Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!

2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.

8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

On Bruises, Beauties, and Makeup

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Where beast meets West

    The Sunday Times May 14, 2006


    On the tourist beaches of Turkey, young women flirt and frolic — but go further inland, and a mere glance in the direction of a man can mean death. As Turkey edges towards membership of Europe and western equal rights, Christine Toomey reports on the violent clash of East and West, and the deadly social divide it is leaving in its wake

    The room the father ushers me into is small and bare. In one corner stands a tall wooden wardrobe; in another, a television concealed beneath an embroidered cloth. The floor is covered with a carpet that is ragged but clean. It must have taken his wife many hours to wash it of their daughter’s blood. For an hour before the father arrives home, his wife has been describing events on the morning 14-year-old Berruan died. As difficult as it is to comprehend any such death, the more she talks about what happened, the less what she says makes sense.

    Snow lay thick on the ground that day last January. Her husband and 15-year-old son had left the house. She was tending to domestic chores outside when she heard a gunshot. She immediately thought it must be a hunter shooting birds, she says. “But then my little boy ran outside screaming, ‘Come quickly! Come quickly! My sister has killed herself!’”

    The mother ran inside and saw her daughter’s body lying on the floor of the cramped room that the father later shows me. “At first I thought she must have fallen and hit her head. But then I saw the gun. There was no reason for her to do that,” Berruan’s mother insists. “She was so happy with us. She had no problems – no problems at all.”

    As she talks, we sit on the doorstep of the family’s dilapidated home in a small village near Batman in Turkey’s southeastern Anatolia. This area has become notorious in recent years for the high number of suicides, particularly of girls and young women whose despair is said to stem from their severely restricted lives. But women’s groups and human-rights workers believe a more sinister explanation lies behind many of the deaths. They’re convinced a growing number of girls and women are being locked in rooms by their families, with a gun, poison or a noose, and left there until they kill themselves.

    Such deaths are referred to here as “forced suicides” – murder by any other name. Whether Berruan was one of those pressured by her family to take her own life is impossible to know. But such suspicion now surrounds any such death in the community that, shortly after she died, one local Batman newspaper reporting her death carried the headline “Was it suicide or murder?”

    Yet those who expose domestic violence risk being rapidly silenced in this country. In recent months, three national TV talk shows have been pulled off the air after two women appearing as guests were shot shortly afterwards – one by her son, another by her husband – for denouncing domestic abuse and so “tainting” their family’s honour. Turkey is not a country where the concept of free expression has as yet sunk deep. Those in the media who touch on other subjects considered too sensitive also risk breaking the law – 33 journalists and writers currently face trial on charges of “insulting Turkey’s national character”. For, as far as many are concerned, Turkey is a country on a knife edge.

    That this vast, mainly Muslim country of 71m is where East meets – and often clashes violently with – West, has become a hoary adage. But rarely since Kemal Ataturk founded this republic in the ashes of the Ottoman empire in 1923 and ordered it to “face west” has this been truer than now. As the country battles to balance its aspirations to continue to modernise, and so improve its chance of becoming a member of the EU, with the desire of many to maintain conservative and often religious tradition, many subjects are thought best swept under the carpet. In recent years it has been Turkish women who have been at the forefront of this battle.

    As Berruan’s mother speaks, her grandmother kneels close by and mutters: “It was her destiny.” Berruan’s mother nods. “What can you do if God writes on your forehead that it is time to die?” When I ask them to describe what sort of girl Berruan was, they use words like “beautiful”, “strong” and “fearless”. They say she did well at school until she left when she was 11, as most girls in this area do – if they go to school at all.

    They insist again and again that she was “a good girl” who “never cast her eyes outside the home”. But to be born strong-willed or beautiful or clever can be a curse for a girl in parts of Turkey such as this. To attract attention can be a death sentence. Once the words “adi cikmis” – translated roughly as “her name is known” or “she has become notorious” – are uttered, the girl or woman of whom they are said stands little chance of survival. A “family council”, or kangaroo court, is convened at which it is decided how she who is “notorious” should die. Such ritualised deaths are deemed by those responsible to be an “honour killing” – a deadly oxymoron meaning her behaviour has offended the “namus”, or honour, of male members of the family. Only by killing her, they believe, can the family’s honour be restored and its “slate be cleaned”.

    Turkey is not, of course, the only country where honour killings take place. The United Nations states – and it is believed to be a great underestimate – that more than 5,000 women are killed across the world every year by relatives who accuse them of bringing shame on their families. The majority occur in the Middle East. But British police are currently investigating more than a hundred such suspected crimes among minority communities in this country. In Turkey over the past six years, an average of one or two women have died every week owing to honour killings and blood feuds. According to a recent Turkish police report, the true figure is believed to be three or four times higher.

    Such wholesale blood-letting, believed by many to be on the increase, appears to be of little concern to more than a third of the population. A Turkish parliamentary commission set up last year to investigate honour killings found that 37% of those surveyed thought a woman should be killed for committing adultery, while many others supported punishments such as facial disfigurement, with 64% thinking the husband should be the one to carry out such punishments.

    In communities such as Batman, and where Berruan died, it is enough for a girl to glance for a few seconds too long where men are gathered to cause lethal offence. Or to request a love song on the radio, or wear jeans, or a skirt that is a little too short. Or, however unwittingly, to catch the eye of boy or man who then flirts with, seduces or rapes her. Death sentences have been imposed here on daughters, wives and sisters for all of the above. The “guilty” have been shot, strangled, stoned, had their throats slit or been buried alive.

    Nobody in the small village will say if young Berruan’s “name became known”. But this is not a place where strangers are welcome. Life here, as in many other rural areas of Turkey, is run along feudal lines little changed for centuries. It is also a predominantly Kurdish area and the heartland of the Kurdish separatist PKK guerrilla movement. Berruan’s father, he later mentions in passing, was imprisoned for 10 years as a terrorist. So, as a foreign woman asking awkward questions, my presence on his doorstep triggers alarm.

    “What are they doing here?” he shouts at his wife when he returns to find my male interpreter and I in front of the family home. For us to have gone inside would have exposed his wife to the risk of being “talked about”; only he is permitted to show us into the three-room dwelling, which he does, eventually, to point to the room where his daughter died. He eyes us suspiciously, but then decides to adopt a more conciliatory stance. He eventually takes pictures of his daughter as a young girl from his pocket. “How sweet she was then,” he says. “She used to talk about wanting to join the police and even about becoming a lawyer. I told her, ‘You are free to do what you want.’ But then she decided to stay at home, watch television, help with the cleaning,” he says. “Maybe it was from the cleaning that she learnt that I kept my gun on top of the wardrobe.”

    When I ask if he has any recent photographs of his daughter, he says every trace of her has been removed from the house. “We put everything that could remind us of her in a bag, including her Koran, and gave it to the poor.” When I ask his reaction to the newspaper headline raising questions about her death, he swats the air with his hand, as if batting a fly. The interview comes to a swift conclusion after that.

    During the past five years, 281 girls and women have attempted suicide in Batman (population approximately 250,000) – three times the number of attempts by men – and 43 succeeded, the youngest being a 12-year-old girl. “Every suicide of a girl or woman should be looked at with suspicious eyes,” argues Nebahat Akkoc, the director of a women’s support organisation called Ka-Mer in the southeastern city of Diyarbakir. Just how many suicides are “forced”, Akkoc and other human-rights workers admit, is impossible to say. “One girl who survived told us how her family stood watching as she cut her wrists. They then silently closed the door on her and walked away.” Akkoc also talks of other survivors, who have made it to the shelter her organisation runs, describing how their families have told them: “You are going to die anyway, so why let your brother go to prison for killing you? Why not do it yourself?”

