2 of 2
Armenians and The Silver Screen
Part I - Recent Movies

Modern Love
(France-Canada)
By DEREK ELLEY
A Pathe Distribution (in France)/Alliance Atlantis Vivafilm (in Canada) release of a Galatee Films, Delante Films presentation of a Galatee, Delante, France 2 Cinema (France)/Cirrus Communications (Canada) production, in association with Poste Image, La Banque Postale, Image Uni Etoile 5, with participation of Canal Plus, TPS Star, Kiosque. (International sales: Pathe Pictures Intl., London.) Produced by Valentine Perrin, Jacques Perrin, Caroline Adrian, Antoine Rein. Co-producer, Pierre Even. Directed, written by Stephane Kazandjian.
With: Alexandra Lamy, Stephane Rousseau, Berenice Bejo, Pierre Francois Martin-Laval, Clotilde Courau, Stephane Debac, Melanie Bernier, Valerie Karsenti, Kad Merad, David La Haye, Thomas Jouannet, Francis Leplay, Raphaelle Agogue, Eric Naggar, Mai Ahn Le, Annie Gregorio.
French cinema's on-off flirtation with the contempo musical continues with "Modern Love," a bright and breezy piece of fluff that doesn't pretend to anything other than entertainment. Tale of a movie director's emotional tangles -- intercut with scenes from a tuner he's just directed -- slides back and forth between romantic comedy and old-style musical with considerable charm and a cast that's lively and upbeat. Not one for the serious crowd, the March 12 release should score with young, romantically inclined female auds, especially in Europe, and with overseas film weeks in search of something different.
Sophomore pic by writer-director Stephane Kazandjian (the "American Pie"-like "Sexy Boys") is far more engaging than last year's leaden "Love Songs," without the candy-colored campiness of 2002's "Hypnotized & Hysterical." But with all the musical numbers confined to the film-within-a-film, the movie doesn't attempt (as "Jeanne and the Perfect Guy" did a decade ago) to resuscitate the through-composed style popularized by Jacques Demy and Michel Legrand. Overall, it's more of a knowing tribute than a full-scale tuner.
Eric Mericourt (Pierre Francois Martin-Laval) is a depressive filmmaker who's finally given the boot by his g.f. Marie (Clotilde Courau) on New Year's Eve. Three years later, he has an adoring new partner, Anne (Melanie Bernier), and is basking in the B.O. success of "Modern Love," a musical centered on two people in search of the perfect partner -- graphic artist Marianne (Alexandra Lamy) and filthy rich magazine publisher Vincent (Quebecois singer-comedian Stephane Rousseau).
Elsewhere in Paris is sassy, unlucky-in-love Elsa (Berenice Bejo), who, as soon as she swears she'll only go out with the Perfect Man in the future -- ping! -- up pops handsome, charming, wealthy Jerome (Stephane Debac). The only problem is, Jerome seems to have a lot of gay friends and Elsa finds it difficult to even get to first base with him.
Meanwhile, out shopping one day with Anne, Eric bumps into Marie, who apologizes for dumping him so brutally and suggests a drink sometime. One thing leads to another, and soon Marie asks him to impregnate her so she and her low-sperm-count b.f. can become parents.
Script lightly juggles the two story threads, as Eric and Marie start to fall for each other again and Elsa, despairing of ever getting it on with Jerome, has a one-night stand with an old b.f. (Thomas Jouannet). Intercut throughout -- with no warning, apart from higher-gloss lensing by Regis Blondeau and ritzier production design -- are the five musical numbers charting the ups and downs of the movie couple, Marianne and Vincent.
Martin-Laval, looking and acting like a younger Albert Brooks, makes an undemonstrative lead; most of the pic's energy comes from its distaff cast, led by the perky Bejo (from retro spy spoof "OSS 117") and likeably goofy Courau. Lamy and Rousseau supply some old-fashioned razzle-dazzle in the hummable numbers by Martin Rappeneau (son of helmer Jean-Paul) and Benjamin Seilles.
Supports are bright, especially Valerie Karsenti as a friend of Elsa's who surprisingly falls for a Vietnamese lesbian (Mai Ahn Le). Kad Merad ("Bienvenue chez les Ch'tis") has a dry cameo as Eric's philosophical masseur.
Camera (color), Regis Blondeau; editor, Philippe Bourgeuil; music, Martin Gamet; songs, Martin Rappeneau, Benjamin Seilles; art director, Philippe Chiffre; costume designers, Agnes Falque, Emmanuelle Pertus; sound (Dolby Digital), Patrick Rousseau, Martin Pinsonnault; choreographer, Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui; associate producers, Josee Vallee, Richard Speer; assistant director, Thomas Trefouel; casting, Aurelie Avram. Reviewed at Gaumont Champs Elysees Ambassade 2, Paris, March 12, 2008. Running time: 90 MIN.
THE "TARGET" - NATIONAL VALUES AND HUMAN EMOTIONS
By Hasmik Haroutiunian
AZG Armenian Daily
21/05/2008
Culture
"I remember, the audience kept silence after the premiere of the
film. Then one of the soldiers approached me, shook my hand and said,
"Thank you. Now I understood for what I fought". These words were the
best appraisal of my film", says film-director Shavarsh Vardanian,
who is one of the active participants of 1988 movement. He made films
of Khodzalu, Shahumian and Shushi liberation battles during Artsakh
war to tell the future generations about the heroism and victorious
spirit of the Armenian people.
"The others took up arms to go to war; my weapon was my camera".
In "Tirakh" (Target) film shot in 2000 Shavarsh Vardanian comments on
the struggle for existence in Artsakh with the eyes of documentalist
and a man who took part in the war.
It seems that the film is an autobiography but in the background we
see the battle-field, the disaster of the war and the marriage of
the hero as a call of new life at the end of the film.
By Hasmik Haroutiunian
AZG Armenian Daily
21/05/2008
Culture
"I remember, the audience kept silence after the premiere of the
film. Then one of the soldiers approached me, shook my hand and said,
"Thank you. Now I understood for what I fought". These words were the
best appraisal of my film", says film-director Shavarsh Vardanian,
who is one of the active participants of 1988 movement. He made films
of Khodzalu, Shahumian and Shushi liberation battles during Artsakh
war to tell the future generations about the heroism and victorious
spirit of the Armenian people.
"The others took up arms to go to war; my weapon was my camera".
In "Tirakh" (Target) film shot in 2000 Shavarsh Vardanian comments on
the struggle for existence in Artsakh with the eyes of documentalist
and a man who took part in the war.
It seems that the film is an autobiography but in the background we
see the battle-field, the disaster of the war and the marriage of
the hero as a call of new life at the end of the film.
10TH SAN FRANCISCO BLACK FILM FESTIVAL (PART ONE)
Peter Wong
Beyond Chron, CA
June 11 2008
To write about the San Francisco Black Film Festival is not to give
hosannas at discovering a previously unknown film festival. This black
film showcase has thrived very well for ten years. Writing about the
festival, then, needs to be a giving thanks for exposure to films
not seen at other local festivals.
"The People's Advocate: The Life And Times Of Charles
R. Garry" reacquaints viewers with one of San Francisco's
most famous (or notorious, depending on your point of view) criminal
defense attorneys. This advocate gained fame during the 1960s with
his vigorous defenses of various leftist personalities, principally
Huey Newton, Bobby Seale, and other members of the Black Panther Party.
Director Hrag Yedalian's documentary takes a "just the
facts" approach to depicting Garry's life. The viewer is
thus treated to period news footage, interviews with Garry's
contemporaries, and a near overuse of title cards. It is suggested
regular exposure to anti-Armenian prejudice (Garry was actually
Armenian) predisposed the future attorney to use his legal skills on
behalf of other discriminated groups.
Former Black Panthers talk about how the attorney understood implicitly
the injustices that the black power group opposed. Garry displayed a
gift for turning the courtroom into a lectern to show Middle Americans
just how clueless they were about black culture. One jaw-dropping
anecdote in the film concerns Garry's questioning potential
jurors on their knowledge (if any) of singer James Brown or the song
"Papa's Got A Brand New Bag."
However, the police outpaced the civilians in the cluelessness race
when it came to understanding the rising leftist movements of the
1960s. Having shinier shoes and newer jeans than that worn by the
typical anti-war activist is not a recipe for blending unobtrusively
into a protest group. Garry successfully exploited police ignorance
in the courtroom through such tactics as getting cops on the witness
stand to inadvertently damn themselves as rat finks.
The attorney's empathy for leftists fighting oppression
eventually turned out to be a mixed blessing. That talent may have
allowed him to vigorously represent controversial leftists such
as Los Siete. But it also blinded him to the fatal madness of the
Reverend Jim Jones. Garry's enchantment with the progressive
dream offered by Jones' People's Temple led to his becoming
a public apologist for the Temple. The act of becoming an unwilling
presence near the mass Jonestown suicides hit the attorney with the
world's nastiest reality check. Yedalian's film states the
attorney never recovered emotionally from that shock.
The material described above is dramatic and humorous and even
tragic. So why does "The People's Advocate" feel so dull
and shallow?
Yedalian makes the mistake of keeping Garry's life mounted on
a pedestal. Treating him as generally flawless undercuts objective
assessment of the attorney's work. The cops who clashed with Garry
over the years or less enthusiastic co-workers at Garry's firm
needed acknowledgment in the film. Such acknowledgment need not be
agreement with their opposing positions. But even non-flattering
appraisals can provide necessary perspective on Garry's
achievements.
How much of the film's emotional shortcomings derived from
its apparent presentational shortcuts (e.g. excess use of title
cards)? It's unclear. But the resulting film does a disservice to
an important participant in some of the 1960s' biggest historical
flashpoints.
........
Peter Wong
Beyond Chron, CA
June 11 2008
To write about the San Francisco Black Film Festival is not to give
hosannas at discovering a previously unknown film festival. This black
film showcase has thrived very well for ten years. Writing about the
festival, then, needs to be a giving thanks for exposure to films
not seen at other local festivals.
"The People's Advocate: The Life And Times Of Charles
R. Garry" reacquaints viewers with one of San Francisco's
most famous (or notorious, depending on your point of view) criminal
defense attorneys. This advocate gained fame during the 1960s with
his vigorous defenses of various leftist personalities, principally
Huey Newton, Bobby Seale, and other members of the Black Panther Party.
Director Hrag Yedalian's documentary takes a "just the
facts" approach to depicting Garry's life. The viewer is
thus treated to period news footage, interviews with Garry's
contemporaries, and a near overuse of title cards. It is suggested
regular exposure to anti-Armenian prejudice (Garry was actually
Armenian) predisposed the future attorney to use his legal skills on
behalf of other discriminated groups.
Former Black Panthers talk about how the attorney understood implicitly
the injustices that the black power group opposed. Garry displayed a
gift for turning the courtroom into a lectern to show Middle Americans
just how clueless they were about black culture. One jaw-dropping
anecdote in the film concerns Garry's questioning potential
jurors on their knowledge (if any) of singer James Brown or the song
"Papa's Got A Brand New Bag."
However, the police outpaced the civilians in the cluelessness race
when it came to understanding the rising leftist movements of the
1960s. Having shinier shoes and newer jeans than that worn by the
typical anti-war activist is not a recipe for blending unobtrusively
into a protest group. Garry successfully exploited police ignorance
in the courtroom through such tactics as getting cops on the witness
stand to inadvertently damn themselves as rat finks.
The attorney's empathy for leftists fighting oppression
eventually turned out to be a mixed blessing. That talent may have
allowed him to vigorously represent controversial leftists such
as Los Siete. But it also blinded him to the fatal madness of the
Reverend Jim Jones. Garry's enchantment with the progressive
dream offered by Jones' People's Temple led to his becoming
a public apologist for the Temple. The act of becoming an unwilling
presence near the mass Jonestown suicides hit the attorney with the
world's nastiest reality check. Yedalian's film states the
attorney never recovered emotionally from that shock.
The material described above is dramatic and humorous and even
tragic. So why does "The People's Advocate" feel so dull
and shallow?
