Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • londontsi
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Labour accuses David Cameron of making "another foreign policy gaffe" after mistakenly saying Iran has a nuclear weapon.


    Britain's Prime Minister accuses Iran of owning a nuclear weapon

    Also watch (video) his brown nose ( its only Turkish she.t)

    Leave a comment:


  • ashot24
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
    They are waiting... until it's the Republicans turn to f**k up the country and more over, the world.
    No empire lasts forever, the West power over the world will be over sooner than people thinks. And that process will only be faster if they start a war with Iran. The USA has lost its influence over the world economically speaking and they will be losing its political influence in the coming decades, so they have to resort to the last they have which is militar power, and they know that.

    All empires go through phases from the top to the bottom, even Rome fell, something which back then seemed impossible. As your own signature says, America has gone right to the phase of degeneration. It is only a matter of time, and a matter of the right situation in the right time.

    Leave a comment:


  • KanadaHye
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by ashot24 View Post
    A war with Iran will literally unleash hell, a chain of armed conflicts will start all around the world. It will be WWIII and IV, and we don't know what consequences it will have. But surely they will not be good...

    My message to the USA and Israel, sit down, shut up, and xxxxing wait!
    They are waiting... until it's the Republicans turn to f**k up the country and more over, the world.

    Leave a comment:


  • ashot24
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Why don't the USA, Israel and the West just don't shut up and wait? Ahmadinejad is a simple president, he will have to leave power one day. We all know Iran has no nuclear weapons, which in change Israel has. Doesn't Israel presents much danger than any other country in the region?

    Ahmadinejad is no dictator though the media wants to present him as one. And at the end, if you want him out of power so much, organize the oppositionists and overthrow him, Iranians already threw a Western-backed Shah, a simple "democratically" elected president should be no problem.

    A war with Iran will literally unleash hell, a chain of armed conflicts will start all around the world. It will be WWIII and IV, and we don't know what consequences it will have. But surely they will not be good...

    My message to the USA and Israel, sit down, shut up, and xxxxing wait!

    Leave a comment:


  • Haykakan
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    I think US-Israeli attack on Iran is what Russia wants. The higher prices for oil and gas is what Russia wants since it is a huge exporter of both. Should the Iranian oil be cutoff to China then Russia will hold even more leverage against the chinese as its role of supplier of natural resources will be even stronger.The war with Iran will overextend the USA military making it very vulnerable to attack. Russia is sitting in a pretty good position and can make a difference one way or another whichever serves its interests best. Russia has no love for a islamic power near its borders thus it may want the islamic regime to fail but i doubt it wants it replaced by a USA-Israeli puppet. It is very possible i think that before this war reaches its climax Russia will intervene in some way. I am more concerned about the impact all of this will have on Hayastan. Blockade of Iran will mean complete isolation for us since the Georgians are governed by turckish/western puppets.

    Leave a comment:


  • londontsi
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    .
    .
    .
    If Iran is attacked oil prices will sky rocket irrespective of what is the source of the oil a country buys from.

    The reason for this is twofold.

    Fear of perceived shortage of oil, i.e. markets, speculators etc AND
    actual shortage because of supplies or supply routes blocked.

    Theoretically all oil producers will become super rich including Russia and Azerbaijan.

    The fly in the ointment is, will consumers ( afford to) buy at those prices,
    will the whole world economy go into a recession AS WELL AS
    any major military conflicts for example if Iran decides to strike US Navy in the Gulf etc.
    .
    Also lets not forget any direct ( overt ) help to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
    .
    Last edited by londontsi; 08-05-2010, 02:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • KanadaHye
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by retro View Post
    China sources 40% of it's oil from Iran, and Europe would will be badly effected in terms of trade, but not so much the US. As it sources most of it's oil from dodgy, rigs in the Gulf of Mexico and Canada.

    If Iran closes Hormuz, then the US Navy will blow Iran's entire Navy to smithereens in short order and blockade Iran's trade. Then all the US need do is take out Iran's pipelines and without it's oil revenues, Iran's doomed.

    Iran's illegitimate, Islamist regimes hold on power is weak. Which is why it's forced to become ever more repressive and act like a clown on the world stage. However I don't think that the west wants a war with Iran. Israel maybe, but not the west.
    The question is where would Russia stand? If it's China+Russia+Iran+Rogue Leftist states VS. U.S.+Europe+Israel I'd say it would be a pretty good battle. I don't think attacking Iran is a wise choice but I wouldn't be surprised if the Republicans who will take the thrown after Obama's "restructuring" will go ahead and be stupid regardless.

    Leave a comment:


  • retro
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    China sources 40% of it's oil from Iran, and Europe would will be badly effected in terms of trade, but not so much the US. As it sources most of it's oil from dodgy, rigs in the Gulf of Mexico and Canada.

    If Iran closes Hormuz, then the US Navy will blow Iran's entire Navy to smithereens in short order and blockade Iran's trade. Then all the US need do is take out Iran's pipelines and without it's oil revenues, Iran's doomed.

    Iran's illegitimate, Islamist regimes hold on power is weak. Which is why it's forced to become ever more repressive and act like a clown on the world stage. However I don't think that the west wants a war with Iran. Israel maybe, but not the west.

    Leave a comment:


  • KarotheGreat
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post
    This is why China buys oil from places like Sudan. China also doesn't stick its nose into others affairs, they buy resources and provide Chinese workers while staying out of local politics. The western consumer which has spent its way into a mound of debt won't be as important once China, India and Brazil rise into the 21st century. However, the western consumer can't be replaced since 1 fat materialistic north american = 3 eastern civilians.
    China also buys oil from Iran, and when a war starts the prices will rise very very high. And Chinas economy can not grow without the West and without it's economy Chinas power can't grow. China needs peace to prosper and grow, a war will be as costly for China as it would be for the west thanks to globalisation

    Leave a comment:


  • KanadaHye
    replied
    Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

    Originally posted by KarotheGreat View Post
    China can not survive without the West, China needs oil as much as the West does and China needs also the Western consumer to buy it's product so China would also go down the drain.
    This is why China buys oil from places like Sudan. China also doesn't stick its nose into others affairs, they buy resources and provide Chinese workers while staying out of local politics. The western consumer which has spent its way into a mound of debt won't be as important once China, India and Brazil rise into the 21st century. However, the western consumer can't be replaced since 1 fat materialistic north american = 3 eastern civilians.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X