Originally posted by loseyourname You're going to change the system by ignoring its existence? If every single citizen of the nation refused to vote, then legislative assemblies will be forced to appoint officeholders. Want to see some real tyrrany?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Principles
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Anonymouse If no one wished to partake in the holiday of fools and be a part of the system, who would there be to rule? Then you would have what we call a revolution.
Comment
-
Originally posted by loseyourname Refusing to vote would not be a revolution. There are contingencies in place for that. As I said before, legislative bodies would appoint officeholders. Same system, same rules, no input from the mass of people. Where's the revolution?
You are really missing the point, for government, as defined by most anarchists, and me, is a coercive territorial monopoly of force.
Instead of it serving the "people", an abstract entity, it is a life unto its own, in which the people serve the government. If you remember your history lesson, government was created to "serve the people", yet somehow has dilineated from that role.
"Comparative government", wouldn't be that, since all will be privatized, from legislation, to police, to firemen, in other words there is choice, it is not compulsory nor is there coercion to participate in one system, you are free to leave since all exchanges, as in the market economy, are voluntary, and in order to gain in the market, you cooperate.Achkerov kute.
Comment
Comment