Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A Life Complete or Death & Answers
Freud divided people into believers and unbelievers. Under unbelievers he categorized materialists, seekers, skeptics, agnostics, and atheists. Under believers he included all those who attributed and gave intellectual assent to a supernatural being which gave them some spiritual experience. He called his view "scientific" simply because of its premise that knowledge comes only from research, which, if I don't misunderstand, you seem to support. However, this basic premise, cannot itself be based on scientific research. It is a philosophical assumption that all knowledge comes from research, and no knowledge comes from faith. That spiritual knowledge of God, and having ordained us with free will, is not material knowledge per se, for it is more based on faith, than the material certainty you seek. God gave us free will, which even though makes evil possible, is also the only thing that makes any love or joy possible. But this is off topic.
Going back to the original question of the thread, as I have said, I would take the first road and I've stated my reason(s), and my faith speaks for the rest of it.
Originally posted by loseyourname We don't assume that knowledge is of the material world. Give me the proper machinery and I can show exactly where in your brain your knowledge is located. Furthermore, most of your knowledge and your awareness is of material objects. If your soul exists, and it is indeed an individualized awareness of your mental states, then without a brain and without sensory capabilities, I would like to know what the awareness would then be of. I ask this quite seriously. I am assuming for the sake of argument that the soul exists, as does some form of afterlife. Now let us speculate on what that form may be.
Going back to the original question of the thread, as I have said, I would take the first road and I've stated my reason(s), and my faith speaks for the rest of it.
Comment