the border with Armenia, thus nullifying all possibilities of reconciliation. Fearing that Armenian forces can enter Nakhijevan, Ankara has taken up the policy of late President Turgut Ozal, who said that Turkey is responsible for the Ottoman heritage. True, there are politicians in Turkey who wish to normalize relations with Armenia but the strong Azeri lobby hampers the process. I should also mention that the key problem is Nagorno Karabakh but not recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

Source: http://www.panarmenian.net/interviews/eng/?nid=106

[North Pole]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Why would this be a catastrophe for Armenia? This is nothing new. Russia already has very lucrative relations with Azerbaijan. As a matter of fact, despite Turkey's direct involvement in the Chechen insurgency, even Russian-Turkish bilateral trade have been very profitable for both nations. Economy is one thing geopolitics is another. Moscow and Baku cooperate in the energy sector, politics, trade, etc. In reality, ever since the Alievs took power Baku has been very compliant to demands by Moscow. Therefore, if Russia was to abandon its strategic relations/alliance with the Armenian Republic it could/would have done so many-many years ago. However, what strategic value would that have had for Moscow? How would abandoning Armenia's alliance serve Russian interests? If Moscow today is getting what it wants from Baku its only because Moscow holds the region's geopolitical/geoeconomic cards. It also holds the Karabagh card. Azerbaijan hold no real weight over Moscow. Azerbaijan is essentially a hostage to the Russian Federation. Baku knows that the Kremlin can essentially ruin Azerbaijan if it chose the path of belligerence. So, why would Moscow change what its been doing so successfully in the region? Why change the status quo?

When the milk is free, why buy the cow?

Armenian, you are very clever and wise man.

[North Pole]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Russia to build up naval presence in world's oceans in 2008

Russia's Northern Fleet will dispatch ships and submarines on tours of duty to various regions of the world's oceans in 2008, the fleet's commander said on Tuesday. "There will be tours of duty this year, involving surface ships, submarines and aircraft," Vice-Admiral Nikolai Maksimov said. Source: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080520/107892020.html

SOME RELATED NEWS:

June 4, 2008

Russian navy ready to use force against Somali pirates

VIDEO - http://russiatoday.ru/news/news/25737/video
READ MORE - http://russiatoday.ru/news/news/25737

Russian Navy resumes constant presence in world's oceans

05/ 12/ 2007
"There are plans to dispatch ships to the northeast Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea from now to February 3, 2008. The expedition is aimed at ensuring a naval presence and establishing conditions for secure Russian navigation," Serdyukov told Vladimir Putin.

READ MORE - http://en.rian.ru/russia/20071205/91056421.html




YouTube Video - "Admiral Kuznetsov" Aircraft Carrier

[Armenian]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Russia warns Ukraine over Nato bid

Ukraine's president called any potential revision to the friendship agreement 'a big mistake' [AFP] Russia's parliament has recommended that the government consider pulling out of a friendship treaty with Ukraine if Kiev takes further steps to joining Nato. The Duma's resolution is not binding, but is likely to add pressure on Ukraine days before Viktor Yushchenko, its pro-Western leader, meets Dmitry Medvedev, Russia's new president. Moscow is strongly opposed to Ukraine joining Nato, saying that it would threaten Russian security and jeopardise an arrangement under which Russia leases Ukraine's Black Sea port of Sevastopol as a navy base. Yushchenko called any potential revision to the friendship agreement "a big mistake".

'Radical steps'

In April, the military alliance decided not to offer Ukraine and Georgia a membership action plan, a path to joining Nato, but agreed to review the situation in December. During a visit to Slovenia on Wednesday, the Ukrainian president said: "We decided to take the road of approaching Europe and Nato, this is our strategic goal, our foreign policy, it is not a policy against some third country, against any neighbour. "From a political point of view, it would be a big mistake if [Russia] now prepared a kind of revision of that treaty. "I will not allow any possibility of raising the voice or provocations [against Russia]. I will do nothing that could throw a wrong light on Ukraine or worsen our relations. The president said Ukraine and Russia currently had friendly relations set "at a high level." Earlier, Yulia Tymoshenko, Ukraine's prime minister, said "radical steps" would only serve to disrupt relations between the neighbouring countries. The Duma, Russia's lower house of parliament, voted by 408-5 to adopt the resolution. The Kremlin often uses the chamber to issue tough resolutions on disputes with its neighbours, a ploy analysts say is designed to strengthen the government's negotiating position.

