Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!)

1] What you CAN NOT post.

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this forum to post any material which is:
- abusive
- vulgar
- hateful
- harassing
- personal attacks
- obscene

You also may not:
- post images that are too large (max is 500*500px)
- post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or cited properly.
- post in UPPER CASE, which is considered yelling
- post messages which insult the Armenians, Armenian culture, traditions, etc
- post racist or other intentionally insensitive material that insults or attacks another culture (including Turks)

The Ankap thread is excluded from the strict rules because that place is more relaxed and you can vent and engage in light insults and humor. Notice it's not a blank ticket, but just a place to vent. If you go into the Ankap thread, you enter at your own risk of being clowned on.
What you PROBABLY SHOULD NOT post...
Do not post information that you will regret putting out in public. This site comes up on Google, is cached, and all of that, so be aware of that as you post. Do not ask the staff to go through and delete things that you regret making available on the web for all to see because we will not do it. Think before you post!

2] Use descriptive subject lines & research your post. This means use the SEARCH.

This reduces the chances of double-posting and it also makes it easier for people to see what they do/don't want to read. Using the search function will identify existing threads on the topic so we do not have multiple threads on the same topic.

3] Keep the focus.

Each forum has a focus on a certain topic. Questions outside the scope of a certain forum will either be moved to the appropriate forum, closed, or simply be deleted. Please post your topic in the most appropriate forum. Users that keep doing this will be warned, then banned.

4] Behave as you would in a public location.

This forum is no different than a public place. Behave yourself and act like a decent human being (i.e. be respectful). If you're unable to do so, you're not welcome here and will be made to leave.

5] Respect the authority of moderators/admins.

Public discussions of moderator/admin actions are not allowed on the forum. It is also prohibited to protest moderator actions in titles, avatars, and signatures. If you don't like something that a moderator did, PM or email the moderator and try your best to resolve the problem or difference in private.

6] Promotion of sites or products is not permitted.

Advertisements are not allowed in this venue. No blatant advertising or solicitations of or for business is prohibited.
This includes, but not limited to, personal resumes and links to products or
services with which the poster is affiliated, whether or not a fee is charged
for the product or service. Spamming, in which a user posts the same message repeatedly, is also prohibited.

7] We retain the right to remove any posts and/or Members for any reason, without prior notice.

- PLEASE READ -

Members are welcome to read posts and though we encourage your active participation in the forum, it is not required. If you do participate by posting, however, we expect that on the whole you contribute something to the forum. This means that the bulk of your posts should not be in "fun" threads (e.g. Ankap, Keep & Kill, This or That, etc.). Further, while occasionally it is appropriate to simply voice your agreement or approval, not all of your posts should be of this variety: "LOL Member213!" "I agree."
If it is evident that a member is simply posting for the sake of posting, they will be removed.

8] These Rules & Guidelines may be amended at any time. (last update September 17, 2009)

If you believe an individual is repeatedly breaking the rules, please report to admin/moderator.

See less

londontsi replied

08-05-2010, 08:04 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

David Cameron accused by Labour of Iran nuclear 'gaffe'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10886435

Labour accuses David Cameron of making "another foreign policy gaffe" after mistakenly saying Iran has a nuclear weapon.

Britain's Prime Minister accuses Iran of owning a nuclear weapon

Also watch (video) his brown nose ( its only Turkish she.t)
Leave a comment:
ashot24 replied

08-05-2010, 04:18 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post

They are waiting... until it's the Republicans turn to f**k up the country and more over, the world.

No empire lasts forever, the West power over the world will be over sooner than people thinks. And that process will only be faster if they start a war with Iran. The USA has lost its influence over the world economically speaking and they will be losing its political influence in the coming decades, so they have to resort to the last they have which is militar power, and they know that.

All empires go through phases from the top to the bottom, even Rome fell, something which back then seemed impossible. As your own signature says, America has gone right to the phase of degeneration. It is only a matter of time, and a matter of the right situation in the right time.
Leave a comment:
KanadaHye replied

08-05-2010, 03:30 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Originally posted by ashot24 View Post

A war with Iran will literally unleash hell, a chain of armed conflicts will start all around the world. It will be WWIII and IV, and we don't know what consequences it will have. But surely they will not be good...

My message to the USA and Israel, sit down, shut up, and xxxxing wait!

They are waiting... until it's the Republicans turn to f**k up the country and more over, the world.
Leave a comment:
ashot24 replied

08-05-2010, 03:28 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Why don't the USA, Israel and the West just don't shut up and wait? Ahmadinejad is a simple president, he will have to leave power one day. We all know Iran has no nuclear weapons, which in change Israel has. Doesn't Israel presents much danger than any other country in the region?

Ahmadinejad is no dictator though the media wants to present him as one. And at the end, if you want him out of power so much, organize the oppositionists and overthrow him, Iranians already threw a Western-backed Shah, a simple "democratically" elected president should be no problem.

A war with Iran will literally unleash hell, a chain of armed conflicts will start all around the world. It will be WWIII and IV, and we don't know what consequences it will have. But surely they will not be good...

My message to the USA and Israel, sit down, shut up, and xxxxing wait!
Leave a comment:
Haykakan replied

08-05-2010, 02:39 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

I think US-Israeli attack on Iran is what Russia wants. The higher prices for oil and gas is what Russia wants since it is a huge exporter of both. Should the Iranian oil be cutoff to China then Russia will hold even more leverage against the chinese as its role of supplier of natural resources will be even stronger.The war with Iran will overextend the USA military making it very vulnerable to attack. Russia is sitting in a pretty good position and can make a difference one way or another whichever serves its interests best. Russia has no love for a islamic power near its borders thus it may want the islamic regime to fail but i doubt it wants it replaced by a USA-Israeli puppet. It is very possible i think that before this war reaches its climax Russia will intervene in some way. I am more concerned about the impact all of this will have on Hayastan. Blockade of Iran will mean complete isolation for us since the Georgians are governed by turckish/western puppets.
Leave a comment:
londontsi replied

08-05-2010, 02:28 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

.
.
.
If Iran is attacked oil prices will sky rocket irrespective of what is the source of the oil a country buys from.

The reason for this is twofold.

Fear of perceived shortage of oil, i.e. markets, speculators etc AND
actual shortage because of supplies or supply routes blocked.

Theoretically all oil producers will become super rich including Russia and Azerbaijan.

The fly in the ointment is, will consumers ( afford to) buy at those prices,
will the whole world economy go into a recession AS WELL AS
any major military conflicts for example if Iran decides to strike US Navy in the Gulf etc.
.
Also lets not forget any direct ( overt ) help to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
.

Last edited by londontsi; 08-05-2010, 02:33 PM.
Leave a comment:
KanadaHye replied

08-05-2010, 01:42 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Originally posted by retro View Post

China sources 40% of it's oil from Iran, and Europe would will be badly effected in terms of trade, but not so much the US. As it sources most of it's oil from dodgy, rigs in the Gulf of Mexico and Canada.

If Iran closes Hormuz, then the US Navy will blow Iran's entire Navy to smithereens in short order and blockade Iran's trade. Then all the US need do is take out Iran's pipelines and without it's oil revenues, Iran's doomed.

Iran's illegitimate, Islamist regimes hold on power is weak. Which is why it's forced to become ever more repressive and act like a clown on the world stage. However I don't think that the west wants a war with Iran. Israel maybe, but not the west.

The question is where would Russia stand? If it's China+Russia+Iran+Rogue Leftist states VS. U.S.+Europe+Israel I'd say it would be a pretty good battle. I don't think attacking Iran is a wise choice but I wouldn't be surprised if the Republicans who will take the thrown after Obama's "restructuring" will go ahead and be stupid regardless.
Leave a comment:
retro replied

08-05-2010, 08:43 AM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

China sources 40% of it's oil from Iran, and Europe would will be badly effected in terms of trade, but not so much the US. As it sources most of it's oil from dodgy, rigs in the Gulf of Mexico and Canada.

If Iran closes Hormuz, then the US Navy will blow Iran's entire Navy to smithereens in short order and blockade Iran's trade. Then all the US need do is take out Iran's pipelines and without it's oil revenues, Iran's doomed.

Iran's illegitimate, Islamist regimes hold on power is weak. Which is why it's forced to become ever more repressive and act like a clown on the world stage. However I don't think that the west wants a war with Iran. Israel maybe, but not the west.
Leave a comment:
KarotheGreat replied

08-04-2010, 04:12 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Originally posted by KanadaHye View Post

This is why China buys oil from places like Sudan. China also doesn't stick its nose into others affairs, they buy resources and provide Chinese workers while staying out of local politics. The western consumer which has spent its way into a mound of debt won't be as important once China, India and Brazil rise into the 21st century. However, the western consumer can't be replaced since 1 fat materialistic north american = 3 eastern civilians.

China also buys oil from Iran, and when a war starts the prices will rise very very high. And Chinas economy can not grow without the West and without it's economy Chinas power can't grow. China needs peace to prosper and grow, a war will be as costly for China as it would be for the west thanks to globalisation
Leave a comment:
KanadaHye replied

08-04-2010, 03:41 PM
Re: Consequences Of Attacking Iran And Why Tehran Is Not Worried

Originally posted by KarotheGreat View Post

China can not survive without the West, China needs oil as much as the West does and China needs also the Western consumer to buy it's product so China would also go down the drain.

This is why China buys oil from places like Sudan. China also doesn't stick its nose into others affairs, they buy resources and provide Chinese workers while staying out of local politics. The western consumer which has spent its way into a mound of debt won't be as important once China, India and Brazil rise into the 21st century. However, the western consumer can't be replaced since 1 fat materialistic north american = 3 eastern civilians.
Leave a comment: