Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

Armenia, Azerbaijan `Close To Karabakh Deal'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    West turns a blind eye as activists crushed before Azerbaijan poll

    By Andrew Osborn in Baku
    Published: 05 November 2005
    Briefly the democracy activists of Azerbaijan had dared to dream of an "Orange revolution", but the oil-rich former Soviet republic will contest what were supposed to be the country's first democratic elections tomorrow in an atmosphere of fear.

    The two-month election campaign has seen some of the opposition's most idealistic young campaigners jailed, brutally beaten by police, threatened with torture, cleverly framed and discredited and effectively neutralised as a political force.

    Defiant to the last, they insist they are still on course to capture more votes than the government, but their hopes of replicating the success of campaigners in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan who toppled corruption-sodden Soviet-era regimes look slim.

    The run-up to tomorrow's parliamentary elections was neither free nor fair, and there are serious international concerns about the equity of voting itself. But even if there is a row over falsified elections the democracy activists look ill-equipped to convert any popular discontent into regime change.

    The millionaire Aliyev family dynasty, which has ruled the country with an iron fist for most of the past three decades and has multi-million pound property interests in London, has simply proved too clever and too willing to use force and intimidation.

    Ilham Aliyev, the country's 40-year-old President, took over the mantle of his father, Heidar, in 2003 and has crafted a public image of himself and his regime as a permanent feature of Azeri life. He enjoys good relations with Washington and London, which have major interests in Azerbaijan's new oil pipeline, wields complete control over the broadcast media and has thousands of fiercely loyal riot police at his disposal.

    The Aliyev mark is stamped all over Baku. Statues and billboards featuring the avuncular features and musings of the late Heidar Aliyev, who died in 2003, are everywhere. The cult of personality affords little room for alternative voices.

    The Yeni Fikir (New Thinking) pro-democracy youth movement knows all about the regime's dislike of opposition. Set up last year, it was supposed to be the spearhead of the Orange movement and was the first opposition grouping to make orange, the colour of Ukraine's successful revolution, its own.

    Crafted in the image of similar youth groups in the former Yugoslavia, Georgia and Ukraine, it began to hold noisy rallies. However, today it looks a spent force.

    In August its leader, Ruslan Bashirli, 26, was arrested at his home by men in black masks. He was accused of trying to forcefully overthrow the government and of plotting dissent with security service agents from Armenia, Azerbaijan's sworn enemy.

    The authorities claimed that the Armenian agents had suggested using live gunfire during an opposition rally in order to destabilise the country. America's National Democratic Institute, a non-profit organisation closely aligned to the US Democratic Party, was also accused of complicity in the plot.

    Secret footage of Bashirli's "traitorous meeting" was broadcast on giant public screens in Baku and the young activist was thrown into jail for three months, a stretch that has since been extended to five. His fellow activists say he was framed.

    Other activists have fared little better. Said Nuriyev, another leading light in Yeni Fikir, was arrested soon after Bashirli and is now under house arrest in a Baku hospital where he is recovering from a long-standing blood disorder.

    Attempts to visit him - even by some of his own close family members - have been refused and when his fellow activists tried to see him they were barred from the hospital grounds and beaten by more than 100 baton-wielding policemen.

    The movement's third big hitter, Ramin Tagiev, 26, has also been arrested and has similarly been accused of fomenting violent change. He has been given a three- month prison sentence and his friends and family have found it almost impossible to get news of his well-being.

    Attempts to discredit Yeni Fikir did not end there. On one occasion activists returned to their campaign office to discover a white carrier bag containing four hand grenades and some TNT explosive.

    Ahmad Shahidov, an activist who has not yet been locked up, says he believes it was another attempt to discredit his organisation. "The President was due to make a visit right across the street on the same day. We think they wanted to accuse us of wanting to kill the President."

    With local and foreign media looking on, the activists eventually got the police to take the explosives off their hands.

    Human Rights Watch says another activist, Sarvan Sarhanov, was detained by the police for six hours during which time they urged him to go on television to make a statement denouncing the movement. They brought a pair of pliers into the interrogation room and threatened to use them on his hands, but he did not comply and was eventually freed.

    "These guys were just young people who had had enough of living in a country where everything in their lives was controlled by one family," Murad Gassanly, an activist for the opposition Freedom Bloc told The Independent.

    "What happened to them shows what you get here if you become politically active. Anything against the regime carries serious repercussions."

    The mainstream opposition has not been allowed to hold rallies in central Baku, or to put up its posters in many areas. It has been starved of all important air time and many of its rallies have ended with demonstrators being rushed to hospital after police beatings.

    The opposition estimates that 1,500 activists have been detained since 5 September, 2,000 injured, 400 arrested and held for over a month, and 200 sentenced. Thirty prospective parliamentary candidates have also detained or beaten up.

    Mr Aliyev has dismissed opposition criticism out of hand. He says that tomorrow's elections will be free and fair and that there is no need for a velvet revolution.

    Last-minute concessions such as marking voters' hands with invisible ink and allowing exit polls mean, he insists, that the elections will be the country's freest yet.

    America is watching closely and while Washington concedes that things could be better, the consensus seems to be that Mr Aliyev, the custodian of the Caspian Sea's oil riches, is a man they can do business with. Azerbaijan's border with Iran means, analysts say, that for America, stability is paramount.

    History of a dynasty

    * 1993: Heydar Aliyev declares himself President.

    * 1994: Three members of special police force arrested after assassinations of deputy head of parliament and Aliyev's security chief. Later in the year, Azerbaijan signs contract with oil companies for use of three oil fields.

    * 1995: Aliyev's New Azerbaijan Party wins election alleged to contravene international standards.

    * 1998: Opposition activists arrested at protests against elections.

    * 2001: Azerbaijan becomes full member of Council of Europe.

    * 2002: Work starts on pipeline to carry oil from Azerbaijan to Turkey.

    * 2003: Aliyev appoints son Ilham as Prime Minister. Three people killed in opposition demonstrations. In December, Aliyev dies in US hospital, aged 80.

    * 2005: Oil starts flowing through pipeline. Police use force to break up opposition demonstrations in Baku before elections.

    Briefly the democracy activists of Azerbaijan had dared to dream of an "Orange revolution", but the oil-rich former Soviet republic will contest what were supposed to be the country's first democratic elections tomorrow in an atmosphere of fear.

    The two-month election campaign has seen some of the opposition's most idealistic young campaigners jailed, brutally beaten by police, threatened with torture, cleverly framed and discredited and effectively neutralised as a political force.

    Defiant to the last, they insist they are still on course to capture more votes than the government, but their hopes of replicating the success of campaigners in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan who toppled corruption-sodden Soviet-era regimes look slim.

    The run-up to tomorrow's parliamentary elections was neither free nor fair, and there are serious international concerns about the equity of voting itself. But even if there is a row over falsified elections the democracy activists look ill-equipped to convert any popular discontent into regime change.

    The millionaire Aliyev family dynasty, which has ruled the country with an iron fist for most of the past three decades and has multi-million pound property interests in London, has simply proved too clever and too willing to use force and intimidation.

    Ilham Aliyev, the country's 40-year-old President, took over the mantle of his father, Heidar, in 2003 and has crafted a public image of himself and his regime as a permanent feature of Azeri life. He enjoys good relations with Washington and London, which have major interests in Azerbaijan's new oil pipeline, wields complete control over the broadcast media and has thousands of fiercely loyal riot police at his disposal.

    The Aliyev mark is stamped all over Baku. Statues and billboards featuring the avuncular features and musings of the late Heidar Aliyev, who died in 2003, are everywhere. The cult of personality affords little room for alternative voices.

    The Yeni Fikir (New Thinking) pro-democracy youth movement knows all about the regime's dislike of opposition. Set up last year, it was supposed to be the spearhead of the Orange movement and was the first opposition grouping to make orange, the colour of Ukraine's successful revolution, its own.

    Crafted in the image of similar youth groups in the former Yugoslavia, Georgia and Ukraine, it began to hold noisy rallies. However, today it looks a spent force.

    In August its leader, Ruslan Bashirli, 26, was arrested at his home by men in black masks. He was accused of trying to forcefully overthrow the government and of plotting dissent with security service agents from Armenia, Azerbaijan's sworn enemy.

    The authorities claimed that the Armenian agents had suggested using live gunfire during an opposition rally in order to destabilise the country. America's National Democratic Institute, a non-profit organisation closely aligned to the US Democratic Party, was also accused of complicity in the plot.

    Secret footage of Bashirli's "traitorous meeting" was broadcast on giant public screens in Baku and the young activist was thrown into jail for three months, a stretch that has since been extended to five. His fellow activists say he was framed.

    Other activists have fared little better. Said Nuriyev, another leading light in Yeni Fikir, was arrested soon after Bashirli and is now under house arrest in a Baku hospital where he is recovering from a long-standing blood disorder.

    Attempts to visit him - even by some of his own close family members - have been refused and when his fellow activists tried to see him they were barred from the hospital grounds and beaten by more than 100 baton-wielding policemen.

    The movement's third big hitter, Ramin Tagiev, 26, has also been arrested and has similarly been accused of fomenting violent change. He has been given a three- month prison sentence and his friends and family have found it almost impossible to get news of his well-being.
    Attempts to discredit Yeni Fikir did not end there. On one occasion activists returned to their campaign office to discover a white carrier bag containing four hand grenades and some TNT explosive.

    Ahmad Shahidov, an activist who has not yet been locked up, says he believes it was another attempt to discredit his organisation. "The President was due to make a visit right across the street on the same day. We think they wanted to accuse us of wanting to kill the President."

    With local and foreign media looking on, the activists eventually got the police to take the explosives off their hands.

    Human Rights Watch says another activist, Sarvan Sarhanov, was detained by the police for six hours during which time they urged him to go on television to make a statement denouncing the movement. They brought a pair of pliers into the interrogation room and threatened to use them on his hands, but he did not comply and was eventually freed.

    "These guys were just young people who had had enough of living in a country where everything in their lives was controlled by one family," Murad Gassanly, an activist for the opposition Freedom Bloc told The Independent.

    "What happened to them shows what you get here if you become politically active. Anything against the regime carries serious repercussions."

    The mainstream opposition has not been allowed to hold rallies in central Baku, or to put up its posters in many areas. It has been starved of all important air time and many of its rallies have ended with demonstrators being rushed to hospital after police beatings.

    The opposition estimates that 1,500 activists have been detained since 5 September, 2,000 injured, 400 arrested and held for over a month, and 200 sentenced. Thirty prospective parliamentary candidates have also detained or beaten up.

    Mr Aliyev has dismissed opposition criticism out of hand. He says that tomorrow's elections will be free and fair and that there is no need for a velvet revolution.

    Last-minute concessions such as marking voters' hands with invisible ink and allowing exit polls mean, he insists, that the elections will be the country's freest yet.

    America is watching closely and while Washington concedes that things could be better, the consensus seems to be that Mr Aliyev, the custodian of the Caspian Sea's oil riches, is a man they can do business with. Azerbaijan's border with Iran means, analysts say, that for America, stability is paramount.
    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

    Comment


    • #92
      Official in Karabakh denies ethnic Armenians' part in Azeri poll

      Official in Karabakh denies ethnic Armenians' part in Azeri poll

      Regnum, Moscow
      6 Nov 05

      An aide to the president of [separatist Azerbaijani region of]
      Nagornyy Karabakh, David Babayan, has dismissed as "absurd" the
      reports in the Azerbaijani media alleging that the Central Electoral
      Commission [CEC] "has received appeals from some Azerbaijani citizens
      of Armenian origin" about their participation in the parliamentary
      election in Azerbaijan.

