If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an "inside job", according to a group of leading academics. Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.
The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday. But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated. Professor Steven Jones, who lectures in physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the official version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in history.
He has joined the 9/11 Scholars for Truth whose membership includes up to 75 leading scientists and experts from universities across the US. Prof Jones said: "We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone. "We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the bottom of this."
They believe a group of US neo-conservatives called the Project for a New American Century, set on US world dominance, orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq, Afghanistan and later Iran.
Excellent posts. Thank you all for keeping this thread active. I believe these geopolitical matters concerning 9/11 and the resulting "war on terror" will be the most pivotal global issue of the 21st century. These events also have a great potential to directly effect the Armenian Republic. We are living in truly historic times. I only wish our homeland would be able to come out of this global mess unhurt.
Just saw the rap video on the War In the Middle East and felt like I wanted to write about this but I know how Anon hates going OT so I decided to make a new thread covering this topic instead ... I did a search and I couldn't find anything so I guess this topic has not yet been covered? Dunno for sure ...
Well I suppose that in respect to the 5th remembrance day of 9-11 I would share with you guys, who I think are capable of keeping an open mind to asking questions centering around what actually happened on that day, a few links to some organizations that are desperately trying to show, with a ton of evidence, what MIGHT HAVE happened and also DID NOT HAPPEN on 9-11.
At this point I have watched three DVDs that were given to me the first one was the Loose Change documentary that although narrated very poorly was packed full of a bunch of intense information.
Then I watched a DVD that had a Physics professor from Brigham Young (bring on the Mormon jokes) giving a lecture on the evidence surrounding 9-11 and how science was unable to confirm the Federal Govs findings, in fact quite the opposite. A tad dry but also packed with info.
Then I watched a third DVD that was on the LA 911 Exposed conference and had like an hour from the author of Synthetic Terror who is probably the nuttiest on this topic but has REALLY does his homework. Then there was a speech given by the janitor of the WTC buildings, he was there 20+ years and was the last person they pulled from the rubble.
Now I am NOT saying that I know EXACTLY what happened on 9-11 but after what I watched neither do the vast majority of Americans. Especially if they buy into what the press has been feeding us ...
... and read about how the science and the story we were told about 9-11 does not mesh ... like oil and water. Makes you wonder why you never questioned the "facts" given to us on that day and every day since. There are a lot of other sites but these will get you going down the rabbit hole.
Never any shortage of conspiracy theorists...
There's also a Flat Earth Society... doesn't make it true.
I think this is hilarious ...
The only reason anyone would say "conspiracy theorists" in regards to this topic would be to strictly undermine the validity or authenticity of anyone who might be a skeptic of the official 9-11 Commission Report. They do this by using labels and stereotypes that instantly stigmatize the ppl the comments were intended for. All we're doing is offering alternative ideas that contradict the story as "we"/you accept it yet ppl are incapable of seeing the irony of this statement which surprises the heck out of me.
This is where it gets funny and don't take this too personal Sig, sometimes the truth hurts ... no matter which side of this debate you're on you're still a "conspiracy theorist" as you would define it. The official story is one HUGE conspiracy theory. So I suppose in that respect there truly isn't "a shortage of conspiracy theorists" as the vast majority of Americans subscribe to the official 9-11 Commission Report which is so scientifically flawed that it has truly become a "masterpiece" of conspiracy fictional literature.
I think all Americans owe it to the ppl killed on that day to watch the Loose Change documentary w/o talking through the thing i.e. actually actively LISTENING and paying full attention. I wish I could share the lecture given by this physicist from Brigham Young as he REALLY breaks apart all of the science into undisputable empirically created facts that he carefully gathered together. I'll find his name and share some of the more important findings he lectured on the next time I get a chance.
Oh and One-Way, "Mr. I was there first" did you even bother to pass this information around or did you just watch it and went about your business? You act like finding the truth is somehow a passing fad that came and went and now it's over. Right? How can we ever expect to make a difference in this world with attitudes like this? It's like ... "Yeah I saw it THREE YEARS AGO pfftttt! Been there saw that!" You treat it like somehow it's a non-issue. Whatever I can't believe how few ppl have enough motivation to actually do something about this ...
The evidence was always right in front of us ... does ANYBODY HERE understand how insanely hard it is to make a building collapse into its own footprint?!? Do some research on pictures of buildings after an earthquake and you can see how buildings fall in a natural setting. They fall over like you would expect ... the physics professor stated something about the preservation of continuing momentum or something similar to that where the word entropy was also used as part of this principle of physics. I'll have to go back and watch it to make sure. But I'll be back ... the summation of it is since the corner of WTC7 was damaged this principle dictates that a naturally falling body or building will collapse towards this damaged point ... which it did not. For Gods sake we can see the squibs firing right before it makes a free fall to land in its own footprint. You can watch the squibs firing upwards as it's coming down!! No pressure from the floors collapsing causing that!! lol
The only 3 modern steel buildings EVER to collapse due to fire all happened on 9-11. How many examples do we need to bring to the table that show how modern steel buildings all around the world have sustained fires that sometimes lasted over 24hrs and 20+ floors and still never collapsed? How many times do we have to remind you that kerosene is incapable of melting and especially vaporizing steel? You can figure that one out pretty easily.
I'll be more than happy to take notes on the physicist lecture and share those here so you can really see how the science doesn't add up AT ALL. Much more in depth and sound scientifically speaking than the Loose Change documentary, which is still really good but not as insanely in depth like the physicist lecture.
Anytime anybody wants to debate the evidence I'm game ... if you want to we can start with what I already stated above.
So Siggie I hope you can swallow your own medicine and realize that in this instance you truly were the pot calling the kettle black. I would like to use your own words in ending to say that ... although the vast majority of Americans subscribe to the official 9-11 report, that within itself "does not make it true".
How many times do we have to remind you that kerosene is incapable of melting and especially vaporizing steel?
The official scientific annalysis says that steel looses its structural integrity at 600 deg C and jet fuel burns at temperatures higher than that. Both statements are true and lead the fools astray. The fool fails to realise that the statement of "steel looses its structural integrity at 600 deg C" means the steel has to actually be heated to that temperature and that means being exposed to high heat over an extended period of time. And even if we assume the impossible, that the flames heated the steel to such a temperature, it was only over a few floors.
Comment