Originally posted by patlajan Jesus was probably a real person and teacher. If he did all the things that are written about him we'll never know. Even he wasn't real, humanity needs him anyway. The foundation for our laws today and our ideas about justice are based on his teachings.
I disagree fundamentally on the premise of which Jesus' teachings rested on, mainly deontology and altruism, as did many of the founding fathers.
The founding fathers of this country were mostly deists, regardless of their reputation for being Christian, and the laws that they created were based on mostlyreason, not God, mostly.
When a conclusion is based on a faulty or mixed/contradicting premise (such as the premise in the US constitution, which is a mixed premise of God and of reason), the conclusion itself will disintegrate as time goes by.
It is this fact that has allowed for such a crippling change to the US constitution; the inconsistancy has allowed for large government expansion, the welfare state, the special interests, the trade restrictions, and constant wars.
If one develops his epistemology, metaphyics, ethics and politics on a philosophy of reason, one will come to conclude a government of objectively defined laws, and not of men. Although a government of laws and not of men was the original intention of the founding fathers, the deontological/altruism:individualism conclusions of law have become more and more foggy as the premise itself is a contradiction of itself and a dichotomy, and thus the conclusion itself cannot stand to reason.
The solution to this problem is to have a non-contradicting, strong premise of explicit, not implicit, individualism, based on reason and not on a faulty premise of God or deontology or altruism.
If one reasons, one comes to individualism, if one comes to individualism one will find it wrong to lie, cheat, steal or kill (or tollerate those who do), and when a constitution is based on reason, the only thing that can destroy is it the power of a gun.
Comment