    In the twisted minds of those who would force a wife, daughter or sister to end her own life, there is a lethal logic. Tragically, it has to do with EU demands for Turkey to improve its record on human rights if it is to stand a chance of being admitted as a member in the next 10 years. (Accession talks formally began in October 2005.) In response to EU demands to crack down on the widespread problem of honour killings in Turkey, punishments for such crimes have been increased. In the past a male relative could argue he had been “provoked” into killing a female relative because she had offended family honour. This would be enough to diminish the severity of his sentence to little more than a small fine or short prison sentence or, in the case of a minor, usually a matter of a few months – a legal get-out that often resulted in a young brother or cousin being ordered by his family to become the one to carry out the murder. But since Turkey reformed its penal code in the past two years, minors are no longer entitled to a reduction in sentence for committing such crimes. The conditions under which “provocation” can be entered as a plea in mitigation have also been severely reduced – though not abolished entirely. On March 3, for instance, a brother convicted of killing his sister by stoning her in a small community near Diyarbakir had his sentence of life imprisonment reduced to 13 years on the grounds that he had been “provoked”. His sister, Semse Allak, had been raped by one of her father’s friends. It took Semse months to die of her injuries. Her family refused to give her a burial; her body was claimed and buried by a women’s organisation.

    That those who give voice to women, exposing such atrocities, together with those who dare to speak out on other subjects long considered taboo in Turkey, should be silenced, both by the state and private enterprise, is a damning condemnation of a modern democracy.

    Ayse Ozgun drinks coffee in an elegant Istanbul restaurant as she rages against the cancellation of her TV programme Every Day last year.

    “There is a volcano of women’s screams building up in this country, and we were one of the only ways this pent-up anger could be vented,” says Ozgun. “They’ve pulled the shows that looked at the serious problems women face in our society and replaced them with a lot of music and dancing. Ha! Much easier,” she laughs bitterly.

    Ozgun says she was warned more than 20 years ago, when she was the first to host a talk show aimed at women, that her job was to “entertain, not educate”. After just three months the state TV show, considered too controversial, was cancelled. After four years abroad, Ozgun moved back to Turkey and began hosting her new show, Every Day – again aimed at a largely female audience – this time on a private channel. But following a lengthy run, this show was again cancelled in November, after a woman who appeared on the show to discuss how her family had forced her into a marriage was shot dead by her father. “You’ve ruined the reputation and honour of our family in front of millions of viewers,” the father shouted at his 32-year-old daughter, a mother of two, before killing her.

    “You cannot change such a sick mentality by expecting rapid change of men, but rather by educating women, informing them of their rights, giving them a voice,” says Ozgun. “What we did was go to the nucleus of society, that of the mother and child. Tell people what was going on… This country will only develop if women are allowed to develop, and I won’t shut up about that until they shut me up completely,” says the feisty 61-year-old, who is now planning to start another programme for women – this time on the radio. “Where can girls and women go if they have a problem? They have nowhere.

    I believe there should be a social worker in every mosque in this country,” she says, while stressing it’s not in the teachings of Islam that the fault lies, but in many of the country’s outdated customs that regard women as subservient.

    Yet Aysenur Yazici, host of one of the other cancelled shows, believes it was partly because she exposed the custom of religious marriages that her programme You Are Not Alone was pulled by managers who claimed it had become “a social problem”. This custom, where marriages are sealed with an unofficial religious ceremony and are not registered as civil unions, affords women no marital rights or protection. They can be instantly dissolved by the man, but not the women. “Nobody was killed as a result of my show,” says Yazici, for 20 years one of Turkey’s most respected news anchorwomen. “But I kept talking about these religious marriages. I kept telling women, ‘You don’t have to put up with the way you are being treated. You can go to the police, to a lawyer. You can fight!’And many did.”

    She cites one 15-year-old girl who came on the show who had been sold by her father as a bride to a man in his early sixties for 38 gold coins. “We phoned the gendarme where she lived and her father, husband and the imam who married them illegally were arrested and jailed for six months. We gave girls like her a voice. Now they have no voice again… Maybe I talked too much about democracy and this made a lot of people in the government feel very uncomfortable.”

    Since 2002 the government of this secular republic has been led by the charismatic ex-mayor of Istanbul, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and his Islamic Justice and Development party. While Erdogan’s government is moderate and pro-western, he presides over a complex country increasingly torn between conservative, often religious, tradition and modern western values. The conflict this creates is visible in the contrast between the lives of the metropolitan middle classes, where there is genuine equality between the sexes, and the rest of the country, where the majority are forced to scratch a living in feudal poverty, and where illiteracy – particularly among women – is entrenched.
    "All truth passes through three stages:
    First, it is ridiculed;
    Second, it is violently opposed; and
    Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

    Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


    • #72

      Since taking power, Erdogan has focused on such uneven development. But he has also made moves to increase religious freedom. His efforts to end the ban on women wearing headscarves in schools and state offices has caused furious debate, as has his unsuccessful attempt two years ago to re-criminalise adultery; in a country where polygamy, though illegal, is practised by about 25% of the population, it was widely believed the latter would mostly be used to prosecute women. Such moves have fuelled accusations that the government is seeking to steer Turkey, the only predominantly Muslim country with strict separation between state and religion, towards Islamic rule.

      In addition to highlighting the problems of this sexual battleground, Yazici says her show operated as an informal support network, with viewers offering women refuge and financial help. “Those women have been silenced now. Shows like mine have been replaced with dating games and light entertainment.”

      This appears to be the fate of Yasemin xxxkurt, the host of the third TV programme recently cancelled, Women’s Voice. The show was pulled off air after a mother of five appeared to complain about being forced to marry an abusive husband. When she went home she was shot five times in the head and chest by her 14-year-old son, yelling at her that she’d “disgraced the family”. xxxkurt’s show has since been resurrected on a smaller private channel. But the day we arrive to speak to her, its content consists of an ageing actress reminiscing, a 77-year-old retired sea captain wanting a new wife, and a man looking for his sister. “Of course, I am very embarrassed murder is committed in the name of honour in my country, and many women here are seen merely as possessions,” xxxkurt says defensively. “But men in Turkey are simply not ready to see women talk about such problems. And people had to learn that television is not a court where you can solve your problems.”

      Critics of the cancelled shows, including members of Turkey’s parliament, condemned them for discussing domestic problems “in an indecently open way”. But one of Turkey’s leading columnists, Haluk Sahin, also a respected academic, has compared watching the original version of xxxkurt’s show to “reading Emile Zola or Charles xxxxens”. Sahin is among the 33 journalists and writers who face up to 10 years in jail for speaking too openly on matters that “denigrate Turkishness”. In Sahin’s case, this meant daring to write about the massacre of hundreds of thousands of Armenians during the first world war – the same taboo subject that saw the prominent author Orhan Pamuk facing similar charges, until EU pressure led them to be dropped. Up to the late 1990s, only China had more writers and journalists in jail than Turkey.

      Regarding the cancelled shows, Sahin argues that it was the “sincerity” of the Turkish shows that was so striking, even “suffocating”, he says, in the extent to which they showed the “degree of helplessness of the participants”. Part of the reason for this helplessness is that Turkey has just two dozen shelters for battered women. “There is a desperate need for more shelters – if we were to follow EU standards, there should be one per 10,000 head of population,” says Hulya Gulbahar, a lawyer defending victims of domestic abuse. There are signs of hope. In addition to tightening its penal code to increase punishment for honour killing, Turkey is one of the few countries where sustained domestic abuse is now legally defined as torture. But in many conservative communities, neither the police nor the judiciary show signs of upholding the new laws. “The key to closing that gap is education, letting men and women know things are changing, and that they must change,” says Gulbahar.

      In communities such as Diyarbakir and Batman, it is a long haul. Last autumn the British Council helped fund a poster campaign in the area to highlight the problems of domestic abuse, and encourage victims and those who witness it to seek help. While the campaign showed some signs of altering opinion, many of the posters were torn down by those who considered even the mention of such a problem shameful.