Yedalian makes the mistake of keeping Garry's life mounted on
a pedestal. Treating him as generally flawless undercuts objective
assessment of the attorney's work. The cops who clashed with Garry
over the years or less enthusiastic co-workers at Garry's firm
needed acknowledgment in the film. Such acknowledgment need not be
agreement with their opposing positions. But even non-flattering
appraisals can provide necessary perspective on Garry's
achievements.
How much of the film's emotional shortcomings derived from
its apparent presentational shortcuts (e.g. excess use of title
cards)? It's unclear. But the resulting film does a disservice to
an important participant in some of the 1960s' biggest historical
flashpoints.
........
(Not so recent!)

SYSTEM OF A DOWN SCREAMING OUT LOUD
Andrew Sheridan
The Massachusetts Daily Collegian
March 10 2008
MA
One point five million people dead, thousands of children orphaned.
Three-fourths of an entire population murdered in the span of two
years, and a guilty government in complete denial. Such was the state
of the Armenian Genocide of 1915, "the forgotten massacre." It was
the inspiration for the Holocaust, the first Great War crime of the
20th century and the topic of the new documentary, "Screamers."
The film is the product of the Grammy-winning band System of a Down,
and from the start, one might think that it is simply a profile of
the group. It begins at a System concert in the U.S., where rabid
fans flock the stadium, and the members prepare to perform. The
emphasis quickly changes, however, to the political activity going
on at the event.
Tents and stands dot the area, distributing literature about genocide
and circling petitions. Activists push their social agendas freely
with the blessing of the group, who announce their intentions right
off the bat saying, "This band just started to make you ask questions."
The concert, which took place in 2005, was held on the 90th anniversary
of the Armenian genocide. The band members, all of Armenian descent,
feel strongly about the event, which is largely unknown and denied
openly by many of the world's governments.
The documentary mixes interviews of band members, survivors of war
crimes and experts. It is also laced with live performances by SOAD,
in which the sometimes incomprehensible lyrics are layered over the
instrumentals, revealing their highly political nature often lost on
casual System listeners.
Though the film chronicles genocide in general, much focus is given to
the near-extermination of the Armenians. Following the introduction of
band member Serj Tankian's 96 year-old grandfather Stepan Haytayan,
a survivor, the film starts in on a heart-wrenching depiction of
Turkey circa World War I.
Unbeknownst to most Americans, during the turn of the century the
Christian Albanian population of Turkey was being persecuted by the
Muslim majority. When war broke out, Turkish leader Mehmet Resat used
the confusion to carry out the mass execution of the Albanian people.
The narration is supplemented by poignant accounts of the terrible
incident from survivors and was made even more effective by
black-and-white images of the carnage and death.
After Turkey is discussed, the focus of the film is widened to genocide
in general throughout the twentieth century. As one expert says,
"Genocide is about using the cover of an overall conflict to deal
with ethnic ... claimants that you've been wanting to get out of the
way for a long time."
>From the Holocaust to Rwanda, Kosovo, Bosnia, Kurdistan and even
Darfur, "Screamers" profiles some of the lowest points in human
history in graphic detail.
Chilling accounts from those left behind are almost too much to bear at
times, and full color photographs of recent events bring the conflicts
a little too close to home. Not for the faint of heart or the weak
of stomach, these scenes are well edited and make a significant impact.
The latter part of the piece is dedicated to the United States and its
responses to past atrocities. After every single act of genocide in
the past century, a high-ranking U.S. official has publicly denounced
the act, boldly saying "never again." Time and time again, however,
the government witnesses the murder of thousands and does nothing
because of political interests.
Released in 2006, "Screamers" has been shown at theaters and film
festivals around the world, bringing home awards at Sundance and
Montreal. The DVD, which debuted at the end of 2007, contains a
backstage tour with System as well as additional songs and press
interviews with the artists.
It has been acclaimed by critics nationwide and for good reason. At
times powerful and eye-opening, the film succeeds in the band's
original goal of making you ask questions. It doesn't stand out from
other documentaries in terms of production values or pacing; but in
terms of impact and information, it is one of the best of the year.
Those who are simply looking for an entertaining movie to pass the time
should most likely look elsewhere, but for the politically minded -
and System of a Down fan - "Screamers" is top-notch.



Leave a comment: