Originally posted by nakharar
That simply reflects the hypocrite nature of this notorious revisionist. You should see how he behaves on *urkish forums and/or in the company of his *urkish friends.
Also, do you remember his overt and ugly attacks - in Hi4rum - of a member of this forum - who should remain Anonymous - and all the name callings? While, such a coward, he's far more considerate in here. I "wonder" why?

Because he knows that the Anonymous member is not being mobbed in here! That's should say enough about his character.
In any case, in order to gain credibility, revisionists have to criticize *urks to a certain degree - by simply stating facts that both sides more or less accept.
Note: I have chosen to auto censor the words "*urk" or "*urkish" because it is commonly perceived as unpleasant and offending, evokes unpleasant emotions and imagery and is pregnant with immoral and evil connotations!
Comment