Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alexandros
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?




    Time to recall the story of the Tuzla Armenian children’s camp: a story of seizure

    21 June 2009, Sunday

    EMİNE KART ANKARA

    Article 38 of the Lausanne Treaty says, “The Turkish Government undertakes to assure full and complete protection of life and liberty to all inhabitants of Turkey without distinction of birth, nationality, language, race or religion.”

    And Article 42 of the same treaty says: “The Turkish Government undertakes to grant full protection to the churches, synagogues, cemeteries and other religious establishments of the above-mentioned minorities. All facilities and authorization will be granted to the pious foundations, and to the religious and charitable institutions of the said minorities at present existing in Turkey, and the Turkish Government will not refuse to provide, for the formation of new religious and charitable institutions, the necessary facilities which are guaranteed to other private institutions of that nature.”

    The time now seems ripe to reread the treaty in order to decide whether the aforementioned articles are being fairly implemented as Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has recently become Turkey's first head of government to acknowledge publicly that a “fascist approach” had been displayed in dealing with minorities in the past.

    “For years, these things were done in this country,” Erdoğan said. “People of other ethnicities were driven from the country. Did we gain anything because of that? This was the result of a fascist approach.”

    A March report by the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV) revealed clearly that non-Muslim Turks still face “anti-democratic practices.”

    “Only a short while after the Treaty of Lausanne, it became obvious that the state did not intend to implement the rights it was supposed to give,” lawyer Kezban Hatemi, a co-author of the report, then said, citing other discriminatory laws and practices. The most detrimental one was the 1936 Declaration, in which non-Muslim foundations were given the status of “affiliated” foundations and placed under the guardianship of the Directorate General for Foundations (VGM), which “played a crucial role in implementing repressive policies” imposed on non-Muslim foundations.

    “More than 30 [pieces of fixed property] of the Armenian community were seized, on the unlawful basis that they were acquired after 1936. The Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp is one of the most striking and heartbreaking examples of the seizure of properties from the Armenian non-Muslim foundations,” Hatemi said then, pointing out that Hrant Dink, a Turkish-Armenian journalist murdered in 2007, was among the first group of children who built the camp, which he later managed with his wife for many years.

    ‘Humanity is continuity’

    “… If there was a continuity of that thing which was created … if it served a purpose, I wouldn't grieve this much. All in all, humanity is continuity; a human being can utilize what another human being created. Nay, there is no such thing, either. They left it just like that, as a wreck,” says Dink in a 2007 documentary titled “Swallow's Nest,” which explains the story of the Tuzla Armenian Children's Camp -- an actual story of confiscation.

    The elegiac documentary shot by Bülent Arınlı shows Dink walking around the wreckage of the camp where this chivalrous man and his wife Rakel grew up. The couple once took over the administration of the Tuzla Children's Camp and began looking after countless Armenian children. The camp underwent difficult times under the accusation of “breeding Armenian militants” and was finally confiscated by the state in 1983. Following the closure of the camp, Dink was taken into custody and arrested three times due to his political views.

    Since then, ownership of the camp has changed hands five times, and nothing new has been built on the land where the wreckage of the camp stands. Apparently, Dink had started feeling like an exile in his own country after this camp was seized by the state.

    Rakel’s dear Chutak

    Lawyer Fethiye Çetin, also representing the Dink family in the ongoing murder trial, underlines that a certain camp tries to legitimize the wrongful approach towards non-Muslim minorities by referring to the founding members of the Turkish Republic.

    “This is definitely not true. Until the 1970s, non-Muslim foundations were somehow able to maintain properties. The mentality surviving in the main opposition Republican People's Party's [CHP] petition to the Constitutional Court against amendments on the Law on Foundations is based on the infamous 1974 decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals that upheld this discriminatory policy and provided it with legal legitimacy,” Çetin told Sunday's Zaman.

    Now the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) is facing yet another test of sincerity after Erdoğan's recent remarks.

    “In order to get rid of this shame, the state can expropriate the land of the camp; build a nice orphanage; and name it after Hrant Dink, and we will do our best to help the state in such situation,” Çetin said, when asked what could be done to honor this chivalrous man.

    In a preface written for a book titled “Armenian Children's Camp of Tuzla: A Story of Seizure,” the second edition of which was published last year, Rakel Dink asks whether it is Armenians' fate to have their belongings seized by others, to be made unable to live in a place they themselves had built, inhabited and given life to.

    “How can anyone's heart bear this? Neither the tears shed, nor can the suffering of the heart fully describe this injustice. In the Holy Bible, Zacchaeus, known to be the collector of unfair taxes, says to Jesus, ‘If I have taken anything more than the law allows or if I've defrauded anyone I will restore four times as much.' Then Jesus answers: ‘Salvation has come to this house today.' Salvation will come to Turkey the day it confronts its past and says no to discrimination; that day will be the day when it will prosper and roses will grow there instead of thorns,' says Rakel Dink.

    “We couldn't see our grandchildren eat the fruits of their own trees and those who, for this reason, decided not to plant trees any more. Can this story of seizure make any sense to anybody?” asks Rakel Dink. “My dear Chutak [violin in Armenian], you say ‘I am not dead yet,' in the documentary titled ‘The Swallow's Nest,' telling the story of our Tuzla camp. You may be taken away from us physically but, yes, you aren't dead and you will never be. You are born anew in many people's hearts and in their aspirations and will continue to be so,” she tells her Chutak, Hrant.

    “They ruthlessly cut short the epic telling the story of the corridor where we played five stones, the stones that we painted together, the so-called ‘soup of ninety-nine foods' we used to make with the remains of various foods to economize and many more precious memories. They didn't give us the chance to watch our children running down the same corridor and to be happy together there. They didn't give us the chance to have our hair grow grey on the same pillow either. No, they didn't. …”


    Hrant Dink (L) a Turkish-Armenian journalist murdered in 2007, was among the first group of children who built the camp, which he later managed with his wife for many years.



    Tuzla Children's Camp underwent difficult times under the accusation of “breeding Armenian militants” and was finally confiscated by the state in 1983.



    Hrant Dink (L) and his wife also worked to repair the children’s camp.


    Link

    Leave a comment:


  • Eddo211
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    U.S. Slams Turkey's Human Rights




    Thursday February 26, 2009

    The U.S. State Department released its 2008 Human Rights Report on Turkey Thursday. Don't be caught reading it in Turkey, or spreading it around there: you might be charged with "insulting Turkish identity"--an actual, actionable crime in that paradox of a nation.

    The report makes for uncomfortable reading:

    The government generally respected the human rights of its citizens; however, serious problems remained in some areas. During the year human rights organizations documented a rise in cases of torture, beatings, and abuse by security forces. Security forces committed unlawful killings; the number of arrests and prosecutions in these cases was low compared with the number of incidents, and convictions remained rare. Prison conditions remained poor, with chronic overcrowding and insufficient staff training. Law enforcement officials did not always provide detainees immediate access to attorneys as required by law.

    Just as it claims it's a democracy where all people enjoy equal rights, Turkey also claims it has no political prisoners. That, too, is a fabrication by its blind-spotting Ministry of Justice, which has a convenient method of hiding political prisoners. It brands them terrorists. According to the State Department report, there were several thousand political prisoners, including leftists, rightists, and Islamists, and contended that the government does not distinguish them as such. The government claimed that alleged political prisoners were in fact charged with being members of, or assisting, terrorist organizations. According to the government, 2,232 convicts and 2,017 pretrial detainees were being held in prison on terrorism charges through September 2007.

    As for press freedom and freedom of expression, the latest incident on the floor of the Turkish parliament, where a Kurdish legislator was vilified for speaking Kurdish (the television station carrying his speech cut him off once he stopped speaking Turkish) is revealing.

    "The government, particularly the police and judiciary," the report states, "limited freedom of expression through the use of constitutional restrictions and numerous laws including articles of the penal code prohibiting insults to the government, the state, "Turkishness," Ataturk, or the institutions and symbols of the republic. Other laws also restricted speech, such as the Antiterror Law and laws governing the press and elections."
    It's not East Germany in the 1970s, to be sure. But that's no consolation to those who'd rather see Turkey, ostensibly the largest Muslim democracy after Pakistan (Pakistan? a democracy?) live up to the name.

    Read the full report:

    Leave a comment:


  • Alexandros
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    CONGRESSMAN BILIRAKIS QUESTIONS WHY TURKEY CONTINUES TO PROSECUTE INDIVIDUALS WHO DISCUSS THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

    June 18, 2009, 9:10 am

    Washington, DC - In a hearing yesterday before the Subcommittee on Europe in the House of Representatives, Congressman Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), raised strong concerns regarding the Turkish government's ongoing prosecution of journalists and academics under the auspices of Article 301, which penalizes discussion of the Armenian Genocide.


    Bianka Dodov, Rep. Bilirakis and Bryan Ardouny prior to Gordon's testimony.


    Rep. Bilirakis asked Philip Gordon, Assistant Secretary for Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs at the Department of State, who was testifying about the Administration's policies in Europe, "In light of Turkey's continued prosecution of intellectuals who express themselves, what steps will you outline with the Turkish government to ensure greater freedom of press and expression in Turkey?"

    Gordon replied, "The U.S., everywhere, and the Obama Administration, is a strong proponent of freedom of expression, freedom of the media, freedom of the press, free societies. Turkey took some steps last year to revise Article 301 of its penal code, that made it more difficult to have political prosecutions, that was an important step forward. [Turkey] would do well to continue down that path and allow for more freedom of expression. And we have a constant dialogue with the Turkish government about these issues and we'll continue to make that view clear."

    "The Assembly commends Congressman Bilirakis for his defense of the truth. Whether it is Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, highly paid lobbyists arguing against the Armenian Genocide Resolution in Congress or lawsuits filed in U.S. courts, such as the recent Massachusetts case in which a federal judge upheld the Commonwealth's decision to exclude genocide denial materials in its curriculum, Turkey's campaign of denial continues," stated Assembly Executive Director, Bryan Ardouny.

    Established in 1972, the Armenian Assembly of America is the largest Washington-based nationwide organization promoting public understanding and awareness of Armenian issues. The Assembly is a 501(c) (3) tax-exempt membership organization.

    ###


    Editor's Note:

    Complete written testimony of Philip Gordon, Assistant Secretary for Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs at the Department of State.

    Link

    Leave a comment:


  • Sako
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    This is exactly what I wish for in Turkey. There is no such thing as a Turkish race, Turks are mostly the descendants of indigenous converts to Islam, with only slight true Turkic gene influence. Hence why Arab and Kurd decedents, despite being muslim, never identified themselves as Turks after the fall of the Ottoman empire.

    However, this wasn't Ataturk plan for Turkification, he believed all Ottoman descendants who were loyal to his ideology and state, regardless of religion and ethnicity should be labeled as Turks. Kemalism in its original form only defined Turkishness through citizenship.

    I consider xxxish, Greek, or Armenian citizens of Turkey as Turks. However let me stress that this does not mean they have to hide their ethic background, or be ashamed of it. Multi-culturalism should be seen as a strength in modern Turkey.

    Armenian citizens of Turkey helped create the Turkish language.
    So what your saying is that the word TURK should be or is a title? You basically want Turkey to do what America does, am I right? I mean, it's almost the same thing here. There is no such thing as an AMERICAN race. So this is what you want. Interesting. Well, the only problem is that Turkey doesn't think like you do and to top it off, your leaders and fellow Turks make people hide their identity in so many ways. Until that changes, Turkey won't be moving on and neither will anyone else!

    Leave a comment:


  • Federate
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    20 years for Dink murder, 28 years for book about this murder


    More than two years after Agos editor Hrant Dink was shot dead, a reporter stands trial for writing about the circumstances surrounding the murder. For his alleged crimes, he faces 28 years in prison, eight years more than what the murder suspect would serve if convicted.

    Milliyet daily reporter Nedim Şener’s book "Dink Murder and Intelligence Lies" focused on the intelligence deficiencies by security agencies before and after Dink was shot dead, leading to a police officer and three senior Police Department intelligence chiefs filing complaints against him.

    Dink, who was prosecuted for insulting Turkishness, was killed in front of Agos’s office. The chief suspect, a teenage nationalist, is currently on trial along with several alleged accomplices who are accused of influencing the culprit.

    Milliyet daily reported that the complaints have led the Istanbul Prosecutor’s Office to charge Şener with publication of secret information and turning anti-terrorism officials into targets. The reporter faces a maximum prison term of 28 years if found guilty.