      "Such statements cannot be true and the very idea of sending such
      appeals to the Azerbaijani CEC is absurd. I think that such steps are
      aimed at improving the rating of the pro-government forces before the
      election, which is, by the way, the violation of the electoral law
      because any propaganda is prohibited on the eve of the poll. Against a
      background of the massive 'witch hunt' in Baku, the authors of this
      idea aim to ease the situation, which does not bring credit to the
      authorities. Even if we admit that such appeals do exist, they must
      have been signed by those Armenians who have stayed in mixed marriages
      in Azerbaijan or prisoners of war or hostages from Karabakh who
      continue to be held in Azerbaijani jails and whose existence is
      carefully concealed," the aide said

      Comment


      • #93
        Oskanian And Mamedyarov To Meet In Ljubljana

        Armenpress
        Nov 10 2005

        BAKU, NOVEMBER 10, ARMENPRESS: Azerbaijani foreign affairs minister
        Elmar Mamedyarov told journalists in Baku today that Armenia and
        Azerbaijan are going to intensify their efforts for the resolution of
        the Karabakh conflict beginning next year. Mamedyarov said Armenia and
        Azerbaijan have agreed on another meeting of their foreign ministers
        in Ljubljana on 4-5 December 2005, but added that the format of the
        talks is still to be determined.
        "All truth passes through three stages:
        First, it is ridiculed;
        Second, it is violently opposed; and
        Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

        Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

        Comment


        • #94
          Azeri Karate Team Banned after Incident with Armenian Athletes in Limassol

          NICOSIA (Gibrahayer)--Azerbaijan's National Karate was banned from participating in all official games of the World Karate Federation for one year, following an incident between the Azeri and Armenian teams, in which an Armenian athlete was rushed to the hospital with a broken tooth.

          The World Karate Federation Committee decided on the ban last weekend after concluding an Azeri athlete provoked the scuffle between the two teams at the opening ceremony of the Fourth World Youth Karate Games in Limassol, Cyprus. Both teams were not allowed to participate in the opening ceremony.

          The official one-year ban will be announced within the next couple of days.

          Đ 2005 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.
          ASBAREZ provides this news service for academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through mass media outlets.
          URL:www.asbarez.com
          "All truth passes through three stages:
          First, it is ridiculed;
          Second, it is violently opposed; and
          Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

          Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

          Comment


          • #95
            Valance Recognizes Independence Of Nkr. Ghoukasyan Visits France

            DeFacto Agency, Armenia
            Nov 15 2005

            Nagorno Karabakh Republic President Arkady Ghoukasyan visited Paris,
            Nice, Bur - le - Valance and Valance within the frames of his visit
            to France November 12-14.

            According to the information De Facto got at the NKR Permanent
            Representation in France, on November 12 Arkady Ghoukasyan met French
            Parliament deputy, Deputy Chair of Armenia - France Friendship Group
            Muriel Marlin - Militellou in Nice. On the interlocutor's request NKR
            President presented the NKR stand on the settlement of the conflict
            with Azerbaijan and acquainted the French Parliamentarian with the
            amendments being implemented in Artsakh. Deputy Chair of Armenia -
            France Friendship Group expressed assurance that positive shifts
            taking place in NKR were in the focus of the European structures
            attention having added the process would have a positive influence
            on the final solution of the problem.

            The same day NKR President met first Deputy President of the Regional
            Council of Alp Cote d'Azur of Provance Patrick Alleman. At the
            meeting Arkady Ghoukasyan presented the course of Artsakh socio -
            economic development having stressed the importance of the role of
            the Armenian Diaspora and NKR foreign friends in the process.

            After that Arkady Ghoukasyan met representatives of the local Armenian
            Diaspora at the Basramyan Cultural Center in Nice. The meeting was
            held within the frames of the TV marathon, which is to be conducted by
            Hayastan Pan Armenian Foundation in France on November 17-20. Arkady
            Ghoukasyan emphasized economic, social, psychological, educational
            and cultural significance of the TV marathon for Artsakh people.

            On November 13 NKR President visited the town of Bur - le - Valance,
            where he participated in the ceremony of opening of the monument to
            the victims of the Armenian Genocide in Osmanian Turkey at early XX
            century. In the course of the ceremony Mayor - Senator of the town,
            Chairman of the Senate Armenia - France friendship group Bernard Piras
            presented Arkady Ghoukasyan with the emblem of Bur - le - Valance.

            Then Arkady Ghoukasyan and Bernard Piras dialogued. Mayor of Bur - le
            - Valance took an interest in the perspective of the Nagorno Karabakh
            conflict settlement. Answering the questions NKR President noted the
            importance of French diplomacy efforts in the issue.

            After the meeting with Mayor of Bur - le - Valance Arkady Ghoukasyan
            participated in the reception organized by Mayor of Valance Lena
            Baslan. She stated the town of Valance recognized the independence
            of Nagorno Karabakh Republic. Then Arkady Ghoukasyan was presented
            with the emblem of Valance.

            The same day, in the evening, NKR President visited the Valance Center
            of Armenian Culture, where he familiarized himself with the activity
            of the Center. After that Arkady Ghoukasyan met representatives of
            the regional mass media.

            Later NKR President took part in the reception organized within
            the frames of the TV marathon, which is to be held in France. Arkady
            Ghoukasyan stressed the importance of realization of the NKR Martakert
            region development program in 2005-2006 in the context of the Karabakh
            state socio - economic development.

            In the course of the visit NKR President was accompanied by the NKR
            Permanent Representative in France Hovhannes Gevorgyan and Executive
            Director of Hayastan Pan Armenian Foundation Naira Melkumyan.

            Gavur--Well its a start!
            "All truth passes through three stages:
            First, it is ridiculed;
            Second, it is violently opposed; and
            Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

            Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

            Comment


            • #96
              ALIZADE: "AZERBAIJAN WILL BE DEPRIVED OF SUFFRAGE AT PACE AND PROCESS OF RECOGNITION

              ALIZADE: "AZERBAIJAN WILL BE DEPRIVED OF SUFFRAGE AT PACE AND PROCESS OF RECOGNITION OF NK MAY BEGIN"

              DeFacto News Agency, Armenia
              Nov 16 2005

              "Azerbaijan will be deprived of the suffrage at the PACE and the
              process of recognition of Nagorno Karabakh will begin", stated one of
              the leaders of YeS opposition bloc, AR Socio - Democratic Party leader
              Araz Alizade speaking about possible falsifications of Parliamentary
              elections conducted on November 6.

              Mentioning total falsifications in the course of the elections Araz
              Alizade expressed assurance that the international structures would
              apply sanctions against Azerbaijan. "PACE will deprive our country
              of suffrage, OSCE will do the same. However, the most awful is that
              the process of recognition of Nagorno Karabakh may begin. The thing is
              that the international organizations state if the rights of Azeris are
              violated in Azerbaijan no one can guarantee the rights of Armenians
              will not be violated in our country", noted Socio - Democratic Party
              leader, the Baku - based Echo newspaper reports.

              Comment


              • #97
                Armenian Ministry Denies Azerbaijani Report Of Truce Violation

                Arminfo
                17 Nov 05

                Yerevan, 17 November: Not a single shot has recently been fired
                from the Armenian side on the contact line with the Azerbaijani
                armed forces, the deputy chief of the Armenian General Staff,
                Major Enriko Apriamov, has told our correspondent in a telephone
                conversation. Commenting on a report in the Azerbaijani media about
                an alleged cease-fire violation, he said that this report was an
                another fiction.
                "All truth passes through three stages:
                First, it is ridiculed;
                Second, it is violently opposed; and
                Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                Comment


                • #98
                  Nk Hasn't Been Mentioned As A Part Azerbaijan

                  Aravot.am-ը առցանց լրատվական կայք է, որտեղ կգտնեք թարմ նորություններ Հայաստանից:

                  Hranoush Hakobian who led the delegation of Armenia in the Parliamentary Assembly of NATO told in the press interview yesterday that there were negative positions for Armenia in the project of resolution adopted in the Congress on "Defense and Integration of Minority as a Support of Stability in South-Caucasus". In particularly the word "Azerbaijan" was mentioned near the name of Nagorno Karabakh. The Armenian delegation succeeded in basing the inadmissibility of such attachment in the sitting of the commission of civil expansion of Security at Parliamentary Assembly. And though the opposition from the Azerbaijani and Georgian delegates the part of Armenian side has been adopted.
                  "All truth passes through three stages:
                  First, it is ridiculed;
                  Second, it is violently opposed; and
                  Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                  Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Kosovo And Nagorno Karabakh: Different Conflicts But Similar Solutions?

                    Sunday, November 20, 2005 : MEDIAMAX News Agency

                    18.11.05. At the first glance, there is no direct correlation between the expected intensification of the Nagorno Karabakh peace process and upcoming talks for the determination of Kosovo status. The fact that the beginning of these two processes may be expected in January 2006 is certainly a simple coincidence. However, the talks on the future status of Kosovo, their outcome as well as conditions faced by Belgrade in the context of these talks, may conceptually affect both the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement and the future development of relations between South Caucasus countries and NATO.

                    Armenian leaders began to draw some parallels between Kosovo and Nagorno Karabakh after NATO had finished its military operation and the Serbian troops had left the region. In summer 1999, Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said he didn`t understand Azerbaijan`s frequent statements urging to attract NATO to the Karabakh conflict settlement.

                    Armenian Foreign Minster noted then that `if we speak about parallels between Karabakh and Kosovo and NATO`s possible participation, the hypothetical involvement of the Alliance must be in favor of Armenia, not Azerbaijan`. `The parallels between Kosovo and Karabakh may be drawn at the level of 1992 and 1993, when Azerbaijan actually denied the autonomy of Karabakh like Milosevic did in Kosovo trying to resolve the problem through military force,` Oskanian stated. He said that Azerbaijan tried to resolve the Karabakh problem by means of ethnic cleansings, when the Azeri army moved to Shahumian and Martakert `cleaning` the territory from the Armenian population.

                    `The situation is similar, but there is an essential difference between Kosovo and Karabakh: our liberation army was much stronger. We could withstand ethnic cleansings and had done what NATO is trying to do now in Kosovo,` Vartan Oskanian said then.

                    The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR) voiced the same position. `In Bosnia and Herzegovina the truce was reached under compulsion of the world community. We reached truce without the world community, by incredible efforts,` NKR President Arkady Ghukasian said in 1999.

                    In the course of time, official Yerevan admitted the possibility that the approaches to the resolution of these two conflicts, despite their different roots and history, may have something in common. Summing up the session of the OSCE Foreign Ministerial Council in Vienna in November 2000, Armenian Foreign Minster said in the interview to Mediamax that it was necessary to use new institutional approaches to settle the existing conflicts. The Minister said that Kosovo put forward demands on its independence and Belgrade favoured the preservation of its territorial integrity. `In this respect we must find political and judicial solution, giving it institutional character`, Armenian Foreign Minister stressed, noting that `the precedent already exists - the proposal with the concept of a Common State, put forward by the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs in 1998 but denied by Azerbaijan. The Minister pointed out then that the `Common state` was a `unique attempt for compromise`, accommodating two fundamental international principles: the countries` territorial integrity and the peoples` right for self-determination.

                    Nevertheless, Azerbaijan denied not only the concept of the Common State but also new agreements reached in 2001 in Paris and Key West.

                    Curiously that in August 2001, when it became known that Azeri President Heydar Aliyev denied the peace agreement worked out in Key West, Foreign Minister of Armenia Vartan Oskanian met with the Head of the Democratic League of Kosovo, Ibrahim Rugovā. Oskanian and Rugova certainly focused on issues connected with the future status of Kosovo and Nagorno Karabakh.

                    Interviewed by Suddeutsche Zeitung quite recently, Vartan Oskanian said that `the recognition of Kosovo`s independence would be a politically positive sign for the Armenians of Karabakh.` It`s hard to argue this s tatement. On the other hand, it is necessary to understand the objectives of the international mediators, who admit the possibility of proclamation of Kosovo independence, and how frank they are.

                    At first glance, everything develops quite well for the Armenian side. The advocates of this viewpoint remember the address of the OSCE Chairman-in-office, Slovenian Foreign Minister Dimitrij Rupel at the UN Security Council in New York this March, when he described Nagorno Karabakh as a `disputed territory.`

                    OSCE Chairman-in-office particularly said that `in parts of the Republic of Moldova, Georgia and in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, the OSCE is actively trying to resolve conflicts that were sometimes referred to as frozen, but which lately have started to thaw`. Speaking about the conflict settlement on the whole, OSCE Chairman-in-office noted that the case of Kosovo highlighted the question of `reconciling` the desire for self-determination with the issue of preserving the territorial integrity of States.`

                    Rupel`s words were indeed inspiring. But we should not forget that the post of the OSCE Chairman-in-office is very symbolic and Dimitrij Rupel `winkled` everything from his chairmanship in order to increase the international prestige of Slovenia. Such statements, certainly, create a favorable background for the Armenian side, though important decisions are made not in Ljubljana but in Washington and Moscow.

                    This week, U.S. and Russian senior officials spoke of their countries` attitude towards the upcoming Kosovo status negotiations. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who visited Belgrade on November 7, said the following in reply to the question about Moscow`s attitude towards dividing Kosovo into Serbian and Albanian parts:

                    `The governing principles that were approved by the Contact Group say that there may be practically any final decision on the status of Kosovo, but there are several restrictions, like the inadmissibility of dividing Kosovo or changing the borders of the states that are adjacent to Serbia and Montenegro. At any rate an agreement must be reached between Pristina and Belgrade.`

                    Speaking with the journalists on November 8, U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns reiterated Lavrov`s words:

                    `That`s the position of the Contact Group and has been for six and a half years: there shall be no change in the internationally recognized borders of any of the states in the region and certainly no change to the borders of Kosovo itself. That is a different question than whether Kosovo remains as an autonomous province of Serbia and Montenegro or whether it become independent.`

                    In the interview published in Serbian `Politika` newspaper on November 7, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said that `just like our international partners in settlement, we proceed from the assumption that the outcome of the status negotiations is far from predetermined`.

                    `It is a different matter that the Albanian Kosovo politicians nurture the illusion that Kosovo`s independence cannot be questioned. But this is just an opinion of one of the parties. We in the Contact Group and the Security Council say that there are many options for a possible solution,` the Russian Minister stated.

                    Nicholas Burns has also stated that USA admits the possibility of any of two options framed by UN Secretary General Kofi Annan: either independence or continued and greater autonomy of Kosovo within Serbia and Montenegro.

                    `We believe that the proper way to resolve this is to have the parties to the conflict make this decision as to what their future is and then we`ll support that outcome - if it`s a credible outcome, obviously.

                    And that`s an important principle that we not try to chart the future of these negotiations before they start,` U.S. Under Secretary of State stressed.

                    Nicholas Burns, who was speaking to the journalists after his speech o n Kosovo problem in the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, has repeatedly made it clear that the prospects of membership of Serbia and Montenegro in NATO greatly depend on Kosovo status negotiations.

                    `I don`t think anyone would take a country into NATO that had a major territorial dispute within it, in the heart of it, that had not resolved this huge question of the future of Kosovo. I don`t think there`s any possibility of that happening,` the U.S. official stated.

                    Addressing the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Nicholas Burs made another interesting statement, saying: `Talking to Kosovars I made clear to them that the independence must be earned.`

                    `If there is to be an independent state - and I don`t know if there will be or not - then the people who would run that, the Kosovar Albanians and the Kosovar Serbs, need to demonstrate that they could manage the affairs adequately, that they have sufficient political unity, that they respect minority rights, that they would respect democratic freedoms - all the other principles that are embedded in the guiding principles which we have sent to the parties at the start of these talks.`

                    Making a hypothetical assumption that the Kosovo status negotiations will entail consequences for the Nagorno Karabakh peace process, we may assume that almost everything said by Lavrov and Nicholas Burns this week may be applied in our region.

