If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
My friend, it's not just the left wing liberal government loving equality mongers that hate the film here. It's also the right-wing evangelical Bush loving morons. I like how it makes both of these groups uncomfortable.
Who says that T. Blair was ever a liberal government loving equality monger?
Socialist are all, at their heart, a bunch of tyrants - tyrants even worse than their right-wing counterparts. However awful Bush is, we should be very thankful that he isn't like Blair. Blair (in terms of his real power and influence) is to Bush what Mussolini was to Hitler. But ideologically, Blair is the real Hitler of the two, I think.
Last edited by bell-the-cat; 03-20-2006, 08:02 AM.
Who says that T. Blair was ever a liberal government loving equality monger?
Socialist are all, at their heart, a bunch of tyrants - tyrants even worse than their right-wing counterparts. However awful Bush is, we should be very thankful that he isn't like Blair. Blair (in terms of his real power and influence) is to Bush what Mussolini was to Hitler. But ideologically, Blair is the real Hitler of the two, I think.
Are there powerful Zionist interests behind Blair as well?
Are there powerful Zionist interests behind Blair as well?
Probably. He is attracted to power and influence like ink to blotting paper.
Certainly he is the one solely responsible for "Holocaust Memorial Day". And, thanks to Blair, a tamed BBC is in their pocket. They might as well rename it JBC. Whenever anything is in the news about Palestine, it is always Israel that gets the first word. An Israeli sniper shoots a few children - then first the BBC talks to an Israeli "spokesman" and only after that do we hear from the victims or actual eyewitnesses. And in the few cases where that route is not open then the BBC devises other methods. Earlier this month when Israel attacked that Palestinian prison, and when the attack was actually going on, there were no Israeli spokesmen to put on since aparently they have a policy of not talking about events when their army is still "in the field". So the BBC had to use an actual eyewitness report delivered via a mobile phone. A couple of minutes into the description of what was happening the BBC cut him off, saying that "the phone line was bad" - when actually the sound quality was perfectly aceptable!
Probably. He is attracted to power and influence like ink to blotting paper.
Certainly he is the one solely responsible for "Holocaust Memorial Day". And, thanks to Blair, a tamed BBC is in their pocket. They might as well rename it JBC. Whenever anything is in the news about Palestine, it is always Israel that gets the first word. An Israeli sniper shoots a few children - then first the BBC talks to an Israeli "spokesman" and only after that do we hear from the victims or actual eyewitnesses. And in the few cases where that route is not open then the BBC devises other methods. Earlier this month when Israel attacked that Palestinian prison, and when the attack was actually going on, there were no Israeli spokesmen to put on since aparently they have a policy of not talking about events when their army is still "in the field". So the BBC had to use an actual eyewitness report delivered via a mobile phone. A couple of minutes into the description of what was happening the BBC cut him off, saying that "the phone line was bad" - when actually the sound quality was perfectly aceptable!
I tell you what movie needs to be made! One that describes and portrays the subtle yet totalitarian Zionist power on the Western world.
Comment