      More recently, Amnesty International has run a nationwide letter-writing competition in Turkey to raise awareness of honour killings, entitled Talking to Guldunya – Guldunya Toren being the country’s most notorious victim of such a crime. The 24-year-old fled her town in the region of Diyarbakir after being raped by a cousin and discovering she was pregnant. When she defied her family’s order to marry the cousin, she was given a rope by one of her brothers and told to hang herself. Instead, Guldunya made the long journey to Istanbul to seek refuge with a sympathetic uncle. When she gave birth to a son in early 2004 she named him Hope, believing neither he nor she might have long to live. Weeks later her brothers tracked her down and shot and wounded her. In hospital, she made a heart-rending plea for the state to protect her. “Why do they shoot me? They should shoot the one who raped me,” she told a newspaper. “I want to live with my baby. But I know they won’t want me to live. I’m scared.” Soon afterwards her brothers entered her unguarded hospital room and shot her in the head. Her baby was taken into care for fear they would kill the child too.

      Sermons delivered in mosques are written by the state, and Guldunya’s murder was strongly condemned shortly afterwards at Friday prayers nationwide. Her two brothers were sentenced to life imprisonment. Yet even though the killing received wide attention, a song written about Guldunya by one of the country’s well-known singers was banned from state-run TV and radio.

      But against the odds, women in Turkey whose expectation of life has been little more than that of a domestic chattel, are learning to stand up for themselves. Even in such conservative regions as the southeast – with a little help.

      The fortress-like building that houses one of Turkey’s few women’s refuges is patrolled by 16 armed guards. The safety of the eight women it shelters is considered so precarious, we have to swear to keep the location a secret before talking to them. It is here that we meet Zozan, 22, from a small community near Batman. Zozan talks nervously of how she was passed from the hands of one man to another after her mother died. She was first pressed into a religious marriage by her father, who threatened to kill her if she dared to disobey him. But when he failed to provide her with the expected dowry, even though she was by then pregnant, her husband beat her, divorced her on the spot and threw her out. After a period of sleeping rough, during which she lost the baby, Zozan entered into a second religious marriage with a total stranger, because she thought this would restore her “honour” in the eyes of her father. He, too, quickly became violent.

      “My father told me I was an embarrassment, and in his eyes I was already dead: it would be better if I killed myself, and if I tried to go home he would kill me.” These were not idle threats. When Zozan was growing up, one of her neighbours, a teenage girl, was buried alive by her family after “the word went out” that she had a boyfriend and was pregnant. An autopsy later revealed that the girl was still a virgin.

      Zozan eventually went to the police for help. Instead of returning her to the house of her violent husband, as would have traditionally been the case, a sympathetic police officer took her to the refuge where we meet.

      Despite the hardships, Zozan is optimistic. During the few months she will be given shelter, she hopes to learn a skill so that she can support herself. “I don’t intend looking back. I don’t even blame my father, I blame the traditions he grew up with,” she says. When asked what she most looks forward to, she does not hesitate. “For the first time I’m going to celebrate July 2,” she says, smiling broadly. “That day is my birthday.”

      Some names have been changed
      "All truth passes through three stages:
      First, it is ridiculed;
      Second, it is violently opposed; and
      Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

      Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


      • #73
        AKP Women's Branch: Domestic violence a 'family matter'

        The New Anatolian / Ankara

        Though many female members of the ruling Justice and Development (AK) Party have criticized the party's Konya Deputy Halil Urun over allegations that he beat up his wife, two female branch heads have raised eyebrows by arguing domestic violence is a family's private affair and thus nobody's else's business.

        Last week a complaint was filed against Urun by his wife, Esma Urun, claiming that he beat her up when she confronted him over his alleged infidelity. However she withdrew the complaint after widespread media coverage. Nevertheless the charges against him couldn't be dropped because domestic violence is a public crime.

        Speaking to daily Milliyet yesterday, AK Party Women's Branch Chair Selma Kavaf said that the issue is a private matter for the Urun family, adding that she doesn't have the right to comment on it.

        Asked whether she would be dealing with the issue as Urun has allegedly had extramarital affairs through religious marriages, Kavaf, again, said that it's not her business, it's his.

        AK Party Konya Provincial Women's Branch head Fatma Unver supported Kavaf, saying that the issue shouldn't be interpreted within a political framework but should be considered a domestic matter. She implied that the issue has been over-generalized to include other members of the ruling party.

        But State Minister Nimet Cubukcu, whose portfolio includes women and family affairs, admonished Urun over the weekend, saying that men who beat their wives should be ashamed of themselves. She added that it's quite saddening for a ruling party deputy to be known for such an incident.

        AK Party Adana Deputy Zeynep Tekin Boru congratulated Esma Urun for making the complaint about her husband and condemned the deputy for beating his wife.

        AKP Gaziantep Deputy Fatma Sahin stated that there's no room for domestic violence within the nation's culture.

        The prosecutor's office can still ask for Urun's legislative immunity to be lifted and, should that happen, the office would charge him with "assault against a family member." Under Article 232 of the revised Turkish Penal Code (TCK), someone who subjects someone else living under the same roof to violence faces from two months to one year in prison.

        Domestic violence has been a hidden problem in the country for decades. Many attempts have been made to put an end to such abuse, such as launching initiatives and establishing parliamentary commissions to probe domestic abuse as well as "honor" killings. Nevertheless the issue remains unresolved. As a result of Turkey's European Union accession process, the problem has recently been the focus of a great deal of attention.

        It was reported over the weekend that Urun is a member of disciplinary board of a Konya-based foundation established in 1996 to provide financial aid for the poor and especially young couples who would like to get married.

        There was another report asking whether Urun's immunity would be lifted. It also covered accusations of his alleged involvement in fraudulent bids. According to the Joint Constitution and Justice Commission in January 2005, a request for immunity to be lifted was suspended.

        Urun's background

        While mayor of Konya in 1989, Urun brought gender-segregated bus services to the conservative city, but backpedaled after a probe was launched against him. He also announced that he'd open a hospital just women, but after facing a backlash he later announced it was actually a gynecological disease center.

        In a 1997 speech, Urun criticized population planning policies, saying, "They hold up Europe's population planning systems as an example to be followed, but women in Europe use their rights not to have children and get satisfaction from their dogs instead. The Japanese turned their attention to production and solved the family planning issue that way." The reference to dogs carries an indecent connotation.

        The Anatolia news agency reported that in 1997 that Urun wrote the preface to a book entitled "Marriage and Nuptials," published by Konya Municipality, in which he claimed that husbands "slightly" beating their wives is acceptable. The book also argues that disobedient wives can be beaten by their husbands.

        While Manisa deputy for the now-defunct Welfare Party (RP) in 1997, current Parliament Speaker Bulent Arinc delivered a speech supporting Urun, who was at the time accused of "establishing a federal Islamic republic," due to the gender-segregated bus service and hospital project.

        Current Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, then deputy for the since-banned Virtue Party (FP), in 1998 expressed support for the AKP Konya deputy in a speech. On the Parliament floor, Gul addressed his fellow deputies as follows: "The attrition policy launched against the mayors, namely the real representatives of the public, is a dangerous provocation. Don't drag Turkey into chaos and don't mess with Halil Urun, [Ankara Mayor] Melih Gokcek, and [then Istanbul Mayor, now Prime Minister] Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in order not to belittle Turkey in the eyes of the entire world."
        "All truth passes through three stages:
        First, it is ridiculed;
        Second, it is violently opposed; and
        Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

        Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


        • #74
          Memory-less Turkey/amnesiac Turkey

          Sunday, May 28, 2006

          Societies are distinguished from one another not only by their governmental styles and their economic structures but also by their relations with the past.

          Elif Şafak
          Societies are distinguished from one another not only by their governmental styles and their economic structures, but also by their relations with the past. Every nation-state rewrites its own history, and does so subjectively. But while some can be called "amnesiac societies," still others can be called "memory-bound societies."

          For some nation-states, the collective-memory of their society is an all-important thing. Some societies take the task of remembering the past as just that: a mission that is incumbent upon them to carry out. For them, it is a citizen's duty to remember the past. This is, for example, how the Germans are. In Germany, knowing the history of the country and its people is a citizen's duty. Whether in the educational system or simply in daily life, ways of keeping the collective memory alive and well have been woven into existence. Everything is aimed at remembering. And this is not just in reference to good things, but to bad things as well. The memories which are most difficult to ponder are World War I, World War II and post-Nazi Germany.

          What is as interesting as the importance it places on the collective memory of society is how modern Germany is determined to remind its citizens of the "unpleasant periods" of its past. Without losing confidence in themselves, Germans have, over this past century, been able to find the balance in talking about the dark periods from their past, and accepting their mistakes. Critical historical knowledge and a feeling for the continuity of history have been mixed into the cultural yeast of their society.

          With the razing of the Berlin wall, there was a new aspect added to the collective memory of the Germans. This was: How should East Germany be remembered? Some Germans recall that period with sympathy, even with nostalgia. This wave of nostalgia for Communist Germany opened the way to an explosion of interest in the sale of stuff from East Germany. Communist pins, emblems and posters sell like bread and cheese these days. But alongside this trade aspect of the memory, the archives of the East German police are also being opened to visitors, so that mistakes made and crimes against humanity can be known by all. Students flock to the museum that has opened along where the Berlin Wall used to stand. These visits have become a standard part of the curriculum in German schools.

          These days, there is another "dark history tour" that is taking place in England and France. The “Da Vinci Code” film has reawakened interest in conspiracy theories. Riding this wave of popular culture, European capitals these days are offering "conspiracy tours" to tourists. In Paris, for example, those interested can take tours that go step by step through the points where the film's scenes take place. They can set out looking for codes in the Louvre Museum. When it comes to London, it is already a habit for British people to know all about history and to be able to spot pedigree in others from the most minute details. On television, there are programs where people bring in their ancient family treasures to be scrutinized. They examine porcelain cups, trying to determine the age and through whose hands and which houses it might have passed. Or portraits, trying to decide in which mansions they may have hung. People are curious about the articles they have in their homes, about the buildings on their streets, about the stories connected to the historical squares in their cities. They value history. And so it happens that the dark corners of history, too, benefit from this interest. You can, along these lines, even take a tour in London which traces the steps of the notorious 19th century murderer Jack the Ripper.

          But what about in Turkey? The situation here is the exact opposite. With us, the tendency towards forgetting history tends to dominate. Turkey is a society of collective amnesiacs. Can you imagine tours in Turkey which walked you through the darker parts of our history? Tours which not only praised doings from the past, but were aimed at learning lessons from the negative sides of history? What about a step-by-step tour of Istanbul that stopped to recall, for example, some horrible event that occurred here, or some saddening course of events that took place there? Could our city host such tours that examine history, whether from the Ottoman or republic period, with a critical eye? Or would someone who tried to do this be thrown in prison on charges of "treason to the nation"?
          "All truth passes through three stages:
          First, it is ridiculed;
          Second, it is violently opposed; and
          Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

          Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


          • #75
            Teenage rape victim shot by her brother

            Sat 10 Jun 2006

            A TURKISH man dragged his teenage sister into the street and shot her in the head after learning that she had been raped.

            The girl, reported to be 17 or 18 years old, was said to be alive but probably in a vegetative state. Her mother was visited by members of Turkey's Honour Killings Commission, which has been struggling to stop such murders.

