Tweet
Brenda Schaffer Throws Every Possible Garbage at Armenians
Right now, I was listening to BBC World Service's World Update where in an interview with Dan Damon, that xxxxx Brenda Schaffer (BS) spewed every possible, imaginable puke at the Armenians.
From what I remember, defending US's stance on supporting Azgarbageland and the Aliev US trip:
BS: "Azerbaijan" is an open and liberal country, with the highest economic growth rate.
BS: "Azerbaijan's" tolerance of its minorities is exemplary, not in the thousands of years of its history (!) (give us a f*kking break!), any anti-Semitism has been recorded.
She also mentioned her trip to Azgarbageland with the members of the Jewish lobby.
In response to Dan Damon's question about the shelling of Armenians in Artsakh, the filthy xxxxx regurgitated the fantastic crap, after stating that "it's difficult to see who's the underdog and who is shelling who" (!):
BS: It's Armenia that is occupying 20%! of "recognized" "Azeri" territory.
(H.: Artsakh being 5% of the total of so called "Azeri" territory, which was never a part of independent "Azerbaijan", cannot occupy itself and the liberated territory constitutes more or less 9%. 5 + 9 = 14 not 20%.)
BS: The one million "Azeri" refugees who have to go back to their homes.
(H.: The myth of one million "refugees" was shattered by the Turkish minded Counsel of Europe in this report:
where it clearly states that:
"13. In Azerbaijan... It is impossible to establish the number of people currently concerned with any certainty. Your Rapporteur notes the figures provided in the report of Mrs Vermot-Mangold10. These figures can however be updated by statistics provided by UNHCR (for the end of 2004)11 which indicate a figure of 578,545 internally displaced persons and 8,606 refugees." Eight Thousand six hundred and six "Azeri" refugees in total.)
(H.: The xxxxx does not mention that It is the CONSEQUENCE of "Azeri" aggression on Armenians, after genocidal and up to now unpunished acts in Sumgait, Baku, Gandzak, and other parts of "Azerbaijan", which caused the expulsion of 3 to 400,000 Armenians from "Azerbaijan". Why doesn’t Brenda Schaffer mention them? Why is she taking the side of the aggressor?
The "Azeri" government could have housed their so called refugees long ago in 180,000 houses belonging to the Armenians, most of them wealthy people mainly in Baku, but it prefers to use the "refugees" as propaganda.
The xxxxx does not mention the destruction of Armenian heritage in Nakhijevan…)
BS: The Armenians have to make significant compromise.
H.: Why?
You can listen to the program here:
From what I remember, defending US's stance on supporting Azgarbageland and the Aliev US trip:
BS: "Azerbaijan" is an open and liberal country, with the highest economic growth rate.
BS: "Azerbaijan's" tolerance of its minorities is exemplary, not in the thousands of years of its history (!) (give us a f*kking break!), any anti-Semitism has been recorded.
She also mentioned her trip to Azgarbageland with the members of the Jewish lobby.
In response to Dan Damon's question about the shelling of Armenians in Artsakh, the filthy xxxxx regurgitated the fantastic crap, after stating that "it's difficult to see who's the underdog and who is shelling who" (!):
BS: It's Armenia that is occupying 20%! of "recognized" "Azeri" territory.
(H.: Artsakh being 5% of the total of so called "Azeri" territory, which was never a part of independent "Azerbaijan", cannot occupy itself and the liberated territory constitutes more or less 9%. 5 + 9 = 14 not 20%.)
BS: The one million "Azeri" refugees who have to go back to their homes.
(H.: The myth of one million "refugees" was shattered by the Turkish minded Counsel of Europe in this report:
where it clearly states that:
"13. In Azerbaijan... It is impossible to establish the number of people currently concerned with any certainty. Your Rapporteur notes the figures provided in the report of Mrs Vermot-Mangold10. These figures can however be updated by statistics provided by UNHCR (for the end of 2004)11 which indicate a figure of 578,545 internally displaced persons and 8,606 refugees." Eight Thousand six hundred and six "Azeri" refugees in total.)
(H.: The xxxxx does not mention that It is the CONSEQUENCE of "Azeri" aggression on Armenians, after genocidal and up to now unpunished acts in Sumgait, Baku, Gandzak, and other parts of "Azerbaijan", which caused the expulsion of 3 to 400,000 Armenians from "Azerbaijan". Why doesn’t Brenda Schaffer mention them? Why is she taking the side of the aggressor?
The "Azeri" government could have housed their so called refugees long ago in 180,000 houses belonging to the Armenians, most of them wealthy people mainly in Baku, but it prefers to use the "refugees" as propaganda.
The xxxxx does not mention the destruction of Armenian heritage in Nakhijevan…)
BS: The Armenians have to make significant compromise.
H.: Why?
You can listen to the program here:
Comment