Originally posted by Armanen
View Post
Originally posted by Armanen
View Post
So this leaves us with a linguistic connection – true linguistics academics and scientists have proven a degree of uniformity among a select group of languages, which span several continents. But science and academia also teach us the frailty of linking linguistics with national culture, character and race – languages can easily be passed on, merged, re-created, become extinct – linking a hypothetical language family, with a hypothetical racial connection, and a whole host of other yet to be investigated theories to whole national groups is ok, as long as they are payed due worth and not simply dismissed as reality, but merely a possibility..
The more important question is what makes this ‘indo Europeans’ special. Aside from the very natural human trait of making ourselves feel superior to others, threes no real historical flesh to the ‘superiority’ argument many people propose. If early Aryan tribes existed as a united racial/national entity were they dominant? Perhaps. But were they any more dominant then Mongols? Or the invading Turks? Arabs? And then why use dominance as criteria? Armenians have rarely been dominant over their much larger neighbors, and yet we still survived through the millenia – that’s an admirable quality – not, for example the dominance shown by Anglo-Saxon jute tribes who ruthlessly massacred indigenous brits, then continued to imperialise smaller helpless nations. Importance? Importance is subjective. I for example take solace in the fact that Armenians were always few in numbers, as apposed to your hypothetical indo-European race, which would include a sizable chunk of the human population.
If we really want to back into history and knowledge the breadth of Armenians linguistic and anthropological past, we would see that Armenian Nation was comprised of several different tribes and ethine, and by no means exclusive to the hypothetical indo-European ‘race’ or language or culture for that matter. Armenians developed their unique civilisation in the Armenian highlands, and whatever subsequent Aryan tribe hypothetically migrated from these lands, established their own unique civilisations in their own part of the world.
"History is an extension of a nations character."
Indulging ourselves in Aryan mythology/politics does xxxx all to our Armenian cause, aside from complicating our pre-history. Put it this way the ancient civilizations that existed in the Armenian highlands from as early as man started grazing lands were not merely part of grander superior Aryan super race, but rather proto-Armenians who lived in these lands and slowly developed their own national consciousness, the same national character Njdeh refers to. This the theory I will hold onto, I will not deem it as fact, but rather an alternative to the unproven.

Leave a comment: