Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

[Pazooki]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

Don't worry, it's not a compliment.

Oooooooooooooohhhhh BURNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!! NOOOOOOOB U GOT OWNEDQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! QQ MORE NOOB!!


LOL JK

[Palavra]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

Like you turks came here with good intentions?

Absolutely. I have totally good intention for me.

I'd also start one on Artsakh, you forgot.

Who knew Armenians were more organized with forums? 70 million Turks and not a single English language Turkish forum?

Karabag? You should find an azeri forum for it so You may have more fun and fight. Ahead armenian warrior. Cut their head.


I am sure there are some english langauge Turkish forum(Most probably made by Turkish diasporas.) but well, I am at Turkey and last thing I need is to talk turks with english langauge..

You're right, then the purpose of this forum and possibly the opponent forum would shift to a battleground. I could just see Yerazhishdas and Federates jumping ship with sabres to try to take it over, while their Turkish counterparts attempt the same on our own. This is undesirable.

If They insult each other with intelligent words, It may reason some fun(at least for me, absolute not for mods.) but I am sure It would be a war of idiots.

Don't worry, it's not a compliment.

Anti-xxxish? that is absolute stupid thing for an armenian.(what can you gain.) Specially, If you prefer a turkish guy to a xxxish one. By the way, xxxs are generally rich. I prefer to become a xxx too.(excluding their religion.)


By the way, dont you guys aware how much we Turks contribute your forums? without us, You would become bored. No need to thanks.

Just forget past and lets become friend.

[jgk3]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

By the way, dont you guys aware how much we Turks contribute your forums? without us, You would become bored. No need to thanks.

Just forget past and lets become friend.

What you Turks contribute here is an opportunity to hear us out

[Federate]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

Karabag? You should find an azeri forum for it so You may have more fun and fight. Ahead armenian warrior. Cut their head.

Aww, Turks don't give much of a fight in the Artsakh issue? How sad. I guess it's only normal because it defies logic to ask for Northern Cyprus independence but then blockade a country over a similar dispute that has 10x more credibility. So much for Turkic brotherhood? And I said Artsakh. You can use your "Qaramarababağ" to refer to something else. Go cut a priest's throat or something, Turk.

I am sure there are some english langauge Turkish forum(Most probably made by Turkish diasporas.) but well, I am at Turkey and last thing I need is to talk turks with english langauge..

Understandable but the Turkish diaspora is pretty big and many in Turkey know English. So I was hoping there'd be at least one.

If They insult each other with intelligent words, It may reason some fun(at least for me, absolute not for mods.) but I am sure It would be a war of idiots.

I'm not the idiot who knows the genocide happened but denies it anyway. Armenian ammunition is the truth, we don't resort to insults unless we are provoked into doing so. Armenians and Turks can have reasonable dialogue. The third entity to the east is another story.

By the way, dont you guys aware how much we Turks contribute your forums? without us, You would become bored. No need to thanks.

Just forget past and lets become friend.

Besides some exceptions, you are overrating your contributions lol. We were doing fine and had healthy arguments even before you arrived

[jgk3]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

for christ sakes, just google filthy Armenian and you'll find your English speaking Anti-Armenian audience.

[Palavra]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

What you Turks contribute here is an opportunity to hear us out

That is what I always wished and dreamed. To be insulted by weird guys I hear you.(Dont take it personal. That weird english langauge)

Aww, Turks don't give much of a fight in the Artsakh issue? How sad. I guess it's only normal because it defies logic to ask for Northern Cyprus independence but then blockade a country over a similar dispute that has 10x more credibility. So much for Turkic brotherhood? And I said Artsakh. You can use your "Qaramarababağ" to refer to something else.

Well, You missunderstood me. Turks care for karabag issue but reason is only to support our brothers(azeris.) that we love and support them. It is not our land. So Azeris will absolutely fight more fiercely.

Well okey, geopolitic is also another reason..

Understandable but the Turkish diaspora is pretty big and many in Turkey know English. So I was hoping there'd be at least one.

There should be at somewhere..

I'm not the idiot who knows the genocide happened but denies it anyway.

My friend, If someone know something, He cannot deny reality of it. So That accusation is a little idiotic too..(Not sure, who are you accusing.)

Armenian ammunition is the truth, we don't resort to insults unless we are provoked into doing so.

Too bad, You have a bad quality ammunation. It looks like your ammunation is a little harmed with lies. Next time, Protect your ammunation better.

Provoked? You mean, Even If You think "Turk" as a word, You would be provoked? Otherwise, It would be difficult to explain what there are so much insult at these forum against turks.

Armenians and Turks can have reasonable dialogue.

No they cannot. It is not a secret that Armenians dislike turks and turks dislike armenians. Maybe our goverment may a reasonable dialogue but I suspect it in short time too..

The third entity to the east is another story.

I am sure, If You have karabag, You wont have any problem with them..(By the way, A turk cannot use word "Artsakh" because of pronouncation problems.)

Besides some exceptions, you are overrating your contributions lol. We were doing fine and had healthy arguments even before you arrived

Healty arguments? Absolutely, not about issues related with Turks.

Mister A- Turks are evil.
Mister B- Yeah, I agree all Turks are moron.
Mister A- Stupid Murderer Turks.
Mister B- A good turks is a death turk.. Turkey Turks.
Mister C- Yes, Mister A and Mister B, You are genious. You absolutely see turks as they are.
Mister D- xxxx Turks.


I do not call this as healty argument but maybe "healty" agreement..

[jgk3]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

Healty arguments? Absolutely, not about issues related with Turks.

Mister A- Turks are evil.
Mister B- Yeah, I agree all Turks are moron.
Mister A- Stupid Murderer Turks.
Mister B- A good turks is a death turk.. Turkey Turks.
Mister C- Yes, Mister A and Mister B, You are genious. You absolutely see turks as they are.
Mister D- xxxx Turks.


I do not call this as healty argument but maybe "healty" agreement..

I agree with you here, it keeps our attention towards adversaries at an overly simplified level, it promotes group think also and I can't stand that.

[Federate]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

Well, You missunderstood me. Turks care for karabag issue but reason is only to support our brothers(azeris.) that we love and support them. It is not our land. So Azeris will absolutely fight more fiercely.

Well okey, geopolitic is also another reason..

Yes, I see the blind support but you can't discuss Artsakh with "azeris" because they resort to pseudohistory. But with Turks, there is a hope, the goal is not necessarily to pick a fight.

My friend, If someone know something, He cannot deny reality of it. So That accusation is a little idiotic too..(Not sure, who are you accusing.)

Were you not the Turk who admit the genocide happened in another thread here but that you can't support its recognition or something? Thanks for pointing out how idiotic that kind of thinking is, it's what I was doing.

Provoked? You mean, Even If You think "Turk" as a word, You would be provoked? Otherwise, It would be difficult to explain what there are so much insult at these forum against turks.

Given the history of Turkish members in Armenian forums, the precedent has been set that most of you infest these forums to challenge established history - for revisionism. That's why such stuff happens.

No they cannot. It is not a secret that Armenians dislike turks and turks dislike armenians. Maybe our goverment may a reasonable dialogue but I suspect it in short time too..

Not true, I have had reasonable dialogue with many Turks in the past and I know others who have too. And it has involved politics for most of the time and most have ended up agreeing that a genocide did happen. So even the most sensitive topic can be discussed normally.

I am sure, If You have karabag, You wont have any problem with them..(By the way, A turk cannot use word "Artsakh" because of pronouncation problems.)

We won't, they will. So if they will, we will.

Healty arguments? Absolutely, not about issues related with Turks.

Mister A- Turks are evil.
Mister B- Yeah, I agree all Turks are moron.
Mister A- Stupid Murderer Turks.
Mister B- A good turks is a death turk.. Turkey Turks.
Mister C- Yes, Mister A and Mister B, You are genious. You absolutely see turks as they are.
Mister D- xxxx Turks.


I do not call this as healty argument but maybe "healty" agreement..

You do add another dimension to the discussions but again, overrated. What you describe is not always the case, there are Armenian forum members here who have bickered over the way to approach the issue.

[Palavra]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

Were you not the Turk who admit the genocide happened in another thread here but that you can't support its recognition or something? Thanks for pointing out how idiotic that kind of thinking is, it's what I was doing.

These two are totally different things. I am not armenian so I will not fight for armenian cause..

Given the history of Turkish members in Armenian forums, the precedent has been set that most of you infest these forums to challenge established history - for revisionism. That's why such stuff happens.

When You went Turkish forums, It would be you who is challange established history. You know, History is a changable acording to nations or people..

Not true, I have had reasonable dialogue with many Turks in the past and I know others who have too. And it has involved politics for most of the time and most have ended up agreeing that a genocide did happen. So even the most sensitive topic can be discussed normally.

Realy? You talk turks who want to talk you(Minority) and most probably halfly believed genocide thing.

[Pazooki]

Re: Abdullah Gul: Armenian?

I am sure, If You have karabag, You wont have any problem with them..(By the way, A turk cannot use word "Artsakh" because of pronouncation problems.)

What about Ararat? Doesn't sound hard to pronounce. Or just because of the fact that you don't wan't to call it by it's original name

Hmm I can't pronounce "Turkey" so I guess I'll just call it Sh!t