                    Today, almost no one conceals that the settlement variant currently discussed by Armenia and Azerbaijan is based on the issue of holding a referendum on Nagorno Karabakh for the determination of the status of this region. On October 10, the International Crisis Group (ICG) published a new report on the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, and suggested that the final status of Nagorno Karabakh should be determined at a self-determination referendum. The ICG suggested giving Nagorno-Karabakh an `appropriate range of options, including unity with, and secession from Azerbaijan.`

                    It`s early to speak about the issue to be put on a referendum, but it seems to envisage two options: independence or broad autonomy within Azerbaijan. This means that the principle of inadmissibility of changing the borders of neighbouring countries, supported by the USA, Russia and their partners in the Balkans, may be also applied to Nagorno Karabakh. But the proclamation of Kosovo`s independence, which Russia and USA do not rule out, will seriously shake Ilham Aliyev`s arguable thesis that the Armenian side`s reference to the people`s right for self determination is unconvincing, `as the Armenians live in many countries of the world and just imagine what will happen if they demand self-determination in all these countries.`

                    As for linking the issue of membership of Serbia and Montenegro in NATO with the Kosovo peace process, here too we find parallels with the South Caucasus which may become more obvious for Armenia and Azerbaijan in the long-term perspective. Roughly speaking, although Yerevan has never voiced its desire to join NATO and Baku has avoided this topic for past 2 or 3 years, Armenia and Azerbaijan will be most likely persuaded to resolve the Karabakh problem by `tempting` with NATO membership. This foresees a speedy approach to the conflict settlement, and the recent strides of the Georgian leadership prove it. If a year ago Mikhail Saakashvili proposed a 3-year settlement plan for South Ossetian conflict, today this plan suggests implementing it within a year. The plan has been fully approved by the USA and the latter will, most likely, become the full member of the negotiation framework.

                    When asked about whether Georgia can join NATO before settling the conflicts on its territory, Foreign Minister of Georgia Gela Bejuashvili said that `nobody puts the question this way but `everyone thinks about it and we understand this.` `We are determined to explain to our partners that linking Georgia`s accession to NATO with the conflict resolution p lays into the hands of those who don`t want Georgia to join the Alliance,` Georgian FM concluded.

                    Thus, we have another coincidence - South Caucasus countries are told not to dream about membership in NATO before settling existing conflicts. Is it good or bad? There is no unanimous answer to this question. But it is obvious that the settlement processes quicken and Armenian President Robert Kocharian said this directly on November 10:

                    `The mediators are expected to visit the region in December. The mediators urge the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan to meet in January 2006. They hurry taking into consideration the fact that parliamentary and presidential elections are to be held in Armenia in

                    2007 and 2008. The elections Azerbaijan have already passed. This means that the year 2006 is free from election tensions and we may work actively,` said the President.

                    Nicholas Burns was right saying that `independence has to be earned.` Nagorno Karabakh has earned its independence not only during the war but also during next 11 peaceful years, when it built a normal statehood and did not become a `black whole` like Transdniestria, South Ossetia or Kosovo.

                    There are numerous reasons why it is tactless, even senseless, to draw parallels between peace processes in Kosovo and Nagorno Karabakh.

                    However, we should understand that the approaches of the international community, despite the geographic, ethnic, geo-political or other aspects and peculiarities, on the whole bear a uniform character and are based on the precedent. The first precedent was the Eastern Timor, and Kosovo might be the second one. Nagorno Karabakh can become the third precedent if Azerbaijan finds strength to agree with such outcome and the international community admits without hypocrisy that Nagorno Karabakh has indeed earned this independence.

                    MEDIAMAX News Agency
                    2005-11-18 11:37:00
                    "All truth passes through three stages:
                    First, it is ridiculed;
                    Second, it is violently opposed; and
                    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)

                    Comment


                    • Armenia Highly Appreciates Slovenia's Efforts Made In Osce For

                      ARMENIA HIGHLY APPRECIATES SLOVENIA'S EFFORTS MADE IN OSCE FOR
                      ARKA News Agency, Armenia

                      Nov 18 2005



                      YEREVAN, November 18. /ARKA/. Armenia highly appreciates Slovenia's
                      efforts made in OSCE for Karabakh conflict settlement. Armenian
                      President's press service sent to ARKA News Agency said Armenia is
                      also welcoming Slovenia's attention to South Caucasus region. As an
                      example of this attention, the press release singled out two visits
                      by Dmirti Rupel, Slovenian Foreign Minister and OSCE
                      Chairman-in-Office, to Armenia and South Caucasus regions in April
                      and September 2005.
                      Slovenia is holding OSCE Chairmanship now. M.V. -0--

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X