Sevastopol issue

Scrapping the treaty could, in theory, open the way for Russia to mount a legal challenge to Ukraine's sovereignty over Sevastopol. The treaty recognises the port as within Ukraine's borders and Kiev says it is part of its territory. However, Russian legal experts say without this document, the legal grounds for its status as part of Ukraine are weak. The Crimean peninsula, which includes Sevastopol, was part of the Russian republic of the Soviet Union until 1954, when Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet leader, signed it over to the Ukrainian republic. Some in Russia say Khrushchev's decision was illegal. Yushchenko is due to meet Medvedev later this week at an informal summit of ex-Soviet states. The talks will be their first since Medvedev took over as president from Vladimir Putin last month.

Source: http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exer...3214A498F9.htm

MPs call on Ukraine to choose between Russia and NATO

Russia’s Lower House of Parliament says Moscow should cancel its friendship treaty with Ukraine if the country joins the membership plan for NATO. The two countries signed a treaty eleven years ago to provide security and boost business. The MPs say they want to bring attention to what they see as Ukraine's unfriendly policy. Russian State Duma deputies have expressed concern on the rights of Russians living in Ukraine. The Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet is based in the Ukrainian port city of Sevastopol. But the Ukrainian Parliament says the move is an emotional over-reaction to unbalanced statements by some Ukrainian politicians.

Source: http://www.russiatoday.ru/news/news/25741

[Armenian]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Step-by-step Moscow is setting up its infrastructure within the southern Caucasus. The announced repair of the region's main railroad has great strategic significance (economically and militarily) not only for the Russian Federation and Abkhazia but also for the Armenian Republic. This action by Moscow is a severe counter-blow to the western funded railroad project in the south Caucasus which seeks to connect Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan, bypassing Russia and Armenia.

Armenian

****************************************

Railroad Landing

Russia deployed its railroad construction troops in Abkhazia. Moscow referred to the necessity to repair a railroad that’ll link the breakaway republic to Russia and its Olympic facilities of Sochi. In its turn, Tbilisi regards Russia’s maneuvers as “plotting a military invasion.” The USA immediately sided with Georgia. Nonetheless, according to the information of Kommersant, the deployment of Russia’s units in Abkhazia may be a part of Moscow’s preparation for a meeting of Presidents Dmitry Medvedev and Mikhail Saakashvili planned for this week.

Road to war

“With the pretext of restoring a trunk-railway in Abkhazia, Russia conceals its preparation for a large-scale military operation aiming at annexation and occupation of Georgia,” stated Deputy Defense Minister of Georgia Batu Kutelia. “We consider the activity of Russia as another act of aggression directed against the territorial integrity of Georgia. No doubt, the Russian party is consolidating the military infrastructure to start a military intervention,” Deputy Foreign Minister of Georgia Grigol Vashadze echoed Mr Kutelia. “No one deploys railroad construction troops on the territory of another state unless a military intervention is plotted.” Mr Vashadze reported that due to the recent activity of Russia a 59th note of protest will be handed over to Russia’s ambassador to Georgia Vyacheslav Kovalenko. “In spite of the fact that it’s hard to find the Russian ambassador on occasions like this, we’ll find him, bring to the MFA and hand over the note,” Mr Vashadze added with irritation.

It is Russia’s deployment of its railroad construction troops in Abkhazia, which Russia’s Defense Minister announced Saturday, that aroused the indignation of the Georgian government. “According to the order of the President of the Russian Federation on rendering assistance to the republic of Abkhazia, work on restoring railroad lines and infrastructure has been started, where unarmed units and machines of the Railroad Construction Troops of the Russian Federation are engaged,” reported the Ministry’s Press-Service. In other words, the military justified their activity with the orders that Vladimir Putin gave to the government in April. By the way, Thursday Commander-in-Chief of the Railroad Construction Troops of the Russian Federation Lieutenant General Sergey Klimets stated that his subordinates are ready to provide aid to Abkhazia “in case a corresponding political decision is made.” It means that the decision to send Russian troops to Abkhazia was taken at the top level.

Yesterday Foreign Office Chief of the breakaway republic Sergey Shamba told Kommersant that some 400 Russian military were deployed in Abkhazia. However, Saturday Batu Kutelia stated that, apart from the railroad construction soldiers, 500 Russian commandos landed in Abkhazia. Curiously, on that day Russia’s Defense Ministry reported that a routine rotation of its peace-keepers was carried out in Abkhazia from May 25 to May 30, with “the total number of those replaced amounting to 500 people,” which equals to the figure given by the Georgian Defense Ministry’s experts. Tbilisi has already promised to rebuff “the Russian railroad landing.” “If Russia keeps on with that sort of activity, we’ll respond harshly to it,” Batu Kutelia threatened and promised that the international community will side with Georgia. A few hours later State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack said, “The United States is dismayed by Russia’s Defense Ministry announcement on May 31 that it intends to send more military forces into the Georgian region of Abkhazia without the consent of the Georgian Government. We have expressed our concerns to the Russian government and are in touch with the Georgian government about this latest announcement of a Russian military buildup,” emphasized the American diplomat.

Road to the South Caucasus

For all that, the restoration of the railroad on the territory of Abkhazia will allow Russia to gain much more than just a cheap transportation route for shipping Abkhazian gravel and sand to Sochi. Moscow has been repeatedly trying to repair the railroad linking it with Georgia via Abkhazia: It will enable Moscow to have a direct railroad communication with its key ally in the South Caucasus – Armenia. As far back as March, 2003 Moscow made its first attempt to do it – the question of restoring the railroad became one of the key points during the talks of Vladimir Putin and Georgia’s president Eduard Shevardnadze in Sochi. That time Russia and Georgia negotiated a bargain: Tbilisi provided for a smooth transit between Russia and Armenia, and Moscow promised to thrash out with Sukhumi the matter of Georgian refugees’ returning to Abkhazia. These negotiations didn’t stop even after the Rose Revolution broke out, and May, 2006 the authorities of Russia, Georgia, Armenia and Abkhazia even set up a consortium to restore the railroad. But the escalation of tensions between Moscow and Tbilisi in the autumn of 2006 prevented the plan from being realized.

[...]

Source: http://www.kommersant.com/p898706/r_...ian_railroads/

RUSSIA AND IRAN MAY RESTORE RAIL CORRIDOR THROUGH ARMENIA

Russia and Iran are restoring their direct rail connection via Armenia through projects that would enable bypassing two fragments of the former USSR-Iran corridor now blocked due to ethnic conflict. One is the already functioning Port Kavkaz-Poti ferry link, and the second is a combination of several planned projects in southern Armenia which will require the construction of a new railroad bypassing the blocked enclave of Nakhichevan. In this sense, Armenia is increasingly developing its role in North-South transportation and trade.

BACKGROUND: In recent months, several events have taken place relevant to the perspectives of strengthening of the Russia-Armenia-Iran axis. The first was the launching of the Port Kavkaz-Poti railcar-carrying ferry route between Russia and Georgia, a route designed specially for connecting Russia to Armenia. This route enables direct rail car circulation between Armenia and Russia, which has so far taken place through the Ukrainian port of Ilichevsk. It is expected to reduce the current time of transportation of cargoes between Armenia and Central Russia by half, from 20-25 days to 10-12 days, and to make it cheaper by 20 percent. This will to some extent end the severance of rail communication between Armenia and its largest trade partner, Russia, which resulted from the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict in August 1992. Although the ferry belongs to Reserve Capital Enterprising Corporation, a Swiss private company, the governments of Armenia and Russia have undertaken significant efforts to have this route opened. Moreover, the construction of a second ferry is underway, showing that the investor envisages intensifying traffic between Armenia and Russia, and, in perspective, with Central Asia as well.

Secondly, there are declared plans to explore and subsequently extract Armenian uranium reserves by the joint efforts of Russia and Armenia. A preliminary agreement was signed on April 23 during the visit of Sergei Kirienko, the head of the Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency, to Armenia. According to initial assessments made in Soviet times, Armenia possesses deposits of uranium amounting at least 30,000 tons. They will be extracted and, most likely, transported to Russia, as Armenia has no facilities of uranium enrichment, and has declared that it has no intention to start uranium enrichment on its own.

The third element is the plan to construct an oil refinery near the Armenian town of Meghri, located in southern Armenia near the Iranian border. As reported after a Russian-Armenian summit in Sochi last January, this refinery was expected to have a capacity to process up to 7 million tons of Iranian oil annually, which would be pumped into Armenia through a special pipeline from the Iranian city if Tabriz, 100 km south of Meghri. Refinery products are expected to be shipped back to Iran by rail. The cost of the whole project, including the factory, the railroad and the pipeline, is reported to be US$ 1-2 billion. Gazprom-Nafta, a subsidiary of Russia’s state-run Gazprom gas monopoly, has said it is considering investing in this refinery, and Iran will also, most likely, invest in this politically motivated project.

Finally, the last few years have witnessed expanding cooperation between Armenia and Iran in the energy sphere. The Iran-Armenia gas pipeline officially inaugurated last March, is to supply gas to Armenia in return for supplies of electric power from Armenia. To this end, a power transition line between Armenia and Iran is to be constructed in addition to the two existing lines, and two hydropower plants on the border river of Araxes are to be constructed in the near future.

IMPLICATIONS: These events can combine to lead to the formation of a new North-South railroad corridor between Russia and Iran, to replace the Novorossiysk-Tbilisi-Yerevan-Nakhichevan-Julfa route, which was active in the Soviet times but is now interrupted at two places, one being Abkhazia and the other being the Nakhichevan-Armenia border, due to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The Abkhazian sector is bypassed through the above-mentioned Port-Kavkaz-Poti ferry link, but the Nakhichevan sector is more difficult to bypass. A railroad connecting Meghri to some part of the existing Julfa-Tabriz railroad may be constructed rather easily, as the construction needed may be as little as fifty kilometers. Nevertheless, the problem of connecting Meghri with the rest of the Armenian railways (and hence, with Russia) is a more complicated task. A railroad from Meghri to any other railroad segment in Armenia (bypassing Nakhichevan) will require installing at least 200 kilometers of new rail through a mostly mountainous territory, an undertaking that will be difficult technically and expensive.

However, there are factors which may make its prospects feasible. The first is the uranium issue, as most of the Armenian uranium deposits are reported to be located in the southern Armenian province of Syunik, in which Meghri is also located. As such, Russia (and probably other investors interested in Armenian uranium) may be interested in providing funding for the project of constructing a railroad from central Armenia to the future uranium mine of the Syunik marz and eventually, to Meghri. Preliminary reports about the intention of the state-owned company Russian Railways to make large investments in Armenia may be relevant in this sense. Tehran may also be interested in constructing this link, as it will help Iran to implement its plans of developing the country’s depressed north-western region, in particular, the so-called Aras Free Trade Zone which is adjacent to the Nakhichevan and Meghri sectors of the Iranian border and has its center in Julfa.

Besides an important role in restoring the Iran-Russia railroad route, Armenia is becoming an important partner for both from the energy viewpoint as well. Russia has important energy assets in Armenia, and has pledged to help it in building a new nuclear power station. The current station at Medzamor is expected to be closed in 2016, and according to a recent statement of President Robert Kocharian, construction of a new plant could start in 2012. The prospects for exporting Armenian uranium to Russia make such ties even tighter. As for Iran, it is set to increase its import of electricity from Armenia as seen from the above-mentioned joint plans.

CONCLUSIONS: Armenia is developing several large projects in transportation and trade with Russia on the one hand, and with Iran on the other. This may eventually result in the reopening of an important railroad corridor connecting Russia with the Gulf region. Armenia may be an important partner to both regional powers partly as a linking point in that corridor, and because of its involvement in different energy projects within the interest sphere of both powers.

Source: http://www.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/4614

Construction Of Turkey Section Of Baku - Tbilisi - Kars Railway To Start In July

Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, right, Turkish President Abdullah Gul, center, and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev, left, are seen at a ceremony marking the start of construction of a railroad that will link ex-Soviet republics in the Caucasus and Central Asia with Europe bypassing Russia, near Tbilisi, Georgia, Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2007. The US$600 million rail line will connect the eastern Turkish city of Kars with the Azerbaijani capital, Baku, on the Caspian Sea, via Georgia and its capital, Tbilisi.

ANKARA - The construction of the 76km long section of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars (BTK) railway project in Turkey will start in July. Ministry of Transportation officials said on Thursday that the ground breaking ceremony for the construction of Turkey section of the BTK railway project would be held in June with the participation of presidents of Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. Georgia will build 29 km part of the railway from its border with Turkey to Akhalkalaki and will finish the renovation of an existing line that stretches from there to Tbilisi. The ground breaking ceremony for the construction of the part of the project in Georgia was held in November 2007. Turkey has allocated 380 million YTL for BTK railway project, which is qualified as "iron silk road". The railway will connect Turkey with Azerbaijan and other Turkic republics in Central Asia. The railway is expected to be operational in 2010 and carry about 30 million tons of freight a year.

Source: http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp..._Start_In_July

[Armenian]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Hope for Rails: Russian initiative for Abkhazian section raises optimism for Armenian railroad

Yerevan hails Russia’s plans to seek the restoration of a major part of what used to be a Trans-Caucasian railroad in the Soviet times, which potentially may lead to resumed transportation along the whole Abkhazian section of the railroad – an important gateway for Armenia that has been unavailable because of a regional conflict since the early ‘90s. A Russian company, “South-Caucasus Railroads”, assumed the management of the Armenian railroad on June 1, two weeks earlier than it was originally planned. In the Soviet times Armenia’s railroad networks was part of the Trans-Caucasian railroad linking the Soviet republics of Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan not only with all the other regions of the former USSR, but also with Iran (via Azerbaijan) and Turkey (via Armenia).

With the start of the Karabakh movement in 1988-1989, Turkey and Azerbaijan fully blocked all railroad gateways from Armenia and the Abkhazian section of the Trans-Caucasian railroad was blocked in consequence of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict. Thus, Armenia found itself in a total ‘railroad isolation’ from the outside world. Only one train plies between Yerevan and Tbilisi today. The main purpose of transferring the Armenian railroad under Russian management is considered in the context of Moscow’s efforts to de-block the Abkhazian section of the railroad, i.e. to ensure an immediate railroad link between Sochi, Sukhumi, Tbilisi and Yerevan. Recently, the Russian side introduced railroad troops to Abkhazia in order restore traffic along the Sochi-Sukhumi section, which elicited an angry reaction from official Tbilisi, which accused Moscow of introducing military personnel not engaged in peacekeeping missions into Georgian soil. “The problem of the idling Sochi-Sukhumi-Tbilisi railroad, no doubt, is a political problem,” Armenia’s Minister of Transport and Communications Gurgen Sargsyan said at a press conference in Yerevan. He also pointed out that the intention of the Russian side to restore the Sochi-Sukhumi connection will have a positive effect on a possible restoration of traffic along this section in the future.

According to the Armenian minister, the Russian side has already started to ship new electric locomotives and carriages for passenger conveyance to Armenia. The concessionaire, i.e. the Russian side, has pledged to invest up to $600 million in the development of the Armenian railroad, with a third of this investment to be made already in the first five years of operation. The Armenian minister also emphasized that Armenia attaches great importance to the construction of a railroad in the direction of Iran, as its importance will grow if traffic resumes along the Sochi-Sukhumi-Tbilisi railroad. “It will take Armenia seven years to build a railroad to Iran,” said Sargsyan, adding that both the Russian and Iranian sides show interest in the construction of the Armenia-Iran railroad.

Source: http://www.armenianow.com/?action=vi...g=eng&IID=1189

NATO chief urges withdrawal of Russian rail troops from Abkhazia

NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said on Tuesday Russia should pull its unarmed railroad troops out of Georgia's breakaway region of Abkhazia. "These forces should be withdrawn, and both Russia and Georgia should engage quickly in a high-level and open dialogue to de-escalate tensions," he said in a statement on Tuesday. The unarmed troops were deployed to the region on May 31 to repair rail tracks "fully in line with Russian-Georgian agreements," the Russian Foreign Ministry said. "This deployment is clearly in contravention of Georgia's sovereignty and territorial integrity," said the NATO head however. The presidents of Russia and Georgia discussed the issue over the telephone earlier Tuesday. "Russia's aid in repairing railroad tracks in Abkhazia using its railroad troops was discussed. The necessary clarifications were provided on the issue," the Kremlin press service said, adding that Dmitry Medvedev and Mikheil Saakashvili had agreed to resume discussions on the sidelines of an economic forum in St. Petersburg due on June 6-8. Tensions between Russia and Georgia have been consistently strained since Western-leaning President Mikheil Saakashvili came to power in the South Caucasus country in early 2004. The long-running row over Georgian breakaway regions, along with Tbilisi's plans to join NATO, have been major factors behind the dispute.

Source: http://en.rian.ru/world/20080603/109175875.html

[Armenian]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Russia's Air Force chief checks air defenses in Siberia, Far East

Russia's Air Force chief will visit on June 4-6 two combined Air Force and air defense armies in Siberia and the Far East, to inspect combat readiness ahead of summer training, the AF said on Wednesday. "During a scheduled working visit to the 14th Air Force and Air Defense Army in the Siberian military district and the 11th Air Force and Air Defense Army in the Far Eastern military district, the commander of the Russian Air Force, Col. Gen. Alexander Zelin, will inspect combat readiness of Air Force and air defense units," AF spokesman Lt. Col. Vladimir Drik said. Russia's Air Force is planning to conduct over 200 exercises with 350 live firing drills in the second half of 2008 under the annual summer training program. The main purpose of the intensive training during the period "is to ensure combat readiness of the Russian Air Force in order to safeguard Russia's national interests and security." IISS Military Balance 2007 estimates that the Russian Air Force has 1,650 combat-capable aircraft and 148,000 personnel.

Source: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080604/109226990.html

New chief of staff to 'revive Russia's ailing military'

Gen. Nikolai Makarov's appointment as chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces suggests higher priority will be given to modernizing the military, a top Russian military expert said on Tuesday. Deputy Defense Minister Gen. Nikolai Makarov has been appointed chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. He replaces Gen. Yury Baluyevsky, who has been appointed deputy secretary of Russia's Security Council. In an interview with RIA Novosti, Col. Gen. Leonid Ivashov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Studies, said the appointment of Gen. Makarov, former chief of Armed Forces Arms Procurement, indicates that he may "reverse the negative, destructive trends that are now plaguing the Armed Forces, and stop the technical degradation of the Army and Navy." He said the Russian military "has an acute shortage of new weaponry and military equipment, ammunition, and other technical systems." Gen. Ivashov said with the right political and financial support, Gen. Makarov would be able to turn the Armed Forces around and make them more operationally effective and improve combat readiness. He said that former General Staff chief Gen. Yury Baluyevsky had disagreed with Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov over military reforms. The new chief of the General Staff told President Dmitry Medvedev earlier on Tuesday that he was fully aware of the responsibility delegated to him and would do everything to achieve the goals set for the Armed Forces, working in conjunction with the Defense Ministry and the Security Council.

Source: http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080603/109168631.html

[HayotzAmrotz]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, right, Turkish President Abdullah Gul, center, and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev, left, are seen at a ceremony marking the start of construction of a railroad that will link ex-Soviet republics in the Caucasus and Central Asia with Europe bypassing Russia, near Tbilisi, Georgia, Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2007. The US$600 million rail line will connect the eastern Turkish city of Kars with the Azerbaijani capital, Baku, on the Caspian Sea, via Georgia and its capital, Tbilisi.

How nice of our neighbours to build a railway line connecting our Kars with their capitols. I think after the liberation we might call that railway line "Misha" in honour of the Georgian president. It's a nice railway line but if the liberation is delayed then it would be such a shame to see this project together with the much bigger Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline being blown up to very fine pieces.

[Armenian]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Moscow's continuing success in monopolizing the the Caspian Sea region's vast oil and gas distribution networks.

******************************

Russia: Courting Azerbaijan for Natural Gas

Summary

Russia’s Gazprom is in talks with Azerbaijan to purchase natural gas. Europe and Iran have also been courting Azerbaijan for its natural gas, but Gazprom has announced it is now willing to pay the same as, if not more than, the Europeans and Iranians are offering. If Azerbaijan reaches an agreement with Gazprom, it could cut off one of Europe’s options for diversifying its natural gas supplies away from Russia, while enabling Moscow to keep its natural gas exports flowing westward.

Analysis

Russian natural gas giant Gazprom is in talks with Azerbaijan to purchase natural gas. Russian Ambassador to the South Caucasus Vasily Istratov said June 4 that Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller met with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev on June 2 in Baku. Gazprom is proposing to pay the same as — and possibly more than — Europe and Iran have offered for the natural gas. This marks one of the first times that Gazprom has actually said it will put up the cash to compete with other potential natural gas buyers. If Azerbaijan goes with the Russian suitor, it could cut off one of Europe’s options for further diversifying away from Russian energy supplies and could secure Moscow’s ability to continue its own westward exports.

Russia supplied Azerbaijan with natural gas until around 2006, when Azerbaijan’s own natural gas fields came online, eliminating the country’s dependence on Russian natural gas. But obviously the infrastructure is still in place, hooking Azerbaijan into Russia’s complex spider web of pipelines running from northern Russia and Central Asia to Europe, with spurs shooting down into the Caucasus. Each of the three lines running from Russia to Azerbaijan has an annual capacity of 10-13 billion cubic meters (bcm). One of those lines was turned into a line running through Georgia to Turkey, called the South Caucasus Pipeline, which takes natural gas from Azerbaijan’s Shah Deniz field to Europe.

Shah Deniz contains 1.2 trillion cubic meters of natural gas reserves and, in its first phase of production, pumps 8.6 bcm annually, which goes to Europe. The second phase of the field is expected to pump another 8.6 bcm annually starting in 2011. It is this second phase that is drawing bids not only from Europe, but also from Iran and now Russia. Russia differs from other bidders in that its structural links to Azerbaijan already exist; it would require a simple reversal of the natural gas flow through the Soviet-era pipelines to get Azerbaijani natural gas flowing to Russia and then Europe. If phase two is to produce natural gas for Europe, the Europeans will have to build a parallel line to the South Caucasus pipeline through Turkey, which is not really a difficult project financially for the Europeans.

The battle over Shah Deniz’s second phase thus comes down to who will put up the most cash for the natural gas supplies. Iran does not have the money to compete. In the past, the Europeans have always beaten Russia in bidding contests, because Moscow refuses to spend the money. But Gazprom has offered to pay $360 per thousand cubic meters, which is on the high end of what Europe is expected to pay for natural gas by 2011. Traditionally, Gazprom has bought cheap natural gas from former Soviet states; however, recently, countries such as Turkmenistan have hiked their prices, forcing Gazprom to adjust.

With the large amount of natural gas Russia sends to Europe — approximately a quarter of Europe’s consumption — Russia depends on supplies from Central Asia to help fill the orders. But Central Asian countries are looking eastward to China as a potential energy customer, making Moscow a little jittery about its ability to meet its export contracts in the long term. Azerbaijan could fill this void. If Russia can secure the second phase of Shah Deniz, it will mean that Europe failed to do so. Sure, Europe will end up with the natural gas supplies anyway, but it will still have to get it from Russia first — at whatever price Moscow demands.

Source: http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/rus...an_natural_gas

[skhara]

Re: The Rise of the Russian Empire: Russo-Armenian Relations

Regarding the "negotiations" -- I assume this is done for show for all the sides involved. Someone like me would say "what the xxxx is the point?".