    Şener, speaking to Anatolia news agency on his way to the opening hearing yesterday, said he is facing a total of 28 years in prison if convicted in two cases on charges of obtaining classified documents and insulting government officials.

    Şener has two trials pending as a result of the complaints. Yesterday’s trial at the Istanbul Second Court was on violating official secrets. Şener, who faces up to eight years in jail on this charge, defended himself by saying that the information in his book was from phone conversations that were made public on televisions and newspapers months before his book was printed. "These conversations are also on the Internet and can be found when one searches Google," he said.

    Şener said the trial aimed at preventing the public from learning the facts about Dink’s murder and press freedom. He asked the court to find him not guilty. The judge decided to postpone the trial to another date for the defendant’s lawyers to prepare for the prosecutor’s case.

    Milliyet Editor-in-Chief Sedat Ergin told Anatolia news agency his presence at court was to support not only Şener but also press freedom in Turkey. "We are showing this solidarity in order to ensure press freedom in respected," he said. The Turkish Journalists' Association, or TGC, released a statement on the case, seeing it as "worrying" and a problem for democracy, Hurriyet Daily News reported.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sako
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    Really? Or are you just being sarcastic? )

    Leave a comment:


  • hipeter924
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    Originally posted by Saco View Post
    But not every individual Turk ! I'm not talking about Turkey, I'm talking about the Turks themselves. I also agree with you Eddo jan, our enemies are the enemies of the good Turks as well but I've also seen many people confuse the good Turks with bad ones and that I feel is very bad (As if we don't have enough enemies). Why has that happened? Because many people can't control themselves.

    I'm saying this again, we're not talking about Turkey, we're talking about the Turk's themselves.
    Okay I get you now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sako
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    Simply acknowledging the Armenian Genocide doesn't mean you stop being racist, you need more than simply Genocide recognition, but a change of ideas and opinions. It is true there are Turks that recognize the genocide and want a better Turkey that isn't racist or negative to its citizens and its neighbours.

    Unfortunately most Turks are not like that, in the same way that most Germans used to support Hitler or Nazism the Turks have not yet broken free of idol worshipping Ataturk and the "Turkish Republic". Till that happens Turkey as a nation can only be regarded as racist or negative to itself and its neighbours, with dissidents and freedom fighters within that oppose this.
    But not every individual Turk ! I'm not talking about Turkey, I'm talking about the Turks themselves. I also agree with you Eddo jan, our enemies are the enemies of the good Turks as well but I've also seen many people confuse the good Turks with bad ones and that I feel is very bad (As if we don't have enough enemies). Why has that happened? Because many people can't control themselves.

    I'm saying this again, we're not talking about Turkey, we're talking about the Turk's themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • egeli
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    Originally posted by hipeter924 View Post
    Its called Turkey though. I am sure Turkish people even if Turkey recognises the Genocide and becomes a respectful, tolerant and democratic country that people will still want to call themselves Turks...but rather instead of it being a race...it will refer instead to all citizens of that country, like Americans for example call themselves Americans even though it is clear there are several different ethnic groups.
    This is exactly what I wish for in Turkey. There is no such thing as a Turkish race, Turks are mostly the descendants of indigenous converts to Islam, with only slight true Turkic gene influence. Hence why Arab and Kurd decedents, despite being muslim, never identified themselves as Turks after the fall of the Ottoman empire.

    However, this wasn't Ataturk plan for Turkification, he believed all Ottoman descendants who were loyal to his ideology and state, regardless of religion and ethnicity should be labeled as Turks. Kemalism in its original form only defined Turkishness through citizenship.

    I consider xxxish, Greek, or Armenian citizens of Turkey as Turks. However let me stress that this does not mean they have to hide their ethic background, or be ashamed of it. Multi-culturalism should be seen as a strength in modern Turkey.

    Armenian citizens of Turkey helped create the Turkish language.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eddo211
    replied
    Re: Can Turkey Learn Tolerance?

    Originally posted by hipeter924 View Post
    ..........the Turks have not yet broken free of idol worshipping Ataturk and the "Turkish Republic". Till that happens Turkey as a nation can only be regarded as racist or negative to itself and its neighbours, with dissidents and freedom fighters within that oppose this.
    Well said Mate...........Our true enemy is the enemy of a true (good) Turk. But even then we got problems.
    Last edited by Eddo211; 06-10-2009, 05:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X