Any film, whether it's about a world war or genocide, has potential to succeed regardless of "who knows about the events." It doesn't really matter whether there's an audience. If it's a good film, it's a good film. How many films are there about the Holocaust and World War II? Why do Schindler's List stand out from these lists? To be completely honest, that's all that matters. Instead of wasting our audience's time with countless films about the Armenian Genocide, there really needs to be only one. Sure, we can still release them, but only one will have the impact it needs to have.
I think a lot of Armenian Genocide films are going to take a specific route. Atom Egoyan's Aratat took a much more personal and complex route, weaving together different characters and storylines, rather than emphasizing the tragedy. It's a good film and it works, but it's not quite the film to make a statement.
More importantly, the film should not have Armenians behind it unless they know what they are doing. There are certain Armenian filmmakers who have enough recognition elsewhere and think they can make an impact worldwide and they can't. We need studios behind us, professional screenwriters and filmmakers. The screenplay won't be written overnight in Armenia... if it's going to work and make an impact, it's going to be written in Hollywood.
Imagine watching Chinese actors taking the role of the warriors in Apocalypto, running around screaming KAYAKA KAYAKA
? It's almost the same case here. I think Armenians should be in the movie and there CAN be actors from Hollywood, etc. AS WELL. But the majority has to be Armenians because no matter how hard any actors try, they won't get it completely right ... or perhaps even right AT ALL. It's not about professional actors/actresses ... it's about having ARMENIAN people in a movie about THEY'RE painful past. It's as simple as that.


!
Leave a comment: