Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia: the end of the debate?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hipeter924
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Originally posted by Mukuch View Post
    I think you do not understand (or pretend to do not understand) the difference of debating about some thing controversial and misinterpreting and revisioning historical facts.
    History is not an “established doctrine” it is History. And there can not be “versions” for History. “Debating in all forms” about historical facts is nothing but revisionism and that what turks (including ones like yourself) do: trying to alter history
    Well do you expect anything different from a nation that regularly masturbates before statues of Ataturk?

    It's a greater leader cult than Stalin or Mao, and neither of those leaders wrote/told true histories either just nationalist or ideological fiction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mukuch
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Originally posted by Jos View Post
    Research, discussion, debate in all forms should be encouraged and not just dismissed because of snide remarks or established doctrines.
    I think you do not understand (or pretend to do not understand) the difference of debating about some thing controversial and misinterpreting and revisioning historical facts.
    History is not an “established doctrine” it is History. And there can not be “versions” for History. “Debating in all forms” about historical facts is nothing but revisionism and that what turks (including ones like yourself) do: trying to alter history

    Leave a comment:


  • Anoush
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Originally posted by Hellektor View Post
    Կարմիր, կապոյտ, նարնջի
    Մեր դրօշակն է հայրենի


    What are maps... but lines drawn by “powers” on papers according to their whims that can be torn into pieces and thrown away when needed?

    My self-made avatar shows the territories belonging to Armenia according to international law, the international law defined by the Judeo/Saxon sonofabitchery itself, not mine.
    Մենք ալ այսպէս կըսենք Հէլլէքդոր ջան:

    Կարմիր Կապոյտ Նարընջագոյն կեցցէ դրօշակն Հայուն:
    Last edited by Anoush; 11-05-2009, 01:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlphaPapa
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Ok, if all of the blue is included, I'm fine with it, but there's this one village in Iran...by the border...eww...we can let them have it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Anoush
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Dear Alpha, I happen to agree with Hellektor, I mean about his avatar. Our historical lands belongs to the heirs of Armenians (US and our children's children and so on....). Western Armenia as well as Artsakh and Akhalklak and Akhaltskha has been and should be returned to us Armenians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hellektor
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Originally posted by alphapapa View Post
    i dont know anything about comments, but i think you should edit your avatar to reflect artsakhs independence.
    Կարմիր, կապոյտ, նարնջի
    Մեր դրօշակն է հայրենի


    What are maps... but lines drawn by “powers” on papers according to their whims that can be torn into pieces and thrown away when needed?

    My self-made avatar shows the territories belonging to Armenia according to international law, the international law defined by the Judeo/Saxon sonofabitchery itself, not mine.

    These territories ARE part of Armenia, not only historically and morally, but legally. That the genocidal pestilence known as Turk refuses to abide by the law it confirmed by putting its own disgusting signature under the relevant legal paper with its own maladroit and all destroying paw; that the Judeo/Saxon bastardry has opted for adhering to their Cult of Turk Phallus Worship and can't get enough of the Turkish delight coming out of the object of their worship being sprayed in their filthy muzzles and injected in their putrid behinds for the time being and the foreseeable future, are questions which can only be solved when a patriotic government rules the RoA and not the present clan of ignorant and lousy career-monger mobsters.

    I like the avatar as is and I am not thinking of editing it before the murderous parasite has evacuated the territories. I am not going to apologize for turning down your suggestion. I hope you won’t mind

    Leave a comment:


  • KarotheGreat
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Originally posted by AlphaPapa View Post
    I dont know anything about comments, but I think you should edit your avatar to reflect Artsakhs independence.
    Artsakh is part of Armenia and will always be like Western-Armenia is and when we get it back it will joined and be ruled from Yerevan.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlphaPapa
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    I dont know anything about comments, but I think you should edit your avatar to reflect Artsakhs independence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hellektor
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Check the comments about this stupid article here. I was just browsing and I saw most posters addressed the "author" as Miss Dyer! Seems the first name is confused with Gwen, Gwynnette or Gwynette.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hellektor
    replied
    Re: Armenia: the end of the debate?

    Originally posted by Jos View Post
    "GWYNNE DYER has worked as a freelance journalist, columnist, broadcaster and lecturer on international affairs for more than 20 years, but he was originally trained as an historian. Born in Newfoundland, he received degrees from Canadian, American and British universities, finishing with a Ph.D. in Military and Middle Eastern History from the University of London. He served in three navies and held academic appointments at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and Oxford University before launching his twice-weekly column on international affairs, which is published by over 175 papers in some 45 countries."
    SO

    EFFING

    WHAT?


    What does this have to do with him (OK I also checked it and saw that it's a he) being an expert on Turk/Armenian affairs? His article, the first post of this thread is so dumb, ridiculously written that it would make no difference was it signed Chingiz Isekoglu or something.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X