            This article:

            Last updated: 09-Jun-06 00:24 BST
            "All truth passes through three stages:
            First, it is ridiculed;
            Second, it is violently opposed; and
            Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

            Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


            • #76
              34 Torture Investigations in Diyarbakir


              A total of 34 preparatory investigations have been launched against police officers in Diyarbakir related to allegations of torture and mistreatment of children and adults during and after the March 28-April 1 disturbances in the city this year.

              Diyarbakir Bar Association Children Rights Center lawyer Cengiz Analay welcomed the investigations and told Bianet that "even if with a delay it appears for now that what should be done against torture and mistreatment, is being done. But the 24 torture files that have been opened should not end up inconclusive like the others".

              Analay said that as the city Bar Association they are following this issue closely and are waiting for the result of the 34 investigations with interest. He said they insisted that torturers not be left unpunished.

              "No reason can justify torture" Analay said, stressing that torture is banned by the Turkish constitution as well as international conventions to which Turkey is a part of, and is a crime against humanity.

              "We see it as unacceptable that the crime of torture which is regarded as a crime against all human beings, has been widely committed during the March 28 incidents" he said.

              Zero-Tolerance not sincere

              Analay said that although officials previously promised zero tolerance against torture and there was a decrease in torture incidents with the European Union accession period, "it has come out in the open with the incidents on March 28 in Diyarbakir that this was a temporary situation and that the promises made by officials on all platforms were not sincere".

              "Many people were detained and arrested in the incidents that on March 28 started off from the province of Diyarbakir and spread to nearby provinces and districts. In interviews we conducted with those detained, they told us that they were subjected to many inhuman treatments and that they were tortured in detention centers. Doctor reports, their statements to the prosecutors and photographs taken by ourselves confirms this," Analay explained.

              Law change not enough

              Analay added that amendments in the law would not be enough to change the position on torture and said that in order to prevent torture, preventative measures should be effectively taken but where torture was recorded, the culprits should be punished in the most severe way.

              The Diyarbakir Bar Association had applied to the provincial Governor's Office and requested investigations to be launched in 72 separate instances of torture under custody claims.

              During the incidents in Diyarbakir between March 28 and April 1, 2006, a total of 10 people including five children were killed as result of disproportional force used by the police and hundreds of others were wounded. 213 children and 364 adults were placed under custody where they were subjected to mistreatment and torture. (BIA News Center, Kemal OZMEN, June 5, 2006)
              "All truth passes through three stages:
              First, it is ridiculed;
              Second, it is violently opposed; and
              Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

              Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)


              • #77
                18-yr-old woman shot in head in 'honour shooting' in Ankara

                An 18-year-old Turkish woman who was married only last Sunday is struggling for her life at Ankara Hospital after being shot in the head by a brother in an 'honour shooting.'

                The incident occurred in the Mamak in Ankara province.Yasemin Cetin who got married last Sunday was returned to her family the following day by her husband who claimed that she was not a virgin.

                The Çetin family then called a family council. Though Yasemin Çetin said she had been raped by one of her in-laws, her family decided to entrusted her older brother Gokhan with the task of killing her. Her brother shot her with one bullet to the head. She was afterwards taken to hospital in Ankara where her condition is said to be vey serious.

                Both the girl's father and older brother have been taken into custody by the authorities.

                In a notorious 'honour killing' in February 2004, Guldanya Toren was killed by her brothers in an Istanbul hospital after having survived a previous murder attempt. The lack of any security provided for her at the hospital despite warnings had raised protests among women's and human rights groups in Turkey.

                At a regular weekly press conference in early April, Turkish police spokesman Ismail Caliskan revealed that according to the official figures nearly 1200 people had been killed in honor crimes in the last six years in Turkey.

                Mostly of those implicated in the honor crimes, were born in the south and southeastern Turkish regions, their criminal records indicated. However, most honor crimes were actually committed in the Marmara and Aegean region. (Cihan News Agency, June 7, 2006)
                "All truth passes through three stages:
                First, it is ridiculed;
                Second, it is violently opposed; and
                Third, it is accepted as self-evident."

                Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)