Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!


2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.


- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.


8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.
See more
See less

America's Financial Crisis

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Re: America's Financial Crisis

    When it comes to economics there is only one site I trust.

    What's Behind the Financial Market Crisis?

    by Antony Mueller | Posted on 9/18/2008

    The financial crisis is not over. Neither tax rebates nor low interest rates nor higher or lower exchange rates can do the job of reviving an economy that is burdened by debt loads that are too high. On the contrary: the policy measures that the US authorities have been applying will prolong the agony. Be prepared for the challenges of extended financial turmoil and economic stagnation.

    Early this year, the US central bank decided to manage the debt crisis in the light-hearted belief that a few aggressive rate cuts would "unfreeze" the banking system. Yet as of the end of the third quarter of 2008, the arteries of the financial system are still cluttered, and the financial system has moved even closer to total collapse.

    Those banks and brokerages that haven't yet failed have been kept alive by emergency monetary transfusions from the US central bank. The Fed has cast away all restraints of economic rationality and is acting in a purely political way. The Board of Governors of the US Federal Reserve System is pursuing the goal of getting the financial system through the mess — at least until the end of the year, no matter how high the costs will be thereafter.

    The American central bank has adopted the financial equivalent of the military strategy of scorched earth. The economic philosophy of the current chairman of the US Federal Reserve System can be summarized in the slogan, "No depression under my rule!" He resembles a military leader who stubbornly declares, "No defeat under my rule!" the more the chance of victory is slipping away, and defeat can be denied no longer.

    The current economic disaster is the result of the combination of negligence, hubris, and wrong economic theory. For decades, an economic and monetary policy has been practiced based on the illusion of, "It doesn't matter." At first it was, "Deficits don't matter." From that, the policy of "it doesn't matter" got extended to money creation, the credit expansion, the stock-market bubble, and the housing boom. Now, we're being told that buying financial junk by the central bank to beef up banks and brokerages also doesn't matter.

    As a byproduct of this mindless economic and monetary policy, financial market operators, too, have lost their heads. Trusting the official cheerleaders, investors hold on in the trenches until they will have lost their last shirt. Economic weakness is spreading around the globe. There is no new spurt of economic growth in sight. Yet many investors stay put because they have been conditioned to believe that government will bail them out.

    The current financial crisis is not of a cyclical nature. The financial turmoil is the symptom of the structural imbalances in the real economy. Over decades, expansive monetary policy has gone hand in hand with implicit and explicit bailout guarantees, and this has distorted the process of capital allocation. Under such perverted conditions, those investors will win most who cast away the restraints of prudence. It is a game that can go on for a long time — up to the point when the irrationality has become systemic.

    The behavior of the investment community reflects the incentive structure that has been put in place by the authorities. Investors have learnt to dance to the tunes of the pied pipers at high places. After all, the individual market player could see from those who were ahead of him in the abandonment of prudence how money is being made. In the wake of this, financial companies have become overextended and are now in need of deleveraging. Yet the core problem lies in the imbalances of the real economy.

    In the Austrian theory of the business cycle, the distinction is made between the "primary" and "secondary" depression. The secondary depression is what catches the eye: the turmoil in the financial markets. Yet the underlying cause is the distortion of the economy's capital structure: the primary depression.

    The simple fact is that the US economy is burdened with a highly lopsided capital structure as the consequence of a wide discrepancy between consumption and production, which, in turn, is the result of monetary policy. Persistent trade imbalances are the symptoms of this discrepancy. This means for the US economy that lower interest rates and government incentives aimed at boosting consumption work as pure poison. Instead of more consumption, more savings, less consumption and fewer imports are needed.

    The current financial crisis reflects that many debtors have reached their debt limit and that creditors are lowering that limit. From now on, business and consumers, governments and investors must work under the restraints of lowered debt ceilings.

    Economic policy as it is currently practiced is in a fix: lower interest rates may temporarily help to alleviate the financial crisis, but they exacerbate the fundamentals that are the cause of the financial crisis. Equally, a lower dollar would make imports costlier for the United States, while a strong dollar comes with lower import prices. But while a low dollar would help to expand exports, a strong dollar impedes export growth. Therefore, the United States will have high trade deficits as long as the economy does not fall deeper into recession.

    Without an adaptation that would increase savings, decrease consumption, and reduce imports, the US economy can only go on in the old fashion with ever more debt accumulation. But the limit of debt expansion has been reached. The financial crisis has reduced the willingness of domestic and foreign creditors to extend loans.

    Foreign creditors are getting ready to reduce their holding of US debt in a more drastic way. The governmental takeover of the mortgage agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailed out the monetary authorities of China, Japan, Russia, and other foreign countries that hold agency debt. As a result of the socialization of the so-called government-sponsored enterprises, the Treasury opened a window of opportunity for these countries to unload their US assets at subsidized prices, all at the cost of the US taxpayer.

    A profound restructuring of global capital has become unavoidable. Such a process is quite different from a recession in the traditional sense. In contrast to a sharp and typically short-lived recession, when, after the rupture, business as usual can go on, the restructuring of a distorted capital structure will require time to play out. Rebalancing the distorted capital structure of an economy requires enduring nitty-gritty entrepreneurial piecemeal work. This can only be done under the guidance of the discovery process of competition, as it is inherent in the workings of the price system of the unhampered market.

    Anticyclical fiscal and monetary policies are of no help when it comes to the daily toil in business to work towards reestablishing a balanced capital structure. The so-called income multiplier won't work, and lower interest rates won't stimulate spending. On the contrary: these policy measures only make the task of the entrepreneur harder.

    The difficulties ahead arise from the problem that business as usual cannot go on under conditions of a credit crunch, which has its roots in the distortions of the economy's capital structure. Thus, even if the financial market turmoil were to settle, there won't be the simple resumption of the old ways of doing business. The belief that, after the financial crisis is over, the real economy can reemerge unscathed, is probably the greatest error that many investors share with the policymakers.

    As a result of the bailouts and the socialization of the mortgage agencies, the financial system is now fully infected with moral hazard. The disastrous effects of these government interventions will show up soon. The major task of bringing the capital structure in order is still ahead and more pain is in the waiting.

    As long as governments and central banks continue to focus on the monetary symptoms of the "secondary depression" and continue to ignore the structural aspects of the "primary depression," they act like quacks. Ignorant of the lessons of the Austrian School, the authorities will most likely continue with their disastrous policies.

    Antony Mueller is the founder of the Continental Economics Institute . He is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and academic director of the Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil. He maintains the blog Money, Markets, and the Business Cycle. Comment on the blog.



    Achkerov kute.

    Comment


    • #42
      Re: America's Financial Crisis

      Originally posted by Sip View Post
      I completely agree with this. My position thus far which seems to have resulted in me being labeled a "red neck" is my inherent optimism in the outcome.



      But doesn't history repeat itself? Isn't that the whole premis behind why so many like to repeat this cliche about empires eventually "falling"?

      For the 5-year revisiting sake, there is no doubt Globalism is a reality ... China and India will continue to force huge shifts in how things are done. But in the long run, it is going to come down to the old producer/consumer factor. If you produce more than you consume, you'll probably be in a better shape than the reverse ... and in US's case, no doubt the consumption has been blowing out of proportion but it does have the ability to catch up in terms of production (in the broad sense of the term). Of course cutting back on consumption (again broad sense of the word) wouldn't hurt at this point.
      The U.S. has to go more than cut back on consumption. It is consuming more than it is producing and it is consuming more than it can afford to consume. The problem with the consumption and production point is that American economics ever since World War II has been heavily influenced by Keynesianism which assumes (incorrectly) that consumption is what drives and fuels the economy and not saving.

      When a society becomes consumption whorres as is the case with America, due to faulty economic logic (Keynesianism), they begin to spend and consume more than they produce and live beyond their means and in our case, supported by the good credit of Japanese and Chinese who continue to finance our extravagant lifestyle.

      In other words this confuses cause and effect. Establishment economists believe that lower consumer spending causes recession. They do not realize that lower consumer spending is a result and effect of the economic phenomena, not a cause of it.
      Achkerov kute.

      Comment


      • #43
        Re: America's Financial Crisis

        Thanks for the info above Anonymouse.

        I would like to add to the informative essay above that if we use the analogy of the individual consumer; I see similarities. Meaning the babyboomers in this country have lived above their means by living off credit cards and where did it get them? More and more into debt while the institutions who gave the credits lived it off of the poor individuals who got sucked in and into more and more into deficit for themselves and it's inevitable that such individuals finally went into bankcruptsy. But of course in the case of a huge and powerful country such as ours, the case becomes much more complicated and even more disastrous for the country and the taxpayers.
        Last edited by Anoush; 09-20-2008, 11:57 AM.

        Comment


        • #44
          Re: America's Financial Crisis

          Originally posted by Anonymouse View Post
          When it comes to economics there is only one site I trust.
          Thank you for the site. It looks like a very reputable and prestigious institute. How were you introduced to it?
          Մեր ժողովուրդն արանց հայրենասիրութեան այն է, ինչ որ մի մարմին' առանց հոգու:

          Նժդեհ


          Please visit me at my Heralding the Rise of Russia blog: http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/

          Comment


          • #45
            Re: America's Financial Crisis

            Bailout Hall of Shame

            September 20, 2008 11:40 AM by J. Henderson | Other posts by J. Henderson | Comments (1)

            The Wall Street Journal editorial page's Stephen Moore supports the trillion dollar bailout of investment banks. Stephen is the alleged champion of free markets and was formerly with Club For Growth and was a federal budget policy director at the Cato Institute. His reasoning? Taxpayers must be made to subsidize an industry to avoid a "meltdown." Wrong! The meltdown, caused by the deflation of a Fed-created bubble, cannot be avoided. The bailout is merely transferring the costs to taxpayers.



            Bailouts and Economic Calculation

            September 20, 2008 4:15 PM by Robert Blumen | Other posts by Robert Blumen | Comments (1)

            In his seminal article on economic calculation under central planning, Mises showed that a central planner cannot allocate productive factors in a manner consistent with consumer demand because the planner does not have the ability to calculate in terms of market prices. Market prices come about as the result of a competitive bidding process among decentralized private property owners who are seeking to earn profits.

            In some cases, firms are not just being bailed out, they are being nationalized. Nationalization means that the ownership of the firm changes from the private sector to the government. This puts the Fed, or the Treasury, or whoever becomes the de-facto owner of these firms, in charge of them.

            While the nationalization of the health care sector, the coal industry, the airlines, or any other industry would be bad enough, the nationalization of a single industry mainly destroys the ability of that industry to allocate capital rationally. But even within that industry, they have access to external market prices for their inputs and their outputs. And nationalized firms can still adopt technological advances that are generated by the competitive part of the economy.

            The role of financial institutions within a market economy is to allocate capital. Banks, for example, borrow from small depositors and lend to home buyers or small businesses. Investment banks invest the equity of the share holders in asset markets, facilitate the issuance of new securities, and manage the capital of private investors.

            This is why the recent round of bailouts of financial institutions is so damaging. The impact of these nationalizations is multiplied compared to the takeover of an industrial sector because the capital allocation function is so critical to a market economy. Financial institutions do not produce a physical good, they act entrepreneurially within the total capital structure of the economy to allocate productive factors. In no sense can this entrepreneurial function be replicated by a central planner operating outside of the profit and loss system.

            I usually try to link to a news story at the start of a blog post, but for this point, any of the hundreds of articles archived by GATA would serve just as well.

            Achkerov kute.

            Comment


            • #46
              Re: America's Financial Crisis

              Russia is also experiencing a 'financial crisis'. Some say the worst since 1998:

              Comment


              • #47
                Re: America's Financial Crisis

                Originally posted by skhara View Post
                Russia is also experiencing a 'financial crisis'. Some say the worst since 1998: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/index.htm
                Not just America, not just Russia, the 'global' financial system is doing very bad because the world's financial system is integrated with that of America's, the world's largest economy. I find it funny that western media with the help of their branches in Russia are choosing to 'highlight' the bad performance of the Russian economy today. Although there is dead silence when it come to Russian news in America, I recently saw several reports on television about Russia's bad stock market. What's going on, why are they all of a sudden interested about Russia's economy? In reality, however, it is the Russian stock market that is doing poorly due to its integration to the global system and various other political factors stemming from the Russo-Georgian war. Anyway, the problem in Russia is their - stock market. Other sectors of the Russian economy are doing quite well. More importantly, unlike America's tens of trillions of dollars of debt and deteriorating dollar, the Russian Federation today is virtually debt free and the ruble is very strong. Russia's economic problems today seem superficial and temporary, America's economic problems are profound and longterm.
                Մեր ժողովուրդն արանց հայրենասիրութեան այն է, ինչ որ մի մարմին' առանց հոգու:

                Նժդեհ


                Please visit me at my Heralding the Rise of Russia blog: http://theriseofrussia.blogspot.com/

                Comment


                • #48
                  Re: America's Financial Crisis

                  Originally posted by Armenian
                  Not just America, not just Russia, the 'global' financial system is doing very bad because the world's financial system is integrated with that of America's, the world's largest economy. I find it funny that western media with the help of their branches in Russia are choosing to 'highlight' the bad performance of the Russian economy today. Although there is dead silence when it come to Russian news in America, I recently saw several reports on television about Russia's bad stock market. In reality, it is the Russian stock market that is doing poorly due to its integration to the global system and various other political factors stemming from the Russo-Georgian war. What's going on, why are they all of a sudden interested about Russia's economy? Anyway, the problem in Russia is their - stock market. Other sectors of the Russian economy are doing quite well. More importantly, unlike America's tens of trillions of dollars of debt and deteriorating dollar, the Russian Federation today is virtually debt free and the ruble is very strong. Russia's economic problem today is superficial, America's economic problems are profound and longterm.
                  Integration into a global system is not bad per se. Trade and investment and the flow of capital should be encouraged and is in fact necessary in this mode of economics. The key for other countries was that they had relied too much on the dollar. Had the main dollar asset holders like China and Japan dumped their holdings a long time ago, America would have experienced a turmoil by itself and it would have recovered, but now we have gone past the point of no return. This is going to be a worldwide depression.

                  However, what America has been reaping on the world is outright fraud. It's banking system is nothing more than a modernized mercantalism. Part of the problem is with central banking itself (and fractional reserve banking in particular) which the Federal Reserve is the final arbiter of the mystical power of setting the interest rate, which is responsible for these boom and bust cycles.
                  Achkerov kute.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Re: America's Financial Crisis

                    Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.


                    Too bad this man couldn't be president. Wisdom.
                    Achkerov kute.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Re: America's Financial Crisis

                      Minister says Russia’s GDP up 7.7% in January-August

                      SOCHI, Sep 22 (Prime-Tass) -- Russia’s gross domestic product rose 7.7% in January-August, Economic Development Minister Elvira Nabiullina told reporters during an investment forum on September 20.

                      In August, GDP grew 7%, Nabiullina also said.

                      In 2007, the country’s GDP grew 7.8% in January-August and 7% in August.

                      The ministry is keeping its forecast for GDP growth in 2008 at 7.8%, Nabiullina also said.

                      In 2007, GDP grew 8.1%.

                      Source: http://www.prime-tass.com/news/show....id=0&id